Englebert

Yes they have. The people spoke and elected Donald Trump as president, along with over 1000 Republicans to replace Democrat controlled seats since Obama took office. They spoke loud and clear. And to get back on the topic you are desperately trying to avoid, do you think Susan Rice "colluded" (buzz word alert) with Obama in an attempt to destroy the Trump campaign?

I have still yet to get an answer on what the Liberals think the Russians did to subvert our elections. All they can muster is that Trump colluded with the Russians, the Russians hacked the DNC, and that 17 intelligence agencies agree on this. They have zero evidence of anything, won't define what "colluded" means, but keep pushing the narrative. Well it looks like that effort might come back to bite them. The Obama administration is looking more and more guilty each and every day. Now that Obama and the Democrats are no longer in charge, they won't be able to easily suppress the evidence, albeit the government agencies are still full of corrupt Liberals that think they are bullet-proof. If Susan Rice was a Republican she would have already been convicted by the Liberal press because of her past and very public lies. Let's see if her party affiliation can save her on this one.

And that relates to this topic how? Does Hillary still have an 10 point lead in that poll?

What I find hilarious and disturbing at the same time is he throws out these baseless claims, gets called on them, then refuses to answer, but will continue to throw out these same falsehoods. Anyways, it's fun for me (and many on the board). We get to think up different and creative ways to ask him to back up his claims. I know the exercise is futile, but it's still fun. I have to hand it to him, he keeps coming back even though he's been called out numerous times. I personally couldn't be embarrassed that many times and dare keep returning. I must have too much pride.

So who do you think should go to prison over the Flynn scandal? (Hint: it's not a Republican)

Please explain. My interpretation of your statement is that if you attack someone, then that person should not be able to defend themselves by shooting you. Is that the correct interpretation? If not, please enlighten me. And if you don't believe in self-defense, why would you be in favor of carrying?

Do you still have his poster hanging above your bed? Your obsession seems to be returning.

How about you name some of these people? You've been asked this same question many times and have yet to offer an answer. Why the bold statement but silence on proof? And why no more talk of Trump being racist? Did you finally figure out the man is not a racist, or did you always know he wasn't but tried to play the race card anyway? Is this your go-to tactic? Proof is piling.

Where did you come up with those figures? They are so out of touch with reality I just have to know the source.

Who is going to spend the money on R&D and the manufacture of new drugs if they can't make a profit? I noticed you ignored mine and REBgp's post on this...which were replies to your post. Why don't you invest in healthcare so you can make and sell your drugs at a negative profit of your manufacturing costs. What? You won't do it? Nobody else would either, causing the destruction of our whole healthcare system. What solution can you offer?

I can answer for him...he can't. Just like some congressmen, including Nancy Pelosi, claimed racial epithets were shouted during a Tea Party protest of Obamacare. Breitbart offered $100,000.00 to anyone that could corroborate these claims. No one was able to claim the money, but wing-nut Liberals still insist racial slurs emanated from the crowd. [Hidden Content] Why aren't the Liberals holding their own members accountable for the blatant lies?

I've asked you this before and you conveniently ignored my question. I'll try again. Why, I don't know because you will spout this crap again even after refusing to answer the question. How much do pharmaceutical companies spend on R&D? Have you ever did any research on a particular drug to see what the profit margin is? Don't forget to factor in the salaries of the researchers, the equipment and overhead costs, the drug development, the extensive testing for FDA approval, the marketing costs, and especially don't forget the health insurance costs under Obamacare for all of the employees. Now let's say the government starts limiting the profits on drugs. How many investors will invest on new drugs? Would you be willing to invest your money on something that costs millions to develop but cannot receive even an equal return on your investment? And once you develop a new drug, should you be able to recoup your investment money before another company steals your idea and creates a generic drug? Do you think research on new drugs will be severely damaged by legislation setting a price limit on drugs? Or do just like to parrot what your Liberal leaders tell you to believe?

