Englebert

I'm willing to state with a high degree of confidence that the Republicans would not have used to nuclear option if not for Harry Reid opening the can. In my opinion what the Republicans are saying is that "Harry Reid changed the way the Senate conducts business, we are just following the same rules."

You are a prime example of someone who accusers others of doing exactly what themselves are guilty of. I wish we had a word for it...oh yeah...it's called hypocrite. I have not said a word about O'Reilly because I have not read/heard much about it. As usual I will try to wait for the facts to fully come out without prematurely passing judgment. These kind of stories (sexual dalliances) don't interest me much. I could care less if Bill Clinton slept with every intern he ever met, and I didn't disparage him for his sexual transgressions. I do bring it up when a worshipper of Clinton tries to smear the other side for doing the same or less. So your analysis is off the mark. You are trying to equate my silence with condoning. I just pointed out your attempted disparaging comment exemplifies you to a tee. And as for your other attempts at smear, I back up my statements when criticizing Obama or Hillary. I have never, let me repeat that slowly for you, I have never criticized Islam. Maybe if you would spend less time trying to stereotype people you would realize that. Ooops, I guess we just found another thing you accuse others of doing that is exactly what themselves are guilty of.

I was glad the Republicans were blocking Obama's lower court nominees. In fact, at the time I was even thinking many of his nominees where included just so the Republicans would block them, thus he could cry foul...which he/they did. For the few nominees I looked at, the Republicans were just doing their due diligence, but the Liberal media was painting the Republicans as partisan obstructionists...per usual. Harry Reid was warned repeatedly not to use the nuclear option, but did it anyway. I am rejoicing the payback, and don't feel one ounce of guilt. I'm also fully aware that the Democrats will use this option when available in the future, as will the Republicans. Once Harry Reid opened the door, either party was going to use it at first opportunity. Let me ask you for the purpose of assigning blame, would the Republicans have used this option if Harry Reid would have abstained from using it? I'm also fully aware that Chuck Schumer purposely forced the Republicans to use this option, thus trying to spread more divide between the parties. His motives were 100% political. And he's banking on the Liberal media's all-out smear campaign against the Republicans.

So is this exactly what you tell yourself when deliberately about Obama?

[Hidden Content] I want to shout to the rooftops a big thank you to Chuck Schumer for allowing the GOP to invoke the nuclear option to counter the Liberal Party Of Hate (formerly known as the Democrat Party) political filibuster attempt, and for shining a spotlight on the unadulterated partisanship of his party members. Please, please, please Liberals...keep these people as your leaders. Harry Reid opened the can of worms and the Republicans just shoved it down their throat. That last sentence was just to remind you re-writers of history that the Democrats started this tactic. Any complaints about the use of the nuclear option should be directed straight to Harry Reid and the Liberal Party of Hate. Welcome Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.

And as usual, you would be wrong. Your analytical skills have been proven time and time again to be in severe need of an upgrade. You actually think Obamacare had a positive effect on the nation as a whole. Do I need to provide any more proof of the deficiency in your flawed analytical skills? This is what happens when you fall victim to the biased wing-nut looney Left-wing media. Many, many videos have shown Democrats think welfare is free money from the government, and have no clue tax payers are the source. There are way more of those than Republicans who don't know Obamacare and the Affordable Health Care Act are one in the same. And why haven't you provided proof of all of these red state protesters railing about losing their Obamacare. Just because you say it, doesn't make it true. Let me restate that, just because your Liberal leaders are feeding you that garbage, doesn't mean you have to eat it. Please explain the 1000+ Democrat held seats that are now occupied by Republicans. Do you think any will turn back blue when Obamacare is just a stain in the annuals of history?

Is throwing out baseless and false negative stereotypes considered ugly in God's view? Is personal attacks designed to shut down free speech considered ugly in God's view? If so, Liberals are in for a world of hurt. You think the Republicans are having problems because you confine yourself to news from wing-nut Liberal sources. I bet you didn't even know that Democrats have lost over 1000 seats in the last eight years. If you knew that fact, you wouldn't have embarrassed yourself by making that asinine comment.

