Englebert

Uh-oh, looks like someone else has a man-crush on Hannity and Rush. Do you have their posters on your ceiling like new tobie?

Clap.

I'm curious, if hell freezes over and they do carve Obama's face into Mount Rushmore, what color would his face be?

How do you feel? Should she be locked up if found that she indeed commit unlawful acts, just as others have been locked up? I'm very curious to know if you think the rule of law should apply to everyone or if you will continue to bow and obey your party leaders wishes. Please enlighten us. It is a very, very simple question and no need for your usual avoidance.

And this is why your party got kicked to the curb. They are as delusional as you.

You hit the nail on the head, except you aimed it at the wrong party. If the Democrat leaders would stop calling the non-protected people racist, misogynist, bigots, homophones, xenophobes, deplorables, etc., etc., etc. and stop accepting hate groups into their party...the groups that display the most vile imaginable whenever someone doesn't bow and conform to their warped way of thinking. Most non-minorities are sick of the constant unfounded accusations, especially from the likes of hate-filled Liberals. It's ironic and pathetic that the Party Of Hate spews copious amounts of vitriol at non-minorities for racial stereotyping, but are the ones guilty of placing their little labels on everyone imaginable. What a sad and deeply depressing shock it is to those who eventually come to the realization that the party they thought was so righteous is guilty of everything they preach against. The others will just continue to live in denial.

I'm showing 11 [11 man] programs besides WOS. Which ones did I get wrong? Amarillo (27: 1933-1935, 27:1935-1937) Bremond (29: 1981-1982, 31:2014-2015) Celina (68: 1998-2002, 31: 2005-2006) Crawford (24: 1961-1963, 29: 2004-2005) Euless Trinity (27: 2007-2008, 28: 2009-2010) Katy (4) (27: 1958-1960, 32: 1997-1999, 24: 2003-2004, 31: 2012-2013) Lake Travis (48: 2007-2010, 25: 2010-2012) Mart (26: 1968-1970, 30: 1999-2000) Southlake Carroll (4) (28: 1988-1989; 33: 1992-1994, 31: 2002-2003, 49: 2004-2007) Stephenville (32: 1993-1994, 26: 1998-1999) Tyler (26: 1972-1974, 27: 1994-1995) West Orange-Stark (24: 1986-1988, 23: 2015-Present)

I think Fort Hancock is one. And I think Amarillo is another. [Just saw someone else posted this one.]

I'm out of likes. And many, even some on this board, will still believe Obama received far more criticism and was the target of hate more that Trump.

If you could comprehend you would realize that nobody on this board ignored anything. In fact, the consensus on this board was that he was the second worse candidate in history, but was blessed by running against the worst candidate in history. The Liberals have no one to blame but themselves, but keeping in form, Liberals always resort to pointing the finger at someone else. Your post isn't worth the usual courtesy clap. Try and put a little more thought into the next one.

Because he has to work with Congress to repeal it. Read a little bit some time. Ooops, I forgot. Clap.

Clap.

You can't post them all day. You can find one every now and again but ignore the ones that don't fit your narrative. That's considered lying by omission. Do you realize that you've posted so many falsehoods on this board that most can agree that whatever you post can safely be considered false before reading. I'm curious as to why you still post. You've been called out so many times to which a normal person would be embarrassed beyond comprehension. But you continue to persevere. I keep thinking of a poor comic on stage in which every joke fails but keeps delivering them to the end. At some point you just have to feel bad for him and give him the "bless his little heart" courtesy clap. Clap.

I couldn't get through the bile of the first paragraph. That author is an embarrassment to himself and our country. Do you actually believe this crap or did you post the link for entertainment purposes?

We condemned the practice and put a stop to it. What have you done?

Has anyone denied that these measures were not beneficial? Has anyone, and I mean anyone (including this upcoming administration) proposed allowing refineries to resume emitting known poisonous and harmful pollutants? Please show proof of your contentions. I am willing to bet you have no proof and you are just employing your usual strategy of stereotyping. And if scientists declared that the carbon dioxide emitting from your mouth is harmful to the environment would you stop breathing?

Yeah, you may be right about the point being to show the effects. I have seen many, many videos, pictures and illustrations showing similar things. I guess I'm just jaded because I constantly see stuff like this with the caption "Look what man is doing to our precious earth" and when asked to show where man is the cause the response is always "Well you are just a low-down denier". I'm not sure what you mean about if "it" exists. If by "it" you mean global warming, many, many studies have shown no "significant" warming has occurred or is occurring. I don't know of anyone that doesn't believe the climate changes. My stance on warming is "I have no idea". I do know the raw data used has been altered, skewed and manipulated. I do know that we have very little reliable data from 50+ years ago and that many climatologists infer lots of data with highly sketchy reasons. I do know that every single model these experts have developed and use have been wildly inaccurate. (Not most...all) I do know that many people claim the debate is over, which flies in the face and is completely contrary to scientific standards. I'm all for the continued research, but I'm totally against changing our way of life and disrupting our economy (except for common sense pollution reduction) when cause cannot be established, therefore governmental proposed "solutions" cannot be determined in any stretch of the imagination to be beneficial or actually harmful.

