Englebert

That is a beautiful analogy.

Your point is invalid. The threads on this site are to air grievances with both sides. Since the majority on here lean Conservative, the actions by many politicians are in line with the ideology of many on here and nullifies complaints. The actions by many politicians on the Left are out of step with many on here, thus the seemingly one-sided airing of grievances. Simple math. Couple that with baseless accusations and personal attacks by the Liberals and you get a natural reaction which you misinterpret as the Right piling on the Left. So what topics do you think the Right is out-of-step with and deserve more scrutiny by the posters on here? I seem to recall you saying nothing about Obama's lies, Hillary's illegal server, Benghazi, Fast and Furious, IRS targeting Conservatives, Obama wiretapping AP reporters, James Rosin and his family, Iran deal, Obamacare kickbacks, etc., etc., etc. But yet you feel the need to deride posters on here for not getting all up in arms about a topic you feel near and dear to your heart. Frankly, I couldn't care less about Trump accusing Obama of doing something that Obama has been proven to have done in the past. I care more about Obama's totally corrupt administration we've endured for the past eight years, and Trump's accusations fall way down the line of subjects that rank above Obama's many transgressions. Just because you say Trump's accusation is an important topic doesn't make it so, especially when you seemed to have cared less about the ones I listed. And why did you not find the need to start a thread on this one, since wiretapping is such a big issue with you: [Hidden Content] or this one: [Hidden Content]

Comprehension skills have once again failed you.

And the snowflakes continue to melt, rendering them incoherent with nothing but amusing rants based on nothing but personal attacks. I guess when ample evidence of failed Liberal policies has been amassed over the last eight years, what else do you have? When is your side going to start trying the race card again?

So is Obamacare...has been for seven years, but you mysteriously ignore that tidbit. Must be the sheeple gene.

But you enthusiastically voted for Obama...twice. And you still can't name a single lie, but whine mercilessly "Trump lies, Trump lies". How do Liberal talking points taste on the way back up?

Do you see the crap we have to deal with, texanabroad? Do you think you could have a conversation with someone so shameless he would make this post on a public forum? What's even more astonishing is that this is just a typical example of the maturity level of all of his posts. and of the level of the Liberal's side on this board. I've lost all hope of having any meaningful conversations...and have adopted the Liberal strategy of gutter trash from the get-go when engaging with those that have proven to warrant such responses.

It happens all the time. I've complained about Trumpcare (or Obamacare Lite). You wouldn't dare complain about Obamacare, or anything remotely associated with Obama. Sounds like you are transferring your shame and guilt onto other posters. And of course we want proof when baseless accusations are made. Give an example of Trump's lies (a thousandth time request). I can name plenty of Obama lies. You won't admit to them will you. Your bias is blatant and undeniable but yet you accuse others of being biased. Is that not the exact definition of hypocrite?

We've asked you over and over on this thread to explain what your question is. You have no question...just a statement that the FBI director gave testimony...and then rant about it getting ignored. How about you make a point then we can agree or make a counterpoint. It is not a difficult concept for most people. And if you want to balance the amount of stupid Liberal stuff with stupid Conservative stuff, by all means, be my guest. In fact, I encourage it. You and everyone else are welcome to comment, and to post your own stuff. The reason it is unbalanced is because you can't find the same amount of Conservative stupid stuff. So you resort to the "woe is me" and persecution claims.

Bluedove3 and the rest of the Liberals have been pushing this failed narrative for over a year now. I started a poll right after Trump won the GOP nomination. The poll asked if you would vote for: 1. Trump because of his policies 2. Trump because of Hillary's policies 3. Hillary because of her policies 4. Hillary because of Trump's policies Every single vote (there might have been one vote for #1) was for #2. Practically everyone on this board has consistently and publically stated that they voted for Trump because of the dislike for Hillary's policies. But the Liberals on here keep regurgitating the lie that we are Trump disciples. They have little regard for overwhelming evidence, and are fixated on that narrative. Thus, the unwillingness of many of us to give them the benefit of the doubt when a topic is started. We know their position, which is based on a lie, and don't waste time with civility. Bluedove's post is sadly just typical. At least this one was coherent even though patently false.

