Englebert

Just when you thought the wing-nut Liberals couldn't get any goofier... Don't they realize the Democratic National Convention perpetuates the idea of Liberal mental illness and "otherizes" sane Democrats. (And an I.D. is required to participate.)

We've asked you to bring up Trump's lies and you can't do it. Name some of the outrageous things Trump says...it just proves you are a little snowflake in need of a safe zone.

You do this constantly. Don't be a hypocrite.

I initially didn't like Trump for two reasons: I was highly skeptical about his Republican leanings and I hated his childish name-calling. Since he was elected he has appointed very Conservative appointees, so that has eased my mind somewhat...although he still seems to hold the idea that government is the answer to problems. But the thing I hated the most has shockingly turned out to be his best asset. Liberals have gotten away with unscrupulous personal attacks against the Right for the last 20 years or so, and the Right has refused to respond it kind...i.e. taking the high road. This cost Romney the election. Many GOP politicians have bowed to Liberal ideology in an effort to prevent being branded by Liberals. Finally, we now have a politician that doesn't take that crap, and if fact, employs the same tactics. Liberals have disgusted me for many years, but I always thought the best way to handle such childishness was to take the high road. Trump has turned that on it's ear and has the Liberals showing their true colors. Taking the high road would have never accomplished this feat. I therefore salute, and even employ myself, the low road when dealing with Liberals. Maybe the Democrats will rid themselves of the scum and take back their party before long, and then we can go back to civil disagreements. Until then, I gladly join Trump in his unsavory strategy of fighting Liberals in their own disgusting manner.

I'm flabbergasted that Liberals don't realize that many on their side are pacifists, while the overwhelming majority on the Right are pro-gun rights. But yet the Liberals are the ones calling for war. Maybe they need a crash course on Darwinism.

I completely forgot about this. I read about Andrew Jackson and the Courts during college (many moons ago), but had no recollection until this jogged my memory. Much appreciated.

I'm not going to defend the "kill the messenger" tactic, but I sure would love for you to give examples of Reagan posting "tin foil stuff"? Let's analyze any one of his posts on content, just pick one. Then we can decide who wears the tin foil hat and who should be required to wear a helmet 24/7.

Did anyone ever support Trump's contention? Or did every non-Liberal on here take the "wait for the facts" approach, for which we are still doing? Didn't most Liberals convict Zimmerman before the facts came out, and continually accuse non-Liberals of supporting him? Didn't most Liberals on here convict Darren Wilson of murdering Michael Brown in Ferguson before the facts came out, but continually support the "hands up, don't shoot" lie. Now you want Trump supporters to "confess to supporting a lie" before the facts come out. What is it with you Liberals that shoot from the hip and condemn anybody that has the sensibility to wait for facts. Is it that "holier than thou" attitude? Is it the clairvoyant abilities that only your side seems capable of? We've seen this story too many times to fall for such foolishness. I'm shocked you didn't manage to throw the race card in there somewhere.

He can come to the Political forum. We already have some that do nothing but complain about everything but offer no solutions. If he thinks WOSgrad's response was blown up, he might be pretty frightened at the responses he will receive in there.

Are you not embarrassed by using the "kill the messenger" tactic? And BS Wildcats was exactly right...no comments forthcoming. But yet, we will have to endure the pathetic lines of "Trump is a birther" over and over again. When given a chance, y'all fail miserably to explain your position, but will continue to trumpet your nonsensical narrative. That has to be embarrassing...I know it is for most people.

Are you trying to make a point with your post, or just simply showing the continuing snowflake mentality? One of the points that Hughley made that I find extremely laughable, and it mirrors your rationale new tobie, is when he said "poor people need the government..." That is one of the stupidest statements that can be uttered by any human being. If a charity can do a much better job than the government at preventing fraud and waste while distributing a helping hand, why would anyone pick the government as a source of help? The government has proven over and over it's incompetence at being good stalwarts of money (money by the way that is being forcibly taken), but yet somehow the Liberals want to choose this method over charities. Shameful.

That's why I posted it. You made the comment that "black people didn't elect him. whites were the majority of his voters", trying to make it derogatory. I just showed how silly your statement was.

Please list your complaints of Trump's policies. Which policies do you find so offensive? And while you are at it, list some of Bush's polices that fall in the "crap" category. Hell, list some of Dick Cheney's actions you find so egregious. The glaring link you won't admit to is that each are Republicans. We could have this thread up the 100 pages quickly by just listing Obama's failed policies, but you won't admit to any of those.

Whites were the majority of Obama's voters.

But yet you throw out fear-mongering lies when someone suggests cutting back on a bloated system. You advocate for throwing more money into the system. You don't dare complain about fraud and waste that allow unqualified people to game the system, but deride anyone that suggests cleaning up the system. You are not consistent with your statements. And if you have compassion for young children and elderly folks, are you donating to charities? Why do you feel the appropriate way to help is to forcibly take money from people and funnel it through a governmental system that you even admit is full of fraud and is ran by thieves? Shouldn't you be advocating for smaller government and advocating for bigger charities?

I agree, politicians are the biggest thieves. What I can't understand is how you can admit this, then advocate for more and more government. Are you just a hopeless optimist that you think a bigger government will prevent more theft?

All the laughing you hear all around you is not just in your head.

Your comprehension skills seems to be adversely affected by your searing hatred. So let me try again. How can you be just fine with Obama for telling blatant lies that affect our whole country's economy and safety, but yet get so outraged at Trump for making a tweet? I guess only a true diseased Liberal can accomplish this feat of immorality while showing no sense guilt or shame.

I love his tweeting...it brings out the true Liberal colors. I'm still in awe on how you and the rest of the Liberals can overlook blatant lies by the previous administration, but can display such fake outrage over a tweet from the current administration. You might be able to make some money in Hollywood, you seem to fit right in.

When do they become lies? You seem to want instant gratification or else throw out the liar card, which is a sign of immaturity. If you displayed the same fake outrage during the previous administration I'm afraid you would have went postal.

You have no facts to back up your assertion, but are outraged at Trump for saying something without backing it up. Another shining example of the disease known as Liberalism. This board is getting fun again. You two please keep posting.

[Hidden Content] Hillary was the originator, but you conveniently skip that part, and probably even voted for her. You are outraged at Trump for parroting something your Goddess originated. That's a true Liberal for you.

We were definitely watching a different press conference. Or maybe just a different channel. I was able to form my own opinion while your channel told you what to believe.

And yet you can't name them. So who is lying?

Was this an attempt at humor? Or a cry for help?