Englebert

By yet you worship at the feet of Bill Clinton, one of the all time sleeze-bags. Can you spell hypocrite? And who on here puts FoxNews on a pedestal? Is this just another one of your stereotypes your Liberal gods tell you to believe? Don't bother answering, we all know. That laughter is getting louder isn't it.

I guess you think your qualified for that assessment also. This board sure can be entertaining.

No sane person in the world would consider you qualified because you had one semester of psychiatric nursing. You better pick the mic back up because you just made a fool of yourself.

The title of the thread might be a tad misleading. But it did get me to click on it.

I find it hard to believe a person that is capable of ascertaining Trump's psychological profile, with no formal training, is oblivious to the straightforward steps of querying the internet for a simple word definition. Luckily we have some caring, compassionate people such as REBgp to help you out with that flabbergasting task. Of course, the websites you visit might have a completely different definition. If so, why don't you post and we will discuss.

Your proof? I challenge you again. Back up your statement or endure the deserved humiliation. You've been served...again. Please enlighten us as to how your elitist mind (with no formal education on mental abnormality) can make such a clinical diagnosis based on...what? (Your Liberal leaders are proud of you though.) You keep spouting about Trump's mental state. But what is sad is that your are oblivious to the public revelations of your mental state.

So in conclusion...you have nothing. That was just a pathetic attempt at deflection, unless your "Birds of a feather" comment includes Obama "colluding" with Reverend Wright/Bill Aires/George Soros...I could go on and on but even you get it. So to personally embarrass you (like that is possible), I challenge you to defend your post. (You've been served.) Point out exactly what the Trump team or the Russians did to subvert our elections. It is obvious that was your point, because that was the point of your link. Are you up for the challenge or will your run and hide in true Liberal fashion?

Are you really trying to disparage FoxNews for some sexual misdeeds while worshipping at the feet of the greatest womanizer since John F. Kennedy Jr? Old Bill Clinton is a man that has legendary status in the annuals of sexual misconduct. Even you, and I say that after all of your ridiculously hypocritical past posts, even you should realize this rant makes you the king of hypocrites. I hope it is not a crown of thorns because after this post you will be wearing that crown for many years.

Wow. So much there...so much irrelevance. Why did the article fail to mention that many Liberals have these same ties? Please point out the points in the article that illustrate exactly what the Trump team or the Russians actually did to subvert our elections. If all you have is interactions between some Americans and some Russians, then you fail miserably...again. That makes me think long and hard now...I have interactions with you...am I now colluding with you? Do we have similar interests and like sinister thoughts now that we've conversed? I know I'm scared...are you?

But a few men have...and they wound up dead.

His hero, Bill Clinton, is one of only two presidents to ever be impeached, but he won't discuss that.

Source? Ooops, who am I kidding.

Damn, I was hoping Rosland Capitol was one of the companies that pulled out. I hate those commercials. Credit Karma and Untuckit were listed as a sponsor that removed their ads, and that brought a tear of joy to my eye. Their commercials are even worse.

I just heard the quote of the year, uttered by Greg Gutfeld when speaking about his view of the Liberal viewpoint concerning Susan Rice: "When you're a Republican, it's Watergate. When you're a Democrat, it's water under the bridge."

Can you show us any evidence Zimmerman did anything wrong? Like I responded to new tobie, please enlighten us as to how your enlightened Liberal elitist mind can pull crap from thin air. I sure would love to master this skill. I'm assuming it is easy if you just ignore your conscience.

Please show us your proof Zimmerman approached Martin. I bet you can't. In fact, I know you can't. You are also notorious for spouting crap then running and hiding. How about you surprise us for once and let us in on your enlightened Liberal intelligence. I would sure like some insight on how you can pull crap from thin air.

Sane people know this, I'm asking for the Liberal explanation.

Yes they have. The people spoke and elected Donald Trump as president, along with over 1000 Republicans to replace Democrat controlled seats since Obama took office. They spoke loud and clear. And to get back on the topic you are desperately trying to avoid, do you think Susan Rice "colluded" (buzz word alert) with Obama in an attempt to destroy the Trump campaign?

I have still yet to get an answer on what the Liberals think the Russians did to subvert our elections. All they can muster is that Trump colluded with the Russians, the Russians hacked the DNC, and that 17 intelligence agencies agree on this. They have zero evidence of anything, won't define what "colluded" means, but keep pushing the narrative. Well it looks like that effort might come back to bite them. The Obama administration is looking more and more guilty each and every day. Now that Obama and the Democrats are no longer in charge, they won't be able to easily suppress the evidence, albeit the government agencies are still full of corrupt Liberals that think they are bullet-proof. If Susan Rice was a Republican she would have already been convicted by the Liberal press because of her past and very public lies. Let's see if her party affiliation can save her on this one.

And that relates to this topic how? Does Hillary still have an 10 point lead in that poll?

What I find hilarious and disturbing at the same time is he throws out these baseless claims, gets called on them, then refuses to answer, but will continue to throw out these same falsehoods. Anyways, it's fun for me (and many on the board). We get to think up different and creative ways to ask him to back up his claims. I know the exercise is futile, but it's still fun. I have to hand it to him, he keeps coming back even though he's been called out numerous times. I personally couldn't be embarrassed that many times and dare keep returning. I must have too much pride.

So who do you think should go to prison over the Flynn scandal? (Hint: it's not a Republican)

Please explain. My interpretation of your statement is that if you attack someone, then that person should not be able to defend themselves by shooting you. Is that the correct interpretation? If not, please enlighten me. And if you don't believe in self-defense, why would you be in favor of carrying?

Do you still have his poster hanging above your bed? Your obsession seems to be returning.

How about you name some of these people? You've been asked this same question many times and have yet to offer an answer. Why the bold statement but silence on proof? And why no more talk of Trump being racist? Did you finally figure out the man is not a racist, or did you always know he wasn't but tried to play the race card anyway? Is this your go-to tactic? Proof is piling.