Englebert

And yet, with all that work, you cannot name a single lie. What's sad is you actually believe these are example of lies. You are so blinded by hate that you've lost all sense of morality and reality. Obama (and most other Dems) said just a few years ago that marriage was between a man and a woman. Did Obama lie? When you employ your mental gymnastics to this example to deny that was a lie, apply that same process to Trump and you will realize you are just a partisan hack with no sense of shame or morality.

Why didn't Obama, Hillary and Bernie pay their fair share? We learned that Trump paid a much higher tax rate than all three of these leachers...so why aren't they paying their fair share? I bet the tax rate you paid was substantially lower than Trump's, so why are you not paying your fair share? You bunch of leachers. That thunderous sound that is causing your ears to ring is reality crashing all around you.

I'm a Texas fan, but that little stunt pissed me off. I wasn't happy with his little dance on second base either. I hope Pierce puts a stop to these shenanigans.

I did the same thing. Now, we don't have to turn on one of those channels to see grown adults throwing childish temper tantrums and constantly spouting hypocritical statements and flat out lies. We can see it everywhere...even on this little website. There are a few on here that have lost all sense of shame.

If only you would have watched FoxNews, you could have saved yourself a whole lot of embarrassment. FoxNews reported almost immediately after Carson made his comments that Obama made the same comments years earlier. Since you raised the question, how ignorant is Obama?

That's the response I expect from someone that wracks their brain trying to think of a face-saving response but comes up empty. If you need further explanation, just say so...but I don't know if I'm capable of making it any clearer.

Since you seem oblivious to the obvious, I'll spell it out. You think it is ironic that I made the statement that authors on the Right do not resort to name calling while I'm guilty of name calling myself. I admit, I was name calling, but I'm not an author of the Right. So no irony exists, even though you really thought you had something there didn't you. Do you need further explanation or do you get it now?

Please explain why you feel it is ironic. I have a feeling you will realize the fallacy of your analysis once you put an once of thought into your response...which I will be surprised if one is forthcoming.

I only respond in kind. That should be obvious to anyone that reads this board. And I noticed you sure do a lot of running from direct questions. Pick which road you want to take. I'll respond in kind.

Cruz can do what he wants. I haven't discussed his reasoning for the visit, and neither have you. And frankly, with all of the issues at hand before America, this is the only one you can muster. This is so weak, petty, childish, sophomoric, immature, and really embarrassing for you. I guess anything to keep from having to discuss the real issues. You are rooting for the GOP to go at each other's throats so the party in power will fail. This would also mean America will fail. Why do you want America to fail? Why do you hate America?

This post says so much about you. Do you see the keys dangling above your head?

I agree. Obama should have had his butt beat on a daily basis. Instead he formed the choom gang and ate dog, then lied his way to the presidency.

The snowflake came out of her safe space to make an unintelligible post while ignoring the question posed to her from her previous post. How pathetic and predictable. Now give some examples of Trump lies in which your professional diagnosis leads you to label him with this moniker. Are you just an "un-degreed" psychologist basing your opinions on what your Liberal gods tell you to believe? Can you see the keys dangling above your head?

Let's say you spend 5 days in the hospital, and another guy spends 5 days in the hospital. The hospital needs to charge $5000/person to cover their costs and make a profit. The other guy is illegal and skips out on the bill, so the hospital charges you $10,000 to cover their costs. What is wrong with that? Why do you hate illegals? Why do you not want to pay your fair share? Now you go to the pharmacy and pay $300 for your 30 pill supply. What research went into making that medicine? How much money did the pharmaceutical company spend on R&D to extend your snowflake lifestyle? Why do you think the pharmaceutical company owes you? And if the pharmaceutical companies are not allowed to make a profit because you don't want to pay your fair share, do you think they will invest more money on new research?

It is obvious to pretty much everyone on this board who is pathetic.

Are you trying to make some kind of point? You sound like someone that just a learned a new word and use it in the most inappropriate times because you don't know the real meaning of the word.

