Englebert

I will vote for whoever hurts Hillary's chances more. I would vote for Koko The Gorilla over Hillary. I'm dead serious. While y'all are laughing, I will explain. Koko's only ability would be to basically keep the status quo. I feel Hillary will inflict (more) major damage to this country. Koko will not have the ability to nominate a Supreme Court nominee. Koko will not have the ability to enact more of the Global Warming Lie legislation. Koko will not try to limit/eliminate 2nd Amendment rights. Koko will not have the ability to raise taxes. Koko will not try to turn this country more socialist than it's become. Koko will not have the ability to do a lot of things Hillary wants to do. Although this country severely needs a new direction, Koko at least would not have the ability to inflict more damage. Now, since it's clear I don't want Hillary in office, I must choose the best strategy to prevent her from occupying the White House. Johnson (or any of the other third party choices) has zero chance of beating either candidate. Therefore, a vote for third party means one less vote in opposition to Hillary. (No flawed logic here.) If Johnson was a more viable candidate, I would love to vote for him. I strongly disagree with some of his policies, but I also align with many of them. Same with Trump. I don't align with any of Hillary's policies...none that I can think of. I would not be opposed to any non-Liberal, and I do mean any (including the clinically insane) gaining the White House over any Progressive Liberal. My choices will start with whoever is the most Capitalistic and working my way down to a slug before a Progressive Liberal. So to answer your question, I would consider a third party candidate. But that candidate would have to have a reasonable chance of preventing the Liberal from gaining the White House. My answer pertains to this election only. I would love for this country to move to three or even four major parties. I don't see it happening in the near future, but the upside would be terrific. The problem is that the choices are basically dichotic...big government versus small government control. Everything else takes a back seat. Any third party that emerges will pull their majority of voters from one side, thus allowing the other side to dominate. A fourth party could combat that, but then one side will conglomerate to emerge as a superparty again. The other side would then pool, thus going back to two major parties. The best option would be to have about twenty choices in every election, choices up and down the spectrum. But many parties/politicians will always convince voters that we need the "together we stand" strategy to prevent the other side from winning, which will always lead back to a two party system.

I have a feeling this idea was concocted at a meeting of the U.N. "big wigs", who each flew their private 747s thousands of miles to attend, all while sitting around a table feasting on filet mignon. And if the effects of greenhouse gasses are of such dire concern, I want to know when the U.N. will ban volcanoes. Maybe we should tax all countries that have a volcano erupt within their borders. And for a serious question, do countries have a contest to see who can send the biggest morons as their U.N. representatives?

I can't even imagine the media outrage this would have sparked had it been the Bush administration. Calls for impeachment would be the headlines on every outlet.

So Obama should resign immediately for not knowing the U.S. has only 50 states. Hillary should remove herself as candidate because as Head Of State she did not possess the skill set to identify classified material when presented. Who is pathetic? (That is obviously a rhetorical question.)

I'm not very adventurous when trying exotic or strange foods. I grew up with Cajun friends so I have eaten some things: Blackbird Squirrel Coon Nutria Gar Dog food (had to try it once) Had to swallow my pride a few times.

His strategy is "Apologize for being the United States and promise that we won't call them any 'hurtful' names."

I think that looks more like a smirk. The volcano is saying to global warming nutjobs, "What dumbarses. I spew more CO2 into the atmosphere than anything, but the President and his administration want to blame it on man."

And yet you have trouble articulating what that stupid stuff is. You just go straight to personal attacks.

And many whites used to support the KKK. As history has shown, after a while they will learn the fallacy of their ways.

When you have no argument, attack the messenger. The problem with you is that you're not even good at it. You can't even defend your personal attacks. If someone writes stupid crap on here, how about pointing out why it's stupid. Instead you want to talk about Trump's hair and mannerisms, or being fake Christians, or being racist. And everybody on here can see that. Well, almost everybody.

Yep, that's the narrative of the Liberal leadership. Your paraphrasing skills need a little work though.

Republicans don't want to help poor people is a good Liberal catch phrase. And negative stereotyping is almost exclusively the domain of Liberals. If you watched the DNC then this is painfully obvious.

Oops, wrong quote.

Republicans are racist is a good Liberal catch phrase. Republicans want dirty air and dirty water is a good Liberal catch phrase. Republicans hate gay people is a good Liberal catch phrase. We can go down this road all do long...well I can. And Congress has done too much already...to the tune of $20 trillion in debt. I wish we would pay them to stay home.

Spoken by the King of the Leash.

So are a bunch of other people. Too bad most identify as Liberal. And you will vote for an unconvicted felon as long as she promises free stuff. Now who is the embarrassment?

Such hateful remarks with no evidence. Sounds like you are guilty of the very thing you rail against. Pedophilia! Ring a bell?

Wow, way to keep up with the conversation. You are venturing into Big Girl territory. If you can't keep up or understand, maybe you shouldn't interject yourself into the conversation.

As I have asked numerous times, show me some proof of Trumps racists rants. Every time I have asked, no evidence has been shown. Why do I feel like no evidence will be shown again this time. Probably because you have been one of the targets of this request and you have yet to show any evidence. If you want to play this game, I can also. new tobie is a pedophile. Don't ask for evidence because I will just ignore you and move on to a different topic...but I will keep repeating the allegation until people start believing me. This is as easy as throwing out the race card. I think I will keep doing it.

Apparently you haven't read my posts over the pasts months. I fully admit Trump is not a conservative. I've been saying that every since he announced his candidacy. I'm in no way shape or form a Trump fan. And I've never been a Republican, so I have nothing to split from. Sounds like you either got a case of mistaken identity or you are just doing the usual Liberal profiling. Is there something you want to admit? I'm falling in line behind Trump because the alternative is just that bad. Trump has said nothing to make me like him more. Hillary's DNC speech led me to fall in line with Trump. And I will gladly cast my vote for Trump as a repudiation of Hillary and the Liberal agenda. This whole post has just been a repeat of what I've been saying for over a year now. Hopefully I won't have to repeat it, but then again, some people (new tobie) are still trying to call Trump a racist. So I'm not optimistic. Liberals are gonna believe what the leaders tell them to believe...facts be damned.

FIFY

Yep, that's the narrative out of the Democrat leadership. Too bad they can't back it up. But what's really sad, is that their constituents believe them.

Man, it's true, anything can be found on the internet. I saw an article yesterday that provided solid proof that Bigfoot has been found.

When you can't defend his policies, just throw out the old trusty race card. Too bad that card is getting played unjustifiably way too often and is losing it's luster. And when the white lady called for a moment of silence at the DNC for fallen police officers, she found herself on the receiving end of racial hate. Bernie Sanders had a rally shut down due to racial hate. So I don't Hillary will be completely immune, provided the unspeakable happens and she actually wins.

That is the number of people that voted for Obama in the 2012 election.