Obama was the most coddled president in history. He had only a very few racists remarks aimed at him, by a few nutcases. The false cries of racism, now that is a bigger issue. It's almost unimaginable how the Lefties can get away with that many false accusations and expect people to believe them.

When you have extremely biased fact-checkers who live off of deceit, you will get fake news like this. I'm surprised you can't identify the inauthenticity yet. God knows you've seen enough of it.

Apparently not enough...Hillary is still not in prison where she belongs. Since you seem to be in touch with the Russian scandal, can you please explain to us how the Russians tried to influence our elections? Please give an analysis of what actually happened, that is, explain what the Russians actually did. And don't give the Liberal talking points of "the Russians colluded with the Trump administration". Tell us exactly how they colluded. What was said or done by each side to lead you to believe our elections where somehow compromised? And while your at it, please read up on how Obama tried to influence the Israeli elections. Would you be shocked to learn that American taxpayer dollars where spent trying to influence another country's elections?

This question coming from someone who thinks Obamacare is working out nicely. Now that deserves your obligatory "smh".

Nobody has said Obama personally wiretapped Trump's phone...except for wing-nut Leftist political pundits who posted the fake news so to keep their sheeple following in a straight line. For you to even suggest that indicates you severe lack of understanding of the subject. It is painfully clear who has something wrong with them.

Everything you said helps the working class. His Cabinet is comprised of successful businessmen who know how the business world operates, versus academia who have never ventured out of their safe space at public institutions...institutions that rely on government funding and are not beholden to the consumer. He did not try to strip health insurance from millions of people...that is an absolute lie. Name one person who is not allowed to have health insurance under his plan. He has stated publically on many occasions he will not cut Social Security...another absolute lie. And you have the nerve to say that Trump lies.

Here you go Bluedove. I didn't read all of the article, it was way, way too long. But here is a list on some of the things Trump has done since inauguration. Compare this to what Obama did in his first two months. [Hidden Content]

I disagree though with your assessment on "ultra conservatives want it gone and screw anyone without". Conservatives are not out to screw anyone, and feel the free market is the best driver of lowering costs. They also know the government has a long history of making things worse when involved. And before Obamacare my healthcare insurance was a lot lower than it is with Obamacare.

I agree, they should repeal Obamacare then work on a replacement later, which hopefully will never materialize. Too many GOP politicians feel they will receive an overwhelming amount of bad publicity for "kicking off millions of people currently on Obamacare"...and leaving them out to die in the streets. That's why some are adamant on replace at the same time. Real Republicans don't want socialized medicine, and will not support a government replacement. Even though the Republicans are united in repeal, some want replacement not because they think their constituents like it, but because of the fear of the inevitable backlash and false narrative that will come from the biased media. Personally, I think the backlash will be worse for those politicians advocating replacement.

Many GOP politicians want to replace Obamacare at the same time as repeal. Many GOP politicians want to repeal only without replacement. So the common theme is they all want to repeal. The disagreements come with the replace. So far, the only vote included replace...which too many GOP members will not vote for to have it pass. If you polled every GOP House and Senate member about repealing Obamacare, the vote would be unanimous to repeal.

I'm shocked you keep pushing the narrative that many Republicans like Obamacare. Republicans are in the most lock-step agreement to repeal Obamacare than any other issue I've seen in my lifetime. Many of the GOP politicians want to replace Obamacare...that is where the disagreements are.

Wow, you really think he hasn't passed anything? You need to get out of your safe space and gander over to some real news sources, in which you will see a litany of items already passed. I guess "lack of information" is expected when worshipping the Fake News sources only. And thank God for the GOP blocking Obama's ridiculous platform. Even with the GOP's opposition Obama managed to get us 20 trillion dollars in debt. Can you imagine what the debt would be if it wasn't for the "obstructionists"?

That's way more than we should have given Obama.