Englebert

Please enlightened us as to your brilliant psychological assessment that leads you to believe Trump is a bully. I sure could use another laugh.

We couldn't expect anything less from you. Like you said in an earlier post about Trump, your true character is on full display.

So you are one of those people who think the Chicago Cubs and Cleveland Indians should play Game 8 because the series is tied 27-27 in runs. How embarrassing.

Did the Rockefeller family once own slaves? How many minorities and women did Rockefeller employ? Did Rockefeller give his workers paid maternity leave, paid paternity leave, paid sick time, paid vacations, healthcare, retirement packages? Did Rockefeller allow his employees to unionize? Did Rockefeller engage in unethical business practices, including price fixing and collusion? Come on, you love to hold people accountable for actions 50+ years ago. Is this part of your selective memory you are so fond of accusing others of having?

Speaking of true character, didn't your hero (besides Hannity) look directly into the camera and say to the American people "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." And true character is someone resorting to childish names when so much relevant material exists. It is amazing how you constantly spew hatred towards Trump, but the only thing you can come up with is "grab um". Man you must feel embarrassed. I feel embarrassed for you. I think even Big Girl feels embarrassed for you.

Politico is known for fudging facts so I would like to see that story verified from another source. Not saying it isn't true, I'm saying I don't trust Politico. Most stories with headlines like this end up having a totally different story, and I'm not interested enough to chase the facts. The second link sounds like someone who got overextended and the bank did their job. The article illustrates that lady could not pay her mortgage because her tenants could not pay her. In the same vein, the banks cannot pay their creditors if their customers do not pay them. I didn't see any mention of Mnuchin being a lobbyist in either article. And I don't believe that a person that has made a lot of money is the devil and is out to throw little old ladies out on the street.. So again, why do you think Mnuchin is part of "the swamp"? He's not a Washington D.C. insider and not a career politician. Do you believe that all bankers are automatically disqualified from holding office? Frankly, I'm more concerned about his ties to Hollywood.

I would have to read a little more about him. But according to the article you posted, he sounds okay to me. He's not a Washington D.C. insider and is not a career politician. I don't adhere to the Liberal position that Wall Street represents the devil. Why do you think Mnuchin is part of "the swamp"?

Trump is off to a great start. How do I know? Liberals are whining, crying, throwing hissy fits, telling lies and shouting racism. Nothing unusual about that, but the degree is continually intensifying. Proof positive Trump is off to a great start.

How is Mnuchin considered part of "the swamp"? Liberals are the ones railing against Wall Street (while taking their fat donations). I don't remember Trump or frankly anyone in the GOP demonizing Wall Street as the enemy. That is the domain of the Liberals. And according to the article, Mnuchin worked for Soros then left him. And he is not a Washington D.C. insider and has no political experience. So again, how is Mnuchin considered part of the "the swamp"? Sounds like an awful lot of failed Liberal spin...which is par for the course.

Like Obamacare that was designed to hurt 310,000,000 people to help 20,000,000 people? I do believe Trump will pass policies based on Conservative principles, but will also pass some things that are Socialistic. I have very little faith in a Republican controlled government. I have absolute zero faith in Liberals controlling anything.

We whined, cried and complain about Obama and the Democrats failed policies. You whine, cry and complain about things that happened 50+ years ago. The Republicans had to rectify the Democrat racist policies of the past, now have to rectify the failed Democrat policies of the present.

If anyone knows anything about hate it would be you and the Liberals. And just like the current Democrat party, your analytical skills are atrocious. Please keep appointing and re-electing the hate-filled Liberals. The GOP will keep introducing new ideas and the Liberals will keep screaming racism.

Would that matter to you? You voted for a presidential candidate that did ten times worse for what Patraeus was convicted. It didn't matter to you for the simple fact that Hillary has a "D" behind her name. It is shameful that you can ignore an treasonous act of an elitist but feel the need to silence a person you know nothing about.

How about educating yourself. Here's some reading material to start with: [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] A simple Bing search will give you a plethora of reading material. But none can't quantify with verifiable data the number of lives saved through actual defensive gun use or a deterrent effect. I actually came to the realization of what LOL really means when thinking if you would take the time to educate yourself on the topic.

Then why do you have Hannity's poster on the ceiling above your bed? Just admit you have a crush on Hannity. It is obvious to everyone on this board.

Your party just re-elected Nancy Pelosi to minority speaker. I can't believe anyone would possibly have the nerve to try and disparage anyone else after that brain-dead vote. I'm so glad to see the Liberals hanging on with a death grip of the Democrat Party. You know, the party that has failed policies and just throws personal insults at anyone that disagrees with them. You appear to fit right in.

The group that voted for and approved Affirmative Action Laws, desegregation, trillions of dollars in welfare programs, diversity in every facet of life...is this the group to which you are referring?

Yes you are correct on selective memory. That skill is the pure domain of the Liberal hypocrites. Somehow Huffington Post is trying to rewrite history, creating a false memory, that there were millions of people rioting and looting under the guise of protesting Obama's legitimacy as president. How do you read this crap? Better yet, do you really think we are so weak minded that we will fall for this? I guess the real definition of "enlightened" is easily manipulated. The author is an embarrassment to 6th graders everywhere.

I'm curious as to whether nappyroots will attribute Trump's position as flip-flopping or evolving. Since he feels the "R" and "D" are blurred in this case, he might have trouble figuring which attribute to label Trump. He might have to actually think for once. On second thought, nah...he will just wait for the Liberal leaders to tell him which way to think.

Wow, that's from before Clinton and Obama were staunchly against gay marriage.

Huffington Post espouses their full-blown spin and distortion as their Liberal sheeple eat up the lies like candy. Halloween Part 2 for the easily manipulated. Why don't you find the same story on a respectable news outlet and read what is really going on. I know that is an unfathomable task for you. For some reason you seem content with just shining the boots of your Liberal spin masters.

Does anybody on this planet give a flying flip about what Seth Meyers has to say?

Material will be less than what was available from the last 8 years, but the comedians will now be allowed to comment on it without being labelled racist.

That article is hilarious. The first paragraph says that the U.S. was a laughingstock in 2008. Everyone knows we didn't become a laughingstock until after Obama assumed office, started implementing his failed policies and went on his apology tour. One of the first "accomplishments" states that he appointed an IT CIO to oversee spending and efficiency. It seems the author omitted the fact that this chief oversaw the failed rollout of the Obamacare website, which by the way, crashed on rollout, cost the American taxpayers 2 billion dollars and still rising, was developed by a Canadian based company who's senior vice-president went to school and is friends with Michelle Obama, gathers and stores American citizens personal information but fails to employ adequate security...I could go on for days, but the author thinks this is an "accomplishment". I had to stop right there. Did you actually read this list of "accomplishments"? And if so, I am very curious as to why you felt the need to post a link. Are you as embarrassed for the author as I am? Bless his little heart. At least he tried. Failed miserably, but a least he tried. Let's all joined together and see if we can get him a participation trophy. [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content]

So you believe some people are elitist and above the law. That is shameful. And I dare you to find anyone on here that would say Dick Cheney should not be held accountable if he committed unlawful acts. Your attempt at moral equivalency is pathetic at best. And our president elect has also said (many times) he wants to lock her up. It's odd how you can hear a never-ending flip-flop but only hear to point you want to hear. That ability must be a side effect of Liberal Disease Syndrome.