Englebert

Again, the kindergartener calling his teacher dumb. Will it ever cease to be hilarious? You "bothered" because you are arrogant. It's hilarious because you are not all that bright.

The kindergartener calling his teacher dumb. You are consistent with your childish remarks. Your replies will probably get better once you reach intellectual adolescence.

You should read the stolen election topic. I haven't read it yet but I'm quite certain you can learn something from it. You got called out on your stupidity and all you can muster for a retort is something even a child would be embarrassed of making. You are "special". Way to ruin your own topic.

We already voted for a successful business man, and his performance was outstanding. But you and the nutcase Liberals threw a childish temper tantrum. Logic tells us that you and Liberals can't handle success, and are hell bent on keeping career political imbeciles in power. And you have the nerve to poste this crap blaming us instead of the real culprit...you. I'm guessing this is just your furthering attempts at comedy. I can't see how anyone with at least three functioning brain cells could actually consider this a serious post.

Consider yourself all of the weird old men. Your arrogance is just hilarious...and frightening. It's hard to believe that a "friend" hasn't explained to you yet as to why we all laugh at you.

That is a conundrum...although the rape part of the equation shouldn't be factored in. In any situation in which the mother and/or baby is in jeopardy, the decision should be made between the mother and doctor (and possibly the father, her family, the father's family...scenarios will differ). There are too many scenarios to list out in a written law. Morality should rule the decision, but morality is inheritably indefinable. A case-by-case decision is the best we can hope for. I started to bring up the situation in which the mother and/or child's life was in danger, but I hate this topic with a passion and decided to drop it. I think I will now partake in a drink or two.

I really don't have a side either. If you think that human life begins at conception, then any abortion is murder. If you think that human life begins at birth, then any pre-birth abortion would be acceptable. I don't see how anyone can factor rape into the equation. It is either murder or not.

We definitely know who is "full of it". "It be you", and everyone knows it. The pro-life crowd, along with many others, agree that sex education is the domain of the parents, not the school. Only Liberal nutcases think they own your children. The pro-life crowd, along with many, many others, agree that abortion procedures or abortion pills should not be a form of birth control. Once conception has been achieved, abortion should be outlawed. I don't know anyone that is against contraceptives pre-conception, and I don't know of anyone or any group trying to make it hard to get these. The pro-life crowd, along with many, many, many others, agree that Planned Parenthood sites are for abortions and should be shut down. If you believe life begins at conception, why would you want Planned Parenthood sites operational. I must assume this concept is too complex for you to comprehend. The pro-life crowd, along with many, many, many, many others, agree that SNAP (food stamps program) is corrupt and rife with fraudulent and/or ineligible recipients. The program should be overhauled. Only Liberal nutcases believe the worn-out false stereotype that non-Liberals want to eliminate food stamps for those who really need them. Looks like you outed yourself. Well, not really, we already knew. Only Liberal nutcases think fellow Libs should be free to live life with zero accountability for their actions. Everyone else should support and pay for their mistakes. I guess you are one of those fanatics. But of course, we already knew that. Maybe we should apply your philosophy to other situations. Let's say I get drunk, drive my car, get in a wreck, and seriously injure another person. Instead of society having to pay for that persons future medical needs, I can just finish him off. Problem solved. Let's say I get drunk, make a stupid wager and lose, and owe a guy a lot of money. I guess I can just abort him. Problem solved. Let's say I get drunk, meet a girl, and marry her. After sobriety kicks in, I realize that was a mistake. I guess I can just abort her. Problem solved. What other examples can we detail using your philosophy of life in which consequences of life choices can be resolved with termination?

Are you suggesting that the Right orchestrated this? The leaked opinion from a Supreme Court Justice was a "move" by the Right? Any proof and motivational rationale? Are you suggesting that the Supreme Court should not render decisions that will likely upset one political party, or the other, or both in an election year? Are you suggesting the majority of moderate voters are pro-choice versus pro-life? Any evidence to support that? I have no idea on this. I have never heard anything suggesting one way or the other.

Why do you think property taxes are so high? Is it because we have to pay for _____________ (fill in the blank). Take as much space and time as you need to articulate your position of anger. Please expound on your use of "hillbilly school districts" when spewing your vitriol. Name some of those schools you think are syphoning too much money so we can compare with the "non-hillbilly schools".

Nailed it!

Should we consider this post "words of wisdom" or should we refer to it as just another typical TDS post? We have come to expect nothing more. Trump is back, and the entertainment on this board is back. Keep'em coming "dude".

How much did Putin pay you to post this? I would ask you to explain why you think Truth Social is a scam, but I've dealt with you before...and everyone can agree that would be a hopeless endeavor. I'm guessing your just mad because you lost out on your lifetime membership with CNN+. If spouting off like this makes you feel better, be my guest. It doesn't mean we won't laugh at you though.

By looking at your posts, I'm guessing you are an expert at getting scammed. For some reason the old adage of "take advice from the experts" seems like "disinformation" in this instance.

Vote Trump and get America back on track...and as a bonus maybe he will lock her up. Or take InMagaWeTrust's advice and vote for an incompetent fool hell bent on destroying America. No conundrum to be found. InMagaWeTrus strikes again with the worn out comedy routine.

