Englebert

Are you sure about that second one?

As of now, Big12 is the only conference without a loss!

This coming from a person that is incorrect on practically every post.

The Clintons are in it for their gain. Being a politician has "earned" them millions upon millions of dollars. And please explain how you think Trump is in it for his gain. You might be right. I would like to hear your rationale. (Another example of my foolish optimism.)

Face it, you thought you had a hit piece but failed miserably.

How do we know he tried? You are the one making accusations. Show us your evidence that led you to the conclusion that Trump Winery didn't try to hire Americans. The burden of proof falls on the accuser...which happens to be you. Kids used to be taught that at elementary age. And yes, TVC is a nice source. Can you point to any accusations he has made then failed to provide evidence? Can you say the same about yourself? (Both questions are rhetorical, every one reading this already knows the answers.) I answered directly, no deflecting. Do you even know the meaning? Speaking of deflecting, show me where your article is evidence that Trump is not putting Americans back to work. Show me where your article is evidence Trump is not helping the middle class. Show me where your article is evidence that Trump is a liar. You want to see evidence of deflection, look no further than your post. It's hard to believe I feel obligated to waste two minutes of my life to answer such a childish post. For some reason I feel you will learn something while knowing full well nothing will change. Such foolish optimism.

No, a reputable source would say Australia's gun ban has brought gun murder rates down from minuscule to microscopic. No reputable source I have seen even tries to correlate the same rate of decline for robbery, rape, and other crimes. And none have attempted to calculate the exposure to foreign invasion. The "reputable" research is non-existent.

Yes, let's call out the hypocrites. Hypocrites are the ones that gave Hillary a pass on everything, now want to criticize Trump for seemingly similar behavior (in their biased hate-filled minds). And this article sounds like it was written by a little whiney, immature 8th grader. His "proof" starts with the contention that Trump said Goldman Sachs controls Ted Cruz. The author then tries to say Trump is a hypocrite for appointing Wall Street employees. How is this supposed to be hypocritical? The Liberal hypocrites are the ones that complain about Wall Street being these subhuman predators not worthy of life, all the while begging them for campaign donations. Trump said that he thinks Goldman Sachs can control Ted. How does that disqualify everyone from Wall Street being appointed to his cabinet? I quit reading after that whopper. Your continual picks of "newsworthy" sources just reinforces the already well-establish biased, uniformed, misinformed, hate-filled position you hold.

Here's a better (and extremely more trustworthy) source for the information: [Hidden Content] What makes you think that Trump Winery did not try to hire people from the U.S.? Do you have some secret inside information? To get these Visas the company has to demonstrate that American workers are not available. Have they failed in this? Should Trump Winery by-pass the Visa application process and just hire illegals (as TVC demonstrated in his post)? And why did you word the post the way you did? Do you think that Trump Winery was exporting the jobs? Do you not understand that these jobs are still here in the U.S.? "Bringing back jobs to America" means that certain jobs were lost to other countries and Trump wants to re-establish these jobs in the U.S. Trump Winery never exported jobs to other countries...they are still here in the U.S. Your post shows a complete lack of understanding of the subject. It doesn't even deserve the obligatory "nice try"...especially after TVC just ripped your original postulation to shreds.

Can you name a vote that didn't count? Please point out someone's vote that didn't count. I bet you can't name a single one. If you are playing volleyball and score 25 points in the first game, do any of those points not count? Same as in tennis. Your lack of understanding of the Electoral College system is mind-boggling, especially when the system has been analyzed on every talk show since the election. I guess that's what happens when your only source of "news" is far left political hack sources. Should a few big cities with no diversity of thought dictate who governs the rest of the country?

I picked mine as an homage to Engelbert Humperdinck. He gave Jimi Hendrix his start. I can't imagine the audience's reaction back in 1966 when attending a concert by a straight-laced lily-white crooner, and out comes this black, huge afro, left handed psychedelic electric guitar player to open the gig (Psychedelic music at the time was big amongst the younger generation but was considered taboo for mainstream...the exact audience that would attend an Engelbert Humperdinck concert). Humperdinck took a huge chance of racial backlash, but was convinced Hendrix's talent would carry the day. I had been using the username for years before I realized I was using the wrong spelling. By that time I figured it was too hard to change it.

I doubt if any could reach a number without a preceding ".".

I wonder if Michelle was trying to make a reference to Hitler's Youth.

Anybody with a clue would understand! Victory number three. He should rub the snot-nosed little whiney sunflowers face in victory...then give'em a participation trophy. But he has more class than that, unlike the previous anointed one.

It is abundantly clear who doesn't have a clue.

Who are you calling a liar? You have been asked multiple times and you have refused to answer. I have also asked you many times to answer this question: Since you seem to be outraged at Putin for trying to influence the American elections, are you also outraged at Obama for trying to influence the Israeli elections? I've posed this question to you multiple times on this thread but you have refused to answer...is this not truthful?

Yes, China is laughing at Obama.

Most Wonderful Time In 8 Years:

Recently Obama has stated some unbelievable whoppers. For brevity I'll just pick three. Which lie do you think should be awarded "Biggest lie of 2016": (I added the links because the comments are so delusional some will deny he ever uttered these claims.) 1. Obama said the country is better off now and is more respected by every country. Please name a single country that thinks the United States is a stronger nation now than 8 years ago. [Hidden Content] And what is hilarious is that Politifact actually tries to back up this preposterous claim. I guess they used the same pollsters that said Hillary would win by 8-15 percentage points: [Hidden Content] 2. Obama said he personally met with Putin regarding the Russian hacks and told Putin to "cut it out". I'm sure if this really happened Obama would be sporting the same face of Harry Reid while Josh Earnest would be telling us Obama accidently used Reid's exercise machine. Or it is possible that Obama didn't give the whole context of the situation. It is possible that Obama was on his knees begging: "Please, please, please oh honorable Putin, please don't hack our systems." I'm not sure what was actually said, but I can't imagine anyone with more than two functioning brain cells actually believing Obama was bullying Putin. [Hidden Content] 3. Obama said Obamacare is working. Delusions of grandeur or just a flat out lie? [Hidden Content]

Contrary to the Left's belief that Trump is a liar, that domain is clearly dominated by the Left. Here is a progress chart for 16 celebrities to keep their word of moving to Canada, else be labelled a true liar: [Hidden Content]

A Connecticut High School bans use of "White" in sports chants: [Hidden Content] I'm guessing this school also has therapy dogs and Play-doh for the depressed snowflakes. Why do these people insist that all white people are racist and are out to dominate minorities? Do these jack-wagons think these type of acts will bring the races closer together? I'm sure this principal knows nothing about the "self-fulfilling prophecy". Then again, I guess this could bring races closer together. I'm sure everyone can agree this principal is an overpaid twit.

Are you as outraged at Obama for trying to influence the Israeli elections? Such a simple question that only a hypocrite will refuse to answer.

Name some lies and I will counter with Obama's lies. Like I said, you will spout untruths and we will shoot them down and you will move on to another topic. Nothing new, although I'm shocked you even attempted this one.

And as usual we will shoot down your untrue assertions and you will run and hide. Nothing new here.

Just as I thought Big Girl. I've asked you this question twice in this post and you run and hide. I'll try again. Are you outraged that Obama tried to influence the Israeli elections? Are you seriously going to run from a simple question?