Englebert

Let's compare the number of black people that have hanged themselves versus the number of black people that have been hanged by cops in the last 50 years. I'm afraid the numbers will not support you theory.

When I first saw this, all I could think of is "Who is gonna be the first to be offended?" I think a lot of people, when watching this, were thinking; "Can I get offended by this?" I have a feeling somebody somewhere is fuming...they don't know why they are offended, but they are.

I think a lot of chiropractors might be pissed that you elevated Hillary to their status, but I see your point.

No, believe me, they are idiots. I blend right in with them.

We could put him up against George Soros.

I've been around drunk people with guns all of my life. I've been around them when they have gotten into fist fights. I've been around them when they have gotten into shouting arguments. Not one time has any drunk or sober person pointed a gun at another. Not one time has a person even went and got a gun. If you are around drunk people that are pulling guns on each other, you might want to find a new place to hang out. The argument that drunk idiots will pull guns on each other has never happened around me, and there's been thousands of opportunities for it to happen.

As defective as he is, the other choice is way worse.

The left considers a bunch of Tea Party people shouting as "descending into violent mayhem". When the left wing protesters actually attack people and destroy property, then that's just "Americans exercising the right to protest". The hypocrisy on the left is undeniable when it comes to protester violence and destruction.

That's the domain of the left. When Obama lands on your property he will just write an executive order giving him a free pass. He would then tax all of your properties and give your riches to his donators. I've seen a lot of this talk about Republicans leaders wanting to bend and break the rules to deny Trump the nomination. The fact is nothing has been done. It's seems to be all talk from some sore losers.

I know, just wanted to get a jab in at Obama. I wasn't on this board before Obama. In fact, I paid very little attention to politics before Obama. I think I started paying more attention in the last few years of GW. I remember being shocked at the vitriol directed at him by the left wing media.

Wow, you have some tunnel vision goggles then. You never heard about threats and actual acts of violence from the Tea Party. But the Wall Street Occupiers was a cess pool of filth. But the left wing media practically gave them a pass. Bush was attacked way way worse than Obama. There is no comparison. Obama practically gets a free ride from the left wing media, the same media that blamed Bush for everything. And if you don't hear the democratic radio stations complaining about Republicans then you have the volume on mute. Your version of the percentage of hate is the complete opposite of the truth. It's hard to tell if you're just joking around because I find hard to believe that anyone can see the political atmosphere in this country the way you seem to.

Obama definitely gave us plenty to complain about.

The west coast is highly liberal in most of the urban areas and conservative in most of the rural areas. The population of the urban areas outnumbers the population of the rural areas, but there is a dichotomy. Middle America also has the same type of dichotomy with urban areas being liberal and rural areas being conservative. The east coast is highly liberal in the urban areas, but a lot of the rural areas are also liberal with pockets of conservatives. That's why I posed both questions in the same thread. If you try to look at just rural vs urban in the west coast or middle, any drawn conclusions fail measurably when applied to the east coast. And vice versa. Another thing, these differences have not remained stable over time. Some cities that were at one time highly conservative and experienced population growth changed to liberal in short order. Some cities did not. Most cities that were liberal and experienced population decline however did not change to conservative. Some rural areas have flip-flopped with little or no population growth. I have a feeling that both the Democrat and Republican parties have spent a lot of money studying this. I also have a feeling that neither has come up with any significant findings.

Hannity and O'Reilly have not been caught or even accused of doctoring tape or flat out lying to the American people. I know the left-wing media sweeps the antics of above mentioned under the rug, but even you has to know that they have purposely lied to American people. You accused Hannity and O'Reilly of making racists remarks on an earlier thread, and I challenged you to provide proof. Proof was never provided. I now challenge you to provide proof where Hannity or O'Reilly has doctored tape or purposely lied to the American public like the other three have done.

Why is liberalism concentrated mostly in populated urban areas and conservatism is mostly concentrated in less populated rural areas? In a separate question, why is liberalism concentrated mostly on the east and west coasts, while conservatism is concentrated mostly in middle America? I have no idea. Well, I have a few unexplored theories. I've read some theories back in college, but none would hold water. Same goes for the few I read recently. I'm just curious as to what theories anybody has.

I have a question. Why do we let terrorists vote? I've been hearing since the Orlando shooting a bunch of the anti-gun nutcases asking "Why do we give terrorists guns?" So if a person is defined as a terrorist, I want to know why we still allow them to vote. I also have been hearing from a bunch of anti-gun elitists saying that we need to ban guns while being surrounded by security. Well my gun is my bodyguard. I can't afford to surround myself will full-time human bodyguards. I want to know why these elitists think they should take my bodyguard but keep theirs. Sorry for the rant, but these anti-gun fruitbags need a good pistol whipping.

Careful Nash, you can ask her a direct question pertinent to the topic and she will refuse to answer then accuse you of "deflection".

If you would have posted it I would have commented. I refuse to get into a childish "debate" with Big Girl. And if these are the best the left has got, y'all don't have much. Trump didn't look into the eyes of grieving parents that had just lost their son in Benghazi and tell them a outright lie. Edit: Sorry Bluedove. I initially read your comment wrong when I responded. I erroneously thought you meant you were waiting for someone to comment. .

We can definitely agree on that. And OU sucks.

I don't know if a one-liner about Trump "slays the Trumpster Fire". It was funny though. Now if she starts on Hillary she can have a whole TV series.

I hear this rationale all the time. I always ask for a example of this happening. I never get an answer.

I wanted a discussion on at least a 6th grade education level but she can't even rise to 3rd grade level.

Obama holds her political aspirations in the palm of his hand. All he has to do is say the word and Hillary is done...and she knows it.

Hillary's camp is the originator of the Birther movement.

Agreed.