I finally watched the video in it's entirety and I have to admit I was shocked. Shocked that HBO spent untold amounts of money on a film that had to use poor ol' crazy Uncle Joe Biden to try and prove a scientific point...a point that it didn't attempt to give a cause. I guess the film maker decided not to attempt specific predictions because every time the Man-Made Global Warmers do this they end up with egg on their face when every single one of their prediction models prove to be wildly inaccurate. HBO spent a lot of money in stating "the climate changes". Captain Obvious would be proud. I'm also shocked that they chose to leave out the linkage of man to global warming, other than a few one-liners saying "man is the cause". I'm sure if Man-Made Global Warming theorists had any shred of empirical evidence of man's central role in earth's changing climate than those shining nuggets would have been included. Why would anyone leave out key information. If we ever go into another full scale war, the U.S. needs to hire some of these people for the Department of Propoganda Administration.

I did notice you used the word "denier" in your earlier post. Like I've said over and over, no one is "denying" anything. All I'm asking for is proof that man is the main culprit (as the theory states). To do this, one must also study factors other than man. There are many other contributors to changes in Earth's weather, and to say man is the main cause is a confession of the true "denier". A denier is one that says man is the cause while discounting volcanos. A denier is one that says man is the cause while discounting the moon's fluctuating orbit and tug on the earth. A denier is one that says man is the cause while discounting earth's fluctuating axis tilt and fluctuating orbit around the sun. A denier is one that says man is the cause while discounting solar activity (which I believe will ultimately prove to be the main driving force behind the changes in earth's weather patterns.) A denier is one that says man is the cause and the debate is over. And since I've read so many propaganda theories on Man-Made Global Warming, I'm highly uninterested in wasting 42 minutes of my life on another one that is sure to be disappointing. A big help and time saver would be for someone to post the times in the video that deal with the above mentioned factors. I am highly interested to watch the part that proves solar activity is not the main driving force of climate change, but am also interested in learning how the fluctuations in earth's and moon's orbit are proved to also have negligible effects. I feel the need to restate my position (and many others). No one is and has ever denied climate change is occurring. Along with common observations, videos and research papers have adequately documented this. But none have one iota of proof that man is the main driving force behind this change, or that any changes in man's activities will curtail this change. Common sense dictates that man is not the culprit considering earth's climate has fluctuated wildly before man graced the earth with our presence, and climate will change once man has run his course. But no one is denying man could be the main factor. Show me the proof. It's like a prosecutor spending three weeks proving a murder has been committed, then points at the defendant and says "He's the culprit". The jury can get behind the prosecutor in the fact that a murder was committed, but would be highly derelict in their duty if they chose to prosecute the defendant with no evidence that he was the one that committed the proven act. And not one study can adequately document whether this change in weather is detrimental or possibly helpful to the longevity of a hospitable climate. In keeping with the above analogy, who's to say that the murder was not a good thing. After all, the "victim" could have been named Hitler and his demised ultimately proved to save millions of lives. One part of the Man-Made Global Warming theory that I (and everyone) can support and believe as proven fact beyond reproach is that the southern winds coming up from the Gulf Of Mexico has increased in intensity over the last 100 years. It is undeniable due to the fact that OU sucks.

I couldn't watch all of this. I tried, I really did. I skipped through parts. But from everything I did watch, it is the same old same old. (That's why I skipped through much of it.) I'll go back and try and watch it later. But I'm not very optimistic any new information will be gleaned. If you hadn't already, read the link that Reagan posted. And that viewpoint is not some off-the-wall outlier. There are many studies and research papers that cast doubt to flat out rejecting the Man-Made Global Warming theory. They are just harder to find since they don't fit the narrative. If a researcher came to HBO and said I want to do a story disproving Man-Made Global Warming, do you think HBO would film it?

Like I said, you have no conscious or self respect. Pitiful!

You've been caught in so many lies I am shocked you have the nerve to get on here and spread more. I guess life is good when you have no conscious and self-respect.

Sounds like a bunch of little sunflowers sitting in the audience that probably didn't even vote. I guess they thought Pence and Family invaded their safe space, so they displayed their hate. I encourage the Party Of Hate to keep going with their segregationist platform. This will allow Republicans to win every election for the foreseeable future. Do you think the audience was being racist? What would your reaction be if Obama was booed while sitting in the audience?

KKK members must be opened minded, since they voted for Obama twice. Looks like Obama was the KKK's previous party of choice. Hillary was such a bad candidate even they disavowed her.

Did you read the article? It debunked a Leftist propaganda lie. It should have been apparent when the caption states that Republicans are blaming food stamps for the debt. Not one Republican believes that asinine statement. Seems Liberals will believe anything for that to be circulating.