Englebert

Really? You would love to debate him? You can't even debate anyone on this site. You continually refuse to answer questions posed to you, then make the same absurd statements that were rebuked in which you couldn't or wouldn't defend. Case in point...my previous post to you. You won't answer, you can't answer, but somehow have the arrogance to say you can debate a presidential nominee.

She gets her news from Huffington Post, Mother Jones, Politfact and who knows what uber-left wing news sources, so she's still in the dark on this revelation.

I agree 100%. SECEDE NOW!!!

Your use of a "point spread" emphatically shows your failure to comprehend my post. If you were the defendant in a court of law and the judge asked you to give up your right to appeal before the proceedings even occurred, would you acquiescent to that? Better yet, let's use your expertise as an example. If you were about to undergo surgery, would you consent to not suing the RN, Doctor, or Hospital if the surgery went wrong...due to negligence that was discovered after the surgery? That is, would you give up your right to sue beforehand no matter what the outcome of your surgery?

I didn't really watch the debate. I had it on my TV, but was working on my computer and it was just background noise. But I shifted my attention when Chris Wallace asked Trump if he would accept the election results. I'm flabbergasted as to what this question was supposed to be about. For example, if I was a head football coach and the head official came to me before the game and asked "Are you going to accept the results of this game?" I guess my response would be "Are you asking me to give up my right to protest the game before the game is ever played?" Or if I was in a court of law and before the proceedings started the judge asked "Are you going to accept the results of the decision of this court?" Again, my response would be "Are you trying to make me forfeit my right to appeal?" I don't know why that question was asked and why so many people are showing interest in it.

1. The Woodlands/Conroe 2. Barbers Hill/New Caney 3. Crosby/Splendora 4. Kingwood Park/Dayton 5. Beaumont Central/Port Neches-Groves 6. Beaumont Ozen/Lumberton 7. Port Arthur Memorial/Livingston 8. Vidor/Baytown Lee 9. Little Cypress-Mauriceville/Huffman Hargrave 10. Silsbee/Bridge City 11. Tatum/Jasper 12. Madisonville/Brookshire Royal 13. Hamshire-Fannett/Orangefield 14. Hardin-Jefferson/Liberty 15. Warren/Trinity 16. Woodville/Kountze 17. Anahuac/Hempstead 18. East Chambers/La Marque 19. Corrigan-Camden/Newton 20. Alto/San Augustine 21. Joaquin/Price Carlisle 22. Centerville/Lovelady 23. Deweyville/West Hardin 24. Sabine Pass/Hull-Daisetta 25. Beaumont Legacy Christian/Houston Northland Christian

Kenneth Hall from Sugarland. Never panned out at Texas A&M. He held the national all-time rushing yards for about 60 years.

1. Port Neches-Groves/Port Arthur Memorial 2. Buna/Woodville 3. Union Hill/High Island 4. West Brook/Lufkin 5. Atascocita/Summer Creek 6. Dayton/Crosby 7. Humble/Barbers Hill 8. Livingston/Vidor 9 Lumberton/Central 10. Bridge City/Little Cypress-Mauriceville 11. Huffman/Cleveland 12. Diboll/Huntington 13. Brookshire Royal/Tarkington 14. West Orange-Stark/Hardin-Jefferson 15. Kirbyville/Warren 16. Hardin/East Chambers 17. Hempstead/Hitchcock 18. Crockett/Corrigan-Camden 19. Newton/Garrison 20. Price Carlisle/Alto 21. West Sabine/Centerville 22. Iola/Sabine Pass 23. Orange Community Christian/Alvin Living Stones 24. Nederland/Ozen 25. Shepherd/Madisonville

Can I come with you? I have a ladder to get over the wall.

Don't forget "Deplorable".

I was getting a buffer to skip through the commercials. Was reading this forum until I got at least 20 minute buffer. I can't go to the college boards until I catch up to live TV. OU sucks even on this forum.

I just went back and reviewed what you wrote. I thought you said I had diabetes when you actually said "How are you not diabetic". My bad, I missed the "NOT" part of it. I apologize. Now back to the topic. Wait. What is the topic?

Maybe you should look up the word diabetes. Comprehension seems to have turned against you. But please keep trying. I have all day.

So calling me diabetic when you know nothing of my health issues is not considered a personal attack? Frankly I don't mind. In fact, I even expect it. Sure sign of someone that can't defend his point. And I curious as to your motivation and attitude. Did you just try to argue that you are here to help me? If that is your contention, no thanks.

So no examples, no rebuttals, just personal attacks. You must be absorbing way too much Liberalism theology.

The Green Bay clown could beat Hillary right now. But after the Left wing biased media gets through with him, he wouldn't be able to beat Charlie Manson.

FIFY

According to the article you posted, Fox News lies or spouts half truths 78% of the time. Why not just turn on the channel and find one of these examples. If Politifact is truthful, this exercise should take no more than two minutes.

The very first example in the article is giving Hannity a "mostly false" rating for saying a stand-down order was given. He has had some of the soldiers themselves saying that is absolutely true. So it looks like Politifact is the one that deserves the "pants on fire" rating. And yes, we would like some substantial proof other than a far left extremely biased web-site that has a much credibility as Hillary. Maybe try the National Enquirer.

Yes, I know. But considering the amount of time he is fixated on Hannity, I believe it is a little man crush. Maybe a huge man crush.

I've been saying all along that Trump is really a Democrat. I guess this video just confirms it.

Ask Bill Clinton. If anyone would know about sexual assault, it would be him.

Bla bla bla. Have anything interesting to add to the conversation or is unsubstantiated flapping your only goal? You might fit right in on this forum.

I've never defended him on anything. I knew he was an uncouth guy from the beginning. But he is not a racist. And what you misdiagnose as me defending Trump is actually me calling out the obvious lies and hypocrisy of those attacking him.

Frankly I'm shocked at the reaction of the media to the video. The Left wing media has been portraying Trump as a racist, misogynist, bigot, clown, arrogant, liar, and any other negative adjective you can think of. Now a video comes out showing him engaging in locker room talk and the media acts shocked. Sounds like a whole lot of fake outrage to me.