Blind and unintelligent responses is all you can muster. Remember, everyone on this forum is looking at your childish retort. How are you not embarrassed with yourself. Please explain. How can you continually post these ridiculously embarrassing "comebacks" and still maintain some semblance of self-esteem. Amazing. Please tell us how you do it. Way to derail another topic.

Who is paying you to act ignorant? A quick review of your posts would undoubtedly lead one to believe that compensation can only be the incentive for so much personal embarrassment. Is the pay sufficient for acting a fool?

Does a jerk from the other side elicit the same reaction from you? Do those jerks hurt their party in the same why? (Rhetorical). Why not? Is it because of Trump's actions or does the media sway the temperature in favor of one party? Does the media refer to these people as "jerks" or "patriots"? Do the jerks you refer to have impunity or need to walk on eggshells based on which side of the political isle they hail from? (Again, rhetorical.) Will you blame a political loss on the "jerk"? (Again, rhetorical.) Have fun fuming at and chastising the new "jerk" while ignoring the other jerks.

Agreed. And there are more than a handful of Liberals that need to keep their traps shut, but the media will run cover for them. So the Liberals get to scream nonsense as loud as they like while Republicans have to walk on eggshells to prevent even the slightest hint of "crazy" (as judged by a Liberal) from being disseminated throughout. Hell, the Conservatives don't even have to act out of line before being accused of it.

I started to let this go, but on further thought, you deserve to be embarrassed again. You are stating that we should vote (or not vote) for a person because he is from New York City or Hollywood. Only extremely weak-minded people vote for stereotypes instead of the person...and this is exactly what you advocate. Like simpletons, you are obsessed with stereotypes. Not every southerner is a good person, not every Yankee or Californian is bad. Everyone from well-below average intelligence to extremely intelligent people know this. Hopefully one day you will ascend into this group, but it appears you have a ways to go before cracking into the bottom quadrant.

Wow, you try harder that anybody I know to throw out insults that are just lame...even for adolescents. What's even more hilarious is that you think your mindless drivel based on zero evidence is thought-provoking. You are funny. Keep'em coming.

Coming from you, that is a compliment. But how can I be "one" of the dumbest posters and yet also have nobody else close to me. If nobody is close to me, wouldn't that make the dumbest poster? Do you ever read your own posts? If so, can even you make sense of them? How far down on the intelligence scale does one have to be before attaining the ability to comprehend your posts? Your comical posts couple with your unintelligible responses are our entertainment...FREE. Keep'em coming. Although your analysis of anything pertaining to Trump is hilarious, please keep trying with your personal insults...those are comedic gold. It's hard to imagine someone with so little self-awareness. Way to ruin another topic!

I forgot to include in my previous post the ultimate hilarity in InMagaWeTrust's post. As childish as the whole post is, the part that puts the cherry on top is Item number 3. InMagaWeTrust states that all politicians are corrupt. If true, what happens when American elects a non-politician to office. Oh wow, we have a case study. Who does he complain the loudest about being corrupt (yes, even you InMagaWeTrust can get this one correct)...the non-politician. So if all politicians are corrupt, and we elect a non-politician...who (in his eyes) is even more corrupt, who do we vote for? Should we vote for a corrupt politician or a corrupt non-politician. To avoid corruption, deductive reasoning concludes that InMagaWeTrust thinks we should vote for...well, I don't know. InMagaWeTrust, who should we vote for to eliminate political corruption...a politician, a Hollywood elite, a commoner? Please guide us in our next selection. I have a feeling that by the time the next GOP president takes office, TDS disease will fade into oblivion and a new Liberal disease will take it's place.

The real truth: InMagaWeTrust has proven on far too many occasions that he suffers from extreme TDS and has no objectivity...and has established a less trustworthiness rating than pretty much anything in existence. Everyone knows his opinions are trash. (Sorry dude...you can't complain after all of the lies and disinformation you have perpetuated.) I have thought about the last sentence in his post...like a child...and as every child can comprehend...many people play both sides. The laughable part is that the sentence is on a childlike level, but the poster is under the impression that it is thought provoking. That is hilarious. Think about it InMagaWeTrust. When it comes to Trump posts, you embarrass yourself more than CardinalBacker. That is a feat worthy of...well...pure, unadulterated embarrassment. I'll give you a trophy for persistence. You try harder than anyone to show your TDS affliction. Sorry Cardinalbacker, I thought you took the lead until InMagaWeTrust felt the need to grace us with the return of his comical rhetoric. BigGirl fell to a very, very distant third place.

I guess you see what you want to see. Ignore the most obvious explanations and go for the most vitriolic stance regardless of proof. When it comes to Trump, this is expected of you. How you can't see the way your hatred is blinding you is baffling. You would make a very good disseminator of fake news...i.e. liberal news "reporter" or CNN personality. I'm guessing your next post about that picture will be that Trump lost the election because millions of moderates saw that photo, concluded (like you) that Trump supporters are Nazis, so voted for a geriatric known liar. Yep, Trump's fault. Blind hatred is not a good look for you. In fact, if you want to see how bad your posts are...read InMagaWeTrust's posts. Your posts are just as bad. Maybe that dose of reality will wake you up. Embarrassed straight.