Englebert

The dearth of comprehension by the snowlakes makes the Sahara desert look like the Amazon rainforest.

You might want to check Obama's record for being slapped down by the judicial branch. Then look up the definition of the word "hypocrite". If Liberal brains were made of polar ice caps I would all of a sudden believe in Man-made Global Warming.

But you've been asked over and over and over to name the lies...and failed miserably. And to top it off, you accuse Trump of lying by stating nothing but lies, and finish using childish quips even a 6th grader would be embarrassed to use. ...and the Liberal snowflake meltdown continues. You are so ate up and butt-hurt by Trump's presidency you can't even form cogent sentences. Man, I can't get this ear to ear smile off of my face. I don't like laughing at people in mentally stressful conditions which cause instability, but the last 4 months have been irresistibly funny. The antics of the Liberals keeps getting increasingly hilarious when they are faced with adults in charge. Although the childishness of the Liberals is just too darn funny, I am concerned about the depravity to which the Liberals will stoop. Y'all have a long way to go just to climb your way up to the sewer.

Agreed. The people on pot usually drive slow, but they are still impaired. Colorado published an article a while back in which it stated that the amount of traffic accidents jumped significantly after they legalized pot, but the traffic fatalities went up only slightly...a statistically insignificant amount. (And before anyone jumps in with the "if it saves one life..." mantra, statistically insignificant in this case means that the increase in traffic fatalities was so slight that legalization of pot does not seem to be attributable to this slight increase.) If legalization of pot was found to lead to more traffic fatalities and/or serious injuries, I would be dead-set against it. As it is, I'm okay with legalization, just hope I don't get dents and scratches all over my truck.

I'm fine with legalization. I do fear though, of having more impaired drivers on the road. Of course, the worst drivers and most dangerous are the ones on their cell phones.

The perpetual victim. Do you know if you are descendant from slaves brought to the U.S.? Afterall, many Africans have immigrated to the U.S. after slavery ended. And my ancestors immigrated to the U.S. after slavery, so I don't owe you jack...even by your own victimhood standards. But I have a feeling you will continue to demand reparations from me. That's what happens with perpetual victims. Maybe I should try the victimhood tactic. I demand you pay back all of the tax money I've paid to fund social welfare programs. For the last 50 years this country was built on my back, and I demand repayment. And some of you people call me racist.

Finally, something we can agree on. It is very enjoyable watching the Liberals lose their minds and act like little whining 3rd graders...trying, but unable, to criticize every little aspect of Trump and family while turning a blind eye for eight years of blatant deceit and corruption from Obama. Yes, it is very enjoyable.

Remind me, who was the one crying in their safe space after the election?

The clearest sign of good times ahead is to see a Liberal in mental anguish. And lately the signs have been in abundance. The future is so bright I have to wear shades a welding helmet. BlueDove was right, Trump will provide comedians with plenty of material. I guess he didn't realize the source of the material was going to be Liberals acting bat-crap crazy over Trump's presidency. For some reason I can't wipe this perpetual grin off of my face. I know you are not supposed to laugh at the mentally handicapped, but man it is hard not to. Liberal after Liberal after Liberal have begun to show their utter incapability of comprehending their own flawed and hypocritical logic, and continue to spout the most absurd things. What a time to be a comic. Too bad most of them are Liberal and resort to cheap personal attacks on Trump and his family. If they had any sense they would realize a plethora of gold material is available just by watching the Liberal antics.

I'm with you on this. He needs to prosecute her. And I bet most on here agree.

What issue? There were six issues in my post. Please clarify. And do you feel like an internet tough guy by referring to Trump in that derogatory fashion? It doesn't bother me, but I kinda feel sorry for you if childish antics is all you have.