If you want to have a civil conversation on just about any topic, that is fine with us, and encouraged...as long as you can ignore the few Liberals on here making unsubstantiated, baseless, and off-topic claims about anything and everything. Then you have to ignore the many retorts forthcoming. Then someone has to get the thread back on topic, only to see the same cycle repeat. Other than that, civil conversations are just a thread away, and that thread will always come tomorrow.

I'm feeling pretty good myself right now, although you might want to let me catch up. If you feel like a conversation on idiots, I'll oblige. Basically I can check-mate you with one little statement...you voted for Hillary!

I'm just stating facts about Obama. Your comprehension skills are back in the empty bottle you left at the last bar you visited.

What bar did you just get back from? Get with PamFam, y'all are in the same condition.

I'm gonna have to respectfully disagree with you on this one. Many non-Liberals on this board have tried on a few occasions to have thoughtful conversations. We've had a couple of them...without going in the gutter. But the super-majority of topics have been plagued with the few Liberals on here going straight to the gutter from the get-go. Many of the non-Liberals just respond in kind. It's gotten to the point now where I have little interest in starting out congenial once I see the name of the poster. I've grown older and wiser...well, just older with the ability to spot the type of response forthcoming just by looking at the poster's name.

Wow, we are almost in complete agreement, except I would give Hillary a .01% of the vote without her married name and gender. I threw in Harry Reid because he reads directly from his cards while speaking, and the essence of his speeches is just flat out laughable. I'm average at public speaking, but would rate myself a 9.9 compared to him.

I'll agree that many Liberals have given Trump credit for his speeches. In fact, I almost had a heart attack by some giving him a compliment. But even you would have to admit that the volume of praise has been heaped on Obama (in manure fashion) way more than to Trump, even though the substance of Trump's speeches is undeniable better.

You are getting even more incoherent. I continually try to extrapolate your ramblings, but I can tell you now I'm at a loss. I'm actually afraid to ask you to explain further because I'm guessing it will just get worse. But please try, someone on the board might be able to attach some meaning to your responses. I know I will regret it, but please ask your non-existent question again. I've responded to your STATEMENT of "FBI director testimony before congress" with the obvious "what did he say" question. You refuse to answer then accuse me of not answering your question that was actually a statement. Do you really feel competent in carrying on this topic that you started?

That's the response I'd expect from someone who thinks he is playing checkers in a game of chess. Even you have to be embarrassed by now.

Ok, we can go with logical questions. Glad to see you finally asked one. The mainstream Liberal media fawned over how well Obama delivered his speeches, although they were pitifully lacking in substance. He continually tried to take credit for everything positive while simultaneously finding fault in absolutely nothing he did, and the media and Liberal consensus was that he was the king, close to godlike, for delivering speeches. Trump delivers his speeches with basically the same characteristics, but full of substance and "hope", but the Liberal media ignores his propinquity and basically ignores commenting on his speech giving abilities. So, do you feel that the Liberal media plays a concerted part in defining the substance of the speech based on the delivery? In short, answer you own question.

Really, you set the rules now on what I can include in my posts...you Liberal piece of Obama following fake news troll. Ooops, was that against your rules? Please give a coherent question for us to answer...your ramblings are baffling to anyone with two or more functioning brain cells.

You don't what? This is your second opportunity to explain your fascination with Comey's comments. You have yet to quote or comment on a single thing he has said. Are you now running scared, or worse, curled up in the fetal position because someone dares to challenge you on what is now multiple comments you have made regarding Comey? And what's so, so sad is that you have the nerve to try and call out this board for not answering a question that was never asked. You won't explain your post on this topic or even on the topic you started. If your objective is to be a troll you are very, very bad at it. You may be feeling low and ashamed at yourself, but you can take comfort in the fact that you've given this board plenty to laugh about. In fact, you have probably went overboard for some in which they now feel guilt for laughing.

Can you please make a point? What did Comey say in his testimony that inspired you to start this thread? A better question is how did your therapist respond to this question (I'm guessing with heavy sedation). But I'll take the high road like Michelle Obama says to do (but never does) and just ignore your pathetic and incoherent attempt at a ridiculous topic thread and challenge you to please explain your meaning, or elusive question.

So the topic of the thread is "???", and you have the nerve to say not one response. Your posts are reaching a new low so much so you should be speaking Chinese by now.

Why?