Just like a typical Liberal...someone breaks into your house and you want to focus on the word "broke". Did he actually break something when entering your house. If the term "broke" is used does something actually have to get broke, otherwise it is a lie? What is the actually meaning of the word "broke". The person that "broke in" must be referred to by the politically correct term "undocumented intruder". Just like I said earlier, you are trying to focus on semantics when the real story is that Obama might have ordered spying on a political rival during a heated election. This is proof positive your Liberal gods can enslave you with silly distraction antics...just like shaking keys over a baby's head.

What about the article? Please give us your take. The whole issue seems to be whether Trump should be taken literally for the use of the term "wiretapping" or whether he was referencing surveillance in general. Shouldn't the article focus on the real issue of whether the Obama administration was spying on a rival presidential candidate right before an election? And what does it say about the Left when you can overlook the seriousness of spying by being so easily distracted by the deflection to semantics. Kind of like dangling keys over a little baby.

The authors of the Right are not hate-filled wing-nut Liberals resorting the childish name calling. And you have no idea what I read, and you are completely ignorant of what I enjoy. So do you think you're clairvoyant? Must be part of the disease with the mentally ill Liberals, along with that holier than thou attitude displayed by so many. I just got finished watching one of those little piece of crap Liberals on TV, and maybe I'm transferring a little of that attitude towards you. Time will tell, but evidence is mounting.

Is this even newsworthy? By that I mean, should anything the Congressional Budget Office have to say be taken seriously? They were horrendously wrong on Obamacare, so I couldn't care less what they have to say. Would you believe anything from a person that would have predicted Sabine Pass beating the Dallas Cowboys by 100 points in football last year? That's about how bad the CBO got it wrong on Obamacare.

Who are his followers? It's undeniable who his haters are. And what's wrong with Trump's tweet? Is something not true about it? Are you (westend1) gleaming some kind of hidden or unwritten message from it (like one of your links claimed from a post yesterday)? Do all Liberals think they are clairvoyant?

Sorry, couldn't read it. When the author resorts to immature name calling in the first paragraph, and compares the current administration to the film Home Alone after witnessing the previous administration's antics, it's glaringly obvious the author doesn't deserve the time of day for anything he has to say. I'll not waste my time on what will undeniably be more wing-nut Liberal dribble. westend1, can you please at a minimum link to a somewhat competent author that is not blinded by Liberal hate.

I'm assuming by posting your link under this thread that this is an attempt at some sort of equivalency...which is an epic fail. baddog's post is about a group's attempt at shutting down free speech. Your post is about Trump suggesting consequences for disseminating knowingly false and slanderous information, for which we have libel laws. Come on westend1. I know you are grasping for straws, but this is just flat out weak. You are venturing into the snowflake territory. And about your article. The author claims to garner critical information about Trump's mental state because Trump issued a few statements about how he felt. Well I gathered a few clues about the author, which I'm sure most other readers did also. The author is a flat out hypocrite showing his true biased and hate-filled Liberal colors. I doubt if you even read the article before posting because that little tidbit was glaringly obvious to anyone, so much so that posting this trash would be imprudent (to put it mildly). Your equivalency attempts are falling flat. Please keep trying though, these are entertaining if nothing else. Maybe with some more practice you'll find some better examples.

As long as he keeps rolling back Obama's policies, he can play golf all he wants. He's had more positive accomplishments in his first few weeks than Obama did in eight years. If he wants to celebrate with a round of golf, fine with me...as long as he keeps doing what he's doing. And if you want to criticize the anti-Liberals for staying silent on the subject, then you must also be outraged that the Liberals had no problem, through silence, with Obama playing golf. Actually, I didn't have a problem with Obama's many rounds of golf either. The less time he spent on the job the less ways he could muster strangling the country. (Although he did get a lot of job killing regulations enacted.) It's hard to imagine the shape of the country if Obama would have spent more time contemplating on how to destroy American manufacturing. If you think Trump is doing a bad job, you should encourage Trump to spend more time on the golf course.

None reached this level of foolishness.