Mexico is paying for the wall. Trump said many times on the campaign trail that he would have Mexico pay for the wall. When questioned how the payment would be made he said that he has different options on forcing Mexico to pay. I, like most people, never took him to say that Mexico would pay for the initial construction. So that is not a lie. Repeal Obamacare. I'm pissed that it hasn't been repealed by now. He is caving into to hands of the whiney Liberals demanding replacement at the same time as repeal. Again, I'm pissed and want it repealed immediately. Drain the swamp. Draining the swamp IMO means getting rid of career politicians and replacing them with people that have real world experience. Attaboy for Trump on this one. Stop Iran and North Korea from developing weapons. We don't know what Trump is doing on this front. He did say he would rely on his top Generals. Prosecuting Hillary. I'm just as pissed about this one as the delay in repealing Obamacare. And the birther issue was brought up by Hillary's presidential campaign in 2007 when running against Obama. She owns it. Trump hired people to investigate, then after the investigation said he had no evidence of Obama being born in Kenya. He then later, on several occasions, brought the issue back up. So if you want to mock him on that issue, I'm fine with it and even agree with you. But no lives were lost or even hurt, which makes it frankly just a partisan attack. The Liberals want to attack Trump on this issue but let Hillary's Benghazi scandal slide in one ear and out the other with no resistance in-between..

Please point out some of your concerns about our administration. You keep spouting about lies but can't produce any. We've documented plenty of lies from the Obama administration for which you conspicuously were silent. Now you are wanting to shout from the rooftops about something that doesn't come close to approaching the incompetence and deceitfulness of the last administration. And Hillary was the originator of the Birther movement.

Wow Dove. You and your ilk have spouted about how Trump lies on a daily basis. You even started this thread saying you were going to document these daily lies. As of today, 6 days later, you have failed to document a single lie. You owe us six lies. I will join you whole-heartedly when you start pointing out when Trump goes wrong, but so far neither of us can list anything. I'm just hoping you don't lose all sanity like most of your Liberal brethren.

I would trust the Daily Caller over MSNBC, Huffington Post, Mother Jones, NBC, CNN, New York Times, Politifact and many, many other "news" sources...and I've never even been on that website (other than clicking on links from this site). Where do you get your news? The ladies on The View? Was the video altered by the Daily Caller? Did the Daily Caller inject some untruths or "fake news" into it's commentary on the video? Why do you care about the source of an unaltered video? Is it because you have nothing of substance to say so you counter with the old and pathetic strategy of attacking the messenger. Your stance about the source could be valid if there was something that the Daily Caller interjected that you objected to. But to just attack the source makes you the joke. LOL. And there's a reason the source of this video can only be found on "far Right" websites. The MSM and the far Left websites won't dare publish anything that doesn't conform to the wacked out agenda of the current Liberal/Socialist party, formerly known as the Democrat party. Luckily we have some on here that post links from these sites, otherwise you probably would have never heard of Ben Shapiro.

You would think after the shellacking that the Liberals took in the last few elections they would have figured out by now that the unsubstantiated race baiting is no longer working. Please keep spitting out this garbage, thus ensuring the Liberals will not be elected to anything in the near future. It has become abundantly clear which party is full of hate.

Again, for the 1000th time, who is ignoring anything? Who is denying anything? Who spouts about visual evidence of destruction then demands everyone believe that their causational views are correct and any dissenters are ignorant? I've stated clearly over and over, show me the evidence that man is the cause of this melting. Show me the evidence that this melting is detrimental to Earth's health. These satellite photos should have led to papers being published that show the effects of man on the environment. Please show these links. I bet you can't. This is equivocal to finding a pile of deer bones in the woods, and just spouting "A deer hunter shot him" without looking at any evidence of cause of death.

Let me add this. I'm sure some, probably many, on here are wandering why this is such a touchy issue with me. I'll try to explain. First, I'm more on the environmentalist side. I want clean lakes, rivers, bayous and all waterways. I live on the water and spend practically every weekend on various waterways throughout the southeastern U.S. (from San Antonio to Florida). I threatened to beat the a** of a fellow boater for sinking a beer can. (Luckily he just apologized and didn't take me up on my offer of physicality because I'm not sure if I could have whipped him.) I take the issue of a clean environment seriously. Which brings me to the second point. I have never been a fan of "the ends justify the means" mantra. I believe that if you tell the truth the "ends" will ultimately prevail. The whole Global Warming (and all of the predecessor theories) have had good intentions, which are for the human race to be cognizant and to be protective of man's footprint on our Earth. But the means by which the current leaders are implementing this goal are just downright disgraceful. Lie after lie after lie is issued to prey on the ignorance, naiveté, and laziness of the public to do their due diligence of minimal research on the topic. Which leads to the ultimate conclusion. When the majority of the public realizes that they are being lied to and manipulated by our leaders, the ultimate result will be resentment and to rebel against any environmental topic. This could very easily lead to a disdain for anybody that promotes a clean environment...which leads to more pollution. The "ends justify the means" mantra can create the opposite effect of the intended effect.