You ran and hid from my post. But it's just a typical Liberal trait so it was kind of expected. Then to fly out lie and say you don't hide is just another typical Liberal response. And again, expected. Why don't you whine about Trump's "lies" some more so we can laugh about how a liar is falsely projecting their transgressions.

By yet you worship at the feet of Bill Clinton, one of the all time sleeze-bags. Can you spell hypocrite? And who on here puts FoxNews on a pedestal? Is this just another one of your stereotypes your Liberal gods tell you to believe? Don't bother answering, we all know. That laughter is getting louder isn't it.

I guess you think your qualified for that assessment also. This board sure can be entertaining.

No sane person in the world would consider you qualified because you had one semester of psychiatric nursing. You better pick the mic back up because you just made a fool of yourself.

The title of the thread might be a tad misleading. But it did get me to click on it.

I find it hard to believe a person that is capable of ascertaining Trump's psychological profile, with no formal training, is oblivious to the straightforward steps of querying the internet for a simple word definition. Luckily we have some caring, compassionate people such as REBgp to help you out with that flabbergasting task. Of course, the websites you visit might have a completely different definition. If so, why don't you post and we will discuss.

Your proof? I challenge you again. Back up your statement or endure the deserved humiliation. You've been served...again. Please enlighten us as to how your elitist mind (with no formal education on mental abnormality) can make such a clinical diagnosis based on...what? (Your Liberal leaders are proud of you though.) You keep spouting about Trump's mental state. But what is sad is that your are oblivious to the public revelations of your mental state.

So in conclusion...you have nothing. That was just a pathetic attempt at deflection, unless your "Birds of a feather" comment includes Obama "colluding" with Reverend Wright/Bill Aires/George Soros...I could go on and on but even you get it. So to personally embarrass you (like that is possible), I challenge you to defend your post. (You've been served.) Point out exactly what the Trump team or the Russians did to subvert our elections. It is obvious that was your point, because that was the point of your link. Are you up for the challenge or will your run and hide in true Liberal fashion?

Are you really trying to disparage FoxNews for some sexual misdeeds while worshipping at the feet of the greatest womanizer since John F. Kennedy Jr? Old Bill Clinton is a man that has legendary status in the annuals of sexual misconduct. Even you, and I say that after all of your ridiculously hypocritical past posts, even you should realize this rant makes you the king of hypocrites. I hope it is not a crown of thorns because after this post you will be wearing that crown for many years.

Wow. So much there...so much irrelevance. Why did the article fail to mention that many Liberals have these same ties? Please point out the points in the article that illustrate exactly what the Trump team or the Russians actually did to subvert our elections. If all you have is interactions between some Americans and some Russians, then you fail miserably...again. That makes me think long and hard now...I have interactions with you...am I now colluding with you? Do we have similar interests and like sinister thoughts now that we've conversed? I know I'm scared...are you?

But a few men have...and they wound up dead.

His hero, Bill Clinton, is one of only two presidents to ever be impeached, but he won't discuss that.

Source? Ooops, who am I kidding.

Damn, I was hoping Rosland Capitol was one of the companies that pulled out. I hate those commercials. Credit Karma and Untuckit were listed as a sponsor that removed their ads, and that brought a tear of joy to my eye. Their commercials are even worse.

I just heard the quote of the year, uttered by Greg Gutfeld when speaking about his view of the Liberal viewpoint concerning Susan Rice: "When you're a Republican, it's Watergate. When you're a Democrat, it's water under the bridge."

Can you show us any evidence Zimmerman did anything wrong? Like I responded to new tobie, please enlighten us as to how your enlightened Liberal elitist mind can pull crap from thin air. I sure would love to master this skill. I'm assuming it is easy if you just ignore your conscience.

Please show us your proof Zimmerman approached Martin. I bet you can't. In fact, I know you can't. You are also notorious for spouting crap then running and hiding. How about you surprise us for once and let us in on your enlightened Liberal intelligence. I would sure like some insight on how you can pull crap from thin air.

Sane people know this, I'm asking for the Liberal explanation.