Englebert

You keep avoiding my question, but keep posting on the topic. Why is that? Are you scared to answer a simple question? I'll ask again, and as long as you keep posting on the subject, I will keep asking. If true, are you outraged about Obama wiretapping Trump's offices? Please answer. And don't try the copout of "there's no proof" because you actually started a whole topic on a subject in which you have no proof. Just answer the question. It is just a simple little question. Your avoidance screams of evidence that you have something to hide...just like Trump's taxes.

If Obama would have said it you would have already carved it in stone as gospel. Does the burden of proof depend entirely on the letter behind your name? And you failed to answer...if true, are you outraged? You have no proof of Russians "influencing" our elections, but seem pretty outraged about that.

No, the first one was a clear as you can get...once fixed. And if you want to debate, please start listing some of these alternative facts that fascinate you so.

FIFY

I agree. I'm baffled as to how the Liberals can be so outraged about Russia allegedly giving some unaltered emails to WikiLeaks, providing proof for them that Russia is "influencing our elections", but not a peep out of them when a sitting President, who was actively campaigning for Hillary, is accused of wire-tapping a political rival. PhatMack is absolutely right, if true this rises to point of prison time. It's clear that Obama, Hillary and anyone else with a "D" after their name gets a get out jail free card, but anyone with a "R" has to face cries of "resign now" and "investigate them now" for any misperception of any word spoken. And lets look at what examples should evoke outrage from all Americans concerning our free and democratic elections. Which is deserving of outrage (if true): 1. A foreign government (Russia) that steals some emails (no proof provided), does not alter them in any way, and gives them to WikiLeaks in order for the American public to see truthful and factual information about a candidate. 2. Foreign nationals here illegally actually casting votes (illegally) for a candidate. 3. A surrogate for a political candidate, who happens to be the sitting president, orders wiretapping of a political rival during the middle of a contested election. And if you think that the first one deserves outrage, you should be livid at Obama for going way beyond this to influence the Israeli elections. And if you are outraged about the second one, why do you not support VoterID laws. And if you are in denial about Obama's role in wire-tapping, just ask James Rosen, his parents, and many AP reporters.

He gave Iran a clear and legal path to a nuclear arsenal while Iran shouts "Death to America, Death to Israel". I'm not sure anyone needs any more proof than that.

You seem to be the only one that believes that. Why is that?

I'm thinking I might feel like a minority on Monday and change the status of my company to a minority owned business. Maybe I will feel like a Native American and open a casino. (I might have to consult with Elizabeth Warren on this one.) I might feel like a Frenchman and demand a 35 hour workweek. Or maybe I will just feel like a 65 year old and demand my social security payments.

And BTW, more and more evidence is emerging that illegal aliens have been trying to influence our free and democratic elections in the United States...and this is being done through the actual voting booths. Shouldn't the Lefties be just as outraged by these people as they are with the Russians?

Is that why in the presidential debate between Obama and Romney, when Romney said Russia was our biggest threat he was mocked mercilessly by Obama and the Democrats for that statement. Obama even quipped, "The 80s called. They want their policy back". Why are the Liberal hypocrites so outraged now? And where was the outrage when Russia hacked into many government agencies, including the White House, when Obama was in office? And everyone but hypocrites realize that the Sessions saga is just fake news, brought out in a timely manner to deflect from Trumps highly regarded Congressional address. And this just adds to the perception that the Left is full of uniformed Kool-Aid drinking sheeple. And since the Lefties are so outraged with the Russians and now consider them our biggest threat, shouldn't they apologize to Palin and Romney for their relentless mockery towards the two just a few short years ago? Or does the Left feel that Russia just now became our enemy?

So you failed miserably in trying to state a lie by Trump, then when called on it you attempt to use the tired old worn out tactic of deflection. And what's even more pathetic is your attempt at condescension with that little qualifier attached to the end. There are a lot of posters that are deserving of using that patronizing closing remark when responding to posts...you are not one of them. I'm actually giving you the benefit of the doubt. I bet you failed to comprehend that I was using the Benghazi scandal to illustrate the incompetency of congressional committees, since you used a "nonpartisan committee" as your source of evidence. You mistakenly thought I was trying to bring in the Hillary scandal (which makes no sense in this context), so tried to counter with "both sides do it" argument. But I'll let you save a little dignity and conclude you were just using the overused Lefty tactic of deflection.

You know the military was hunting Bin Laden under Bush but didn't get him until Obama was president, but you had no problem giving Obama full credit for killing Bin Laden. So don't be a hypocrite and give Trump his full credit due because he was the current office holder when the debt dropped.

I knew the request would go unanswered. I don't particularly like calling her out, but when she gets on here and calls 62,000,000 people idiots I feel no shame or guilt for enticing her to expose her true intellectual self.

Thanks for the blanket uneducated description of 62,000,000 Americans, snowflake. Profiling is bad, mkay. -Mr. Makey

No, I don't. Please explain the term. And please relate the terms "debt" and "deficit" in your corporate welfare definition.

That's kinda like saying Obama killed Bin Laden. Give credit where credit is due. And this topic, which you started, is about Trump's lies. This is admittedly not a lie. So I'm positive you are the one that deserves the "nice try" quip. Actually I think the "try" was childish, weak and pathetic and therefore undeserving of the "nice try" description. And do you actually believe anything a nonpartisan (or partisan) Committee has to say. How much money did the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office proclaim that, in their expert and infinite wisdom, Obamacare would save the American taxpayer? And what about the first 27 nonpartisan committees that investigated Hillary's Benghazi scandal. Not one committee investigation uncovered the fact that Hillary was using a private email server. How can you have a "thorough" (as reported) investigation without uncovering that little nugget. But yet you want to sight committees as some kind of evidence.

I was a spotter for the crop dusters when I was in my teens. I don't know which was worse, looking out for the water moccasins or getting pelted by those fertilizer missiles. As far as I know I think the crop dusters are GPS guided now...no spotters required.

Evidence of the low life Liberal scumbags that run the Democratic party has been in abundance for a while now. Why the Democrats refuse to recognize they have lost their party to wing-nut Left loons is beyond comprehension.

I could go on and on, but I'm tired now. I think y'all get the picture.

And the transcript between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch discussing golf and grandchildren.

And the Solyndra documents.

And the documents related to the Veteran's Administration.

And the documents pertaining to the Pigford slush fund that ripped off the American taxpayer to the tune of billions of dollars.

And the documents pertaining to Obama targeting reporters including illegally obtaining their phone records, emails and wire tapping.

And the real numbers for job growth including number of fulltime versus parttime jobs.