Wow. This topic has been on here for a full day, but not one single Global Warming alarmist will submit a single shred of evidence supporting the theory. All of you out there that accept but run and hide from this issue should think long and hard about spouting the lies associated with this theory at your next social function. You have had every opportunity over the last year, and were even challenged directly by me to support your claims, but have failed miserably. How can a theory have 97% of agreement but yet no evidence can be provided. So the next time this topic arises in your personal lives, think long and hard why you accept the claims of something you can't or won't defend in this little forum. The continual promotion of this theory is downright shameful, and you are guilty. Thanks baddog, SteveNash, Rebgp, and many of the others on here that dare question the pathetic attempt of wealth redistribution. And for those who still support the theory, you probably need to do a lot of soul searching concerning your leaders and their motives.

The more sources the better. Frankly, I think this topic should have mandatory daily postings until the climate change activists are exposed.

SteveNash posted this on Monday: Climate Change alarmists use pseudo science methodology based on altered data, then claim anyone that doesn't agree with them is a science denier. I think the first people who started using the word "putz" had these people in mind. Ever since the Man-made Global Warming theory has emerged, study after study after study has blown holes in the whole premise, pointed out shockingly bad methodology, exposed altered/manipulated data, demonstrated results that cannot be replicated, and shown that every single prediction model has been wildly wrong. But somehow these papers get scrubbed or buried by the media. I've read more credible studies that refute Man-made Global Warming than support it. I have a feeling this one will soon disappear like its predecessors. Hopefully Trump will bring this theory to a head by forcing the "scientists" to actually debate in a fair and open forum. Thanks baddog for bringing this topic back to the forum, so I can pose the same ol' question to anyone and everyone. (I almost posed this in SteveNash's post, but was too busy at the time) The theory of Man-made Global Warming is that the Earth is warming, this warming is caused by man, and that this warming is catastrophic to the ability of Earth to support life. Please, anyone, provide any shred of the foggiest amount of proof that man is the main culprit in temperature rise, and please attempt to show a sliver of evidence that this warming is even detrimental, much less catastrophic, to Earth's health. If 97% of the climatologists agree, along with all of the world leaders, proof should be a simple Bing (or Google) search away.

I find it interesting, but not surprising.

From the Article: "This goes back to the unconscionable decision of Republicans who refused to consider any nominee put forward by President Barack Obama following the death of Associate Justice Antonin Scalia. Obama nominated Merrick Garland, another eminently qualified candidate, who served as chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the second most important court in the nation. But in a decision that will go down as one of the greatest abuses of the Constitution in this nation’s history, the Senate’s Republican majority, under the leadership of their unprincipled majority leader, Mitch McConnell, declared they would not give Garland hearings, would not examine his qualifications and would not take a vote. Instead, they made up a rule: A nominee for the Supreme Court can be considered for only three-quarters of any president’s term. In the fourth year, confirmations have to wait until after the election. And so the Supreme Court has been hobbled for coming up on one year—and, because the confirmation hearings will inevitably drag on, it will be for months more to come." This is known as the Biden rule, in which Obama was a participant. [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] Does the author not know about this, or is he just a partisan hack who chooses to only become outrage at things based solely on whose side one is on. And if he is choosing to be outraged at unconscionable injustices, he should be ready to hang Harry Reid from the tallest tree. But I have a feeling Reid is a saint to this guy. Fake outrage and hypocrisy is once again on full display by these hacks.

Luckily Hillary didn't win the presidency...or we could have had Obama as the Supreme Court nominee. We dodged a bullet hellfire missile bunker buster bomb nuclear bomb.

I was in the process of reiterating this same sentiment. I almost copied your sentiments twice in the same thread. I will go with the old adage "great minds think alike".