Englebert

WTH! I've posed dozens of questions to you that you couldn't answer, and you have the nerve to attempt to call out someone on this? Seriously?!!!!

Astonishing to who? How about you start a poll asking who shows the most ignorance on this board. I don't know what the results would be, but I can guarantee I know who will win.

Has anyone on this board denied that? Can you name a Trump supporter on this board? There might be, but basically everyone on here has publically stated their desire to vote against Hillary by casting their vote for Trump. That would be the anti-Hillary vote. Somehow you, new tobie and Big Girl cannot comprehend that simplistic concept.

I have no clue as to what you are trying to say. Please elaborate.

Compared to who? Have you looked at the test scores from past generations to see where you family ranks? And even if your family has higher test scores than past generations, the irrefutable data shows a steady drop in test scores across the country. When you made your statement you where making a general statement about kids. Are you now trying to limit the conversation to just your family in a pathetic attempt to justify your assertion?

If the seasoned cardiologist killed every patient he operated on, why wouldn't you give the professional mechanic a chance? At least the mechanic has shown competence in something. And why wouldn't the cardiologist not be in jail for behavior that would land any other non-elitist in jail?

What do you think is the cause of the correlation between kids getting along much better than previous generations and the drastic drop in test scores compared to other countries?

Hold on just a darn minute. E comes before P so I should be the undisputed runner-up. I thought I had second place easily wrapped up but got massacred this last week. My worst week by far for the whole year. Congrats Mr. Ump. I was hoping to catch you but got caught myself. Instead of getting first I have to settle for a tie for first loser.

Are you talking about the people that passed Civil Rights legislation? Are talking about the people that passed Affirmative Action laws? Are you talking about the people that have donated trillions of dollars toward minority causes? Are you talking about the people that voted a black man into the Oval Office, and voted in minorities in many other offices around the country? And please pick one person on this board you feel is racist and let's analyze his/her posts to see if their posts contain proof of racism or just figments of your imagination. How about picking me, since I get called racist on a regular basis. I have a serious question for you. If I disagree with a black man's (or woman's, or any minority's) point of view, how can I express my opposition without being called a racist? Please give me a detailed set of instructions. I have learned that disagreeing with a minority will get you branded a racist the majority of the time. Rarely to almost never by the person in which I'm having the discussion, but from Liberals...both white and non-white. So to avoid these vicious attacks, I would like to know the proper way to express my beliefs without being labeled with this hateful term. So far I've been unable to ascertain this "proper" conduct.

I know it is unrealistic and probably stupid to ask, but do you have any proof to back your assertions?

If you don't want to hear the whining, vote for Trump. On second thought, I (and probably everybody on this board) will still be complaining. Tuesday will just determine who the whining will be directed towards.

From what I have heard, someone said that they were able to eliminate the duplicates by using a computer program, and that the majority were duplicates...thus greatly cutting down the amount of emails the FBI needed to look at. I don't remember who made that statement or where I heard/read it, or if it's from any hint of a reliable source. I have no clue as to how many of Hillary's emails the FBI already possessed, but they would have had to possess more than I thought for this to be plausible.

What's the "Really!" supposed to mean. Really, please explain. Of course you will have to remove your blinders and ear plugs to respond.

1. Beaumont West Brook/Conroe 2. Lufkin/Montgomery 3. Baytown Sterling/Channelview 4. Crosby/New Caney 5. Porter/Barbers Hill 6. Nederland/Port Neches-Groves 7. Port Arthur Memorial/Vidor 8. Bridge City/Huffman Hargrave 9. Little Cypress-Mauriceville/Navasota 10. Madisonville/Tarkington 11. Shepherd/Bellville 12. Hardin-Jefferson/Hamshire-Fannett 13. Coldspring-Oakhurst/Woodville 14. Kirbyville/Buna 15. Anahuac/East Chambers 16. Hitchcock/La Marque 17. Garrison/Corrigan-Camden 18. Groveton/Lovelady 19. Sabine Pass/Evadale 20. Iola/Hull-Daisetta 21. Beaumont Central/Baytown Lee 22. Beaumont Ozen/Livingston 23. Silsbee/Cleveland 24. Diboll/Jasper 25. West Orange-Stark/Orangefield

So somehow it is immoral for each individual to give his opinion. Why are you trying to suppress the rights of people with differing opinions? Are you suggesting implementing a quota system on how many opinions can come from either side of a topic? And do you want to adopt the current quota system in which "too many" can only be one-sided? And why are you the perpetual victim?

To clarify drewlsu's post: If HJ wins they will represent the district as the third place team. If they lose they will be out of the playoffs. If HF wins they will represent the district as the fourth place team. If they lose they will be out of the playoffs.

You said it. Selective outrage at its finest. Liberals own that behavior. Conservatives might want to learn this technique but I don't think their conscious would let them implement the practice.

Such selective and fake outrage. Typical Liberal.

I think this actually illustrates the immigration topic through the eyes of Liberals. Many, if not most, Liberals believe that those against illegal immigration hate the immigrants, when in fact most hate the burden placed on our society. Either way it is definitely funny.

I've been saying for years that the power to pardon and commute sentences should be stripped from Presidents and Governors. I think the President (and Governors) should only have to power to order a new trial, not pardon or commute.

I agree. If it is true that the President can pardon themselves, then that power needs to be stripped immediately. I don't know if it would take a constitutional amendment, but it needs to be gone. And as with any law, a few legal expert's opinions doesn't really mean squat. I would like to hear from the Supreme Court.

I guess people will have different opinions as to where they want Hillary to go.

Trump should use this slogan over and over and over.

I've heard a few legal "experts" say that if Hillary wins the presidency, she can pardon herself. I heard one say she cannot. Anyone with an once of moral fiber would resign, but I don't see Hillary doing that.

I don't know the answer for a fact, but I'm fairly confident that anyone can run while under investigation. The U.S. Justice system is setup as "innocent until proven guilty". Preventing anyone from running for office while under investigation flies in the face of this. Same thing as creating a list to prevent someone from buying a gun that is under investigation. The practice could would be severely abused in short order. For example, if you and I were running for the same office, I could photoshop some photos of you engaging in illegal activity, then present them to law enforcement days before the election (or some other kind of trumped-up evidence that would take a minimum of a few days of investigation.) Even though you would be exonerated, the race would be over. This happens all the time by candidates trying to sway voters opinions, but shouldn't legally prevent someone from running.