Englebert

I agree with pretty much all of this. But what is really stranger than the people that worship Trump, is the people that despise Trump. According to the election results, the people that hate Trump far outnumber the people who love him. So why do the worshippers get all the negative publicity, but the haters get a pass? (Rhetorical question...we know why.)

Wow, are you actually trying to use an off-handed remark meant for amusement as some sort of evidence to justify your contempt for Trump. I guess that is the result of blind hatred...and a lot of hatred exists. Far more hatred than love.

Please explain your TDS driven analysis on how anyone was "tricked". Now this should be comical.

Is "blind loyalty" akin to "blind hatred"? Which is worse? Which side has a majority of the afflicted? It's sometimes fun (and simplistic) to put people in a box with a label when one doesn't understand their reasoning processes. But blind loyaty and blind hatred both lead to deranged analysis, and both can lead to very bad outcomes...a la Biden. Who won the election with a record number of votes?

Since we are playing armchair psychologist, do you think the people that envy Trump to the point of hatred outnumber those who worship him? Which group voted for Biden? Is admiring someone because of their success just as good as hating someone because of their success? (Yes, that is the correct order for this statement.)

Wow. And you just dismiss the over 90% non-stop negative (and very hateful) media coverage of Trump. Yeah, let's blame Trump's loss on some mean tweets. Let's not talk about the behavior of the lefties. Who mobilized who?

I don't know who the next Republican presidential nominee will be, but we already know a few things about him/her. The nominee will be racist (even if he is Black), will be misogynistic (even if she's a woman), will be xenophobic, will hate immigrants, will hate gay/transgender people, and will hate anyone that fits into a minority category. These are undeniable certainties. I hope the next nominee gets banned from social media in order to protect those who levy these accusations. We don't want the next candidate to be labeled a bully. That will surely turn off the "moderates" and doom the candidacy.

How in the world do you equate "both parties working against Trump" with "the swamp was smarter than Trump"? Those are nowhere close to the same sentiment. I guess it would take a "genius" to decipher that twisted logic...if it is even possible. And it's ironic that you resorted to sarcastic name-calling when your attempts at degradation hold more truth than you can imagine. Not that I'm a genius...it's just that for some, normal people can seem like geniuses. You are welcome!

How about this: Trump tried to drain the swamp, but was being stifled by both parties. You forget the fourth, and most obvious choice. Somehow even you (LOL) didn't know what the most obvious choice was...obviously.

HF 41 Splendora 21 Final

HF 41 Splendora 21 4:11 4th

HF 33 Splendora 21 4:25 4th

HF 33 Splendora 14 6:51 4th

HF 27 Splendora 14 End of 3rd

HF 27 Splendora 14 7:15 3rd

HF 19 Splendora 14 Halftime

Just following your lead. Quit hijacking threads with your personal and assanine comments.

Really? Can the same contention be more poignant when describing you? Will you ever know...doubtful, but we know. Now for the real debate...did you derail the topic or did I? Again, we know. Who will you blame? We know.

Please backup your "anti-vax" claim. A really, really, stupid person is incapable of distinguishing between those who advise people to not get the vaccine versus those who believe in personal choice. Only that type of person could somehow draw that incomprehensible conclusion. Are you a member of that box? You know, boxes that you always try to put people in. Do you fit in a box? It seems you do. Or you could explain yourself, i.e. fight your way out of that paper bag...I mean box. I don't think you can. Prove me wrong.

Do you think TVC is more worried about him getting called names, or others correctly labelling you? Between the two, who would you consider a moderate...one that endures ridicule for their moderate stances? Do you want a hint? It's not TVC. Ooops, I gave away the answer without a spoiler alert. Aw man, I derailed the topic. Wait...no, that was you. Who will you blame? Spoiler alert. LOL.

I still find it extremely baffling that you persist on the narcissistic attitude. Can we debate on whether the fan is superior to the player? Is the student more competent than the teacher? So to be clear, I've always known that political parties don't care about me. Am I "halfway there"? Can I attain, either by intelligence or contrition, your way of thinking? To answer this question and defend your position, you will have to justify that position by presenting pass statements by BS Wildcats that led you to proclaim his inferiority, i.e. "halfway there". In congruence, I get to bring up your past posts. Would you like to apologize to BS Wildcats for your braindead insinuation that you are superior, or would we like to move this issue to a new topic for discussion of your intellect...just so this topic can proceed without derailment? Are you and BS Wildcats BFFs and you were just injecting a good-nature ribbing? Please elaborate. Your call. Please, please don't make that a rhetorical statement, even though those who proclaim to be moderates while espousing nothing but far, far Lefty liberal policies are laughing at the plausibility that somehow this statement was not rhetorical. I look forward to creating a new topic to discuss the viability of you wielding that self-proclaimed intellectual superiority of "halfway there". LOL. This topic can proceed...InBidenWeTrust will make the call on the new topic. Do we "believe" in him?

Are you serious? Really? A simple internet search will give you all of the Liberal talking points you feed on, showing their defiance to the commission. I actually applaud every state that refused to hand over personal information. But this also doomed the commission. So be it. Voter fraud exists. To what scale...nobody knows. It's hard for me to fathom that you had no idea that most states refused to cooperate. Even the most ill-informed of the politically blind knew this information. I'm guessing your "peanut brain" verses "big brain" comment is ringing loud and hollow about now. Since a simple internet search is either too hard or beyond the scope of your capabilities (either is plausible), here's the results of the first few links when I wasted 3 seconds of my life to revisit a common topic. I'm guessing you will attack the source now...but then again. [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] Have fun.

Why did you "forget" to mention that the commission was disbanded due to many states not cooperating, not providing critical data to the mission, and threatening lawsuits? Sounds like you are just regurgitating CNN, MSNBC, etc. talking points. And you call yourself a moderate.

The evidence that smashing, destroying items is therapeutical is an overwhelmingly "no". Rage is one of the least likely determinants of depression leading to suicide. Most suicidal people are not looking for revenge or driven by rage. There is zero evidence that allowing suicidal people to vent their frustrations will alleviate the psychosis. Simplifying the dynamics of causation of suicide to simple "rage" in need of release has no scientific support. Since I don't possess the master level of persuasion, I apologize for resorting to repetition to make my point.

True, but not what Biden was conveying. I should have quoted Biden's remarks so everyone knew it was a dig directly squared straight at him, using his own words to hang himself.