Englebert

Well Joe was vice-pres when Obama was ranting for eight years about how his failures were due to Bush. Biden is just following the precedent set forth by the first clean, articulate, Black President.

As stated above, you can't comprehend it, so why try. You are a typical Liberal...accuse others of what you are guilty. There is only one person "triggered". Guess who that would be. Do you actually think your immature deflections are helping you "save face" for running from one of your own statements? I'll keep reminding you, no doubt you will keep that tail tucked between your legs as you scurry off in shame. Find a third grader to explain this post to you.

Just calling you out. You are 0 for 2 in just two posts on this thread. Apparently you have an unlimited amount of strikes towards embarrassing yourself. Since you have so much time on your hands, instead of attempting to delve into the psyche of people undoubtedly much smarter and superior than you, why don't you revisit the other post in which you tried to lie about Trump's withdrawal plan. Yep, you ran like a frightened schoolgirl when called out to explain your position. But here you are, going through your laughable comedy skit of calling your kindergarten teacher stupid. Do you ever get tired of being laughed at? Seriously. How much embarrassment can one person endure? We might want to think about calling the good people at Guinness. How in your limited intellectual skill set do you perceive me as being triggered? Does laughing at you correlate to being triggered in your little fantasy world? We all know what will happen next. You will run from the questions, only to reappear with another topic only a child could think is evidence of a Conservative "gotcha". And like a child, you seem to forget things awfully fast...like painful embarrassment. Kudos on the ability to endure unlimited amounts of shame (although that is probably not a positive quality).

I didn't think it was possible, but your attempts to stereotype people have gotten worse. Lets see if I can duplicate your thought process: Trump cures cancer, InMagaWeTrust is going to be outraged. Did I capture the reprehensible way that you express your completely false narratives about others?

Don't forget making us dependent on foreign countries for our oil supplies.

LCM 13 HF 0 Halftime

Game stopped for weather delay.

Did the cat get your tongue? You've ran your mouth plenty on here, calling everyone stupid childish names, but you run like a frightened schoolgirl when challenged to explain your post. Why is this? Is this characteristic of someone possessing superior intellect than other board members? You act like Biden...refuse to answer questions by running off the stage. It seems to be a pattern both of you rely on. How funny will it look when you spout off on another topic, calling everyone "stupid", when you have this post hanging over your head. And there are plenty of other posts in which when challenged, you ran away. Since this is your standard way of operating, should we challenge you to explain your next post (in which you will run)? Or should we resort to name calling (in which you are incompetent and in Biden fashion, try to deflect blame on someone else for ruining the topic)? Or should we ignore you and let you talk to yourself. The third option seems to be the best...but that's no fun. I'll choose the first, then dive down into the gutter when you choose the second. What do you think? Am I right? So...do you wish to explain your position on the Trump Taliban treaty? The questions I previously asked are quoted so you won't have to scroll back up. Here's your second chance to save face (I laughed at myself while typing that). I'm guessing you will respond with the second option. Since this response contains more than two sentences, will you continue to try the "I didn't read your post" defense? Let's see.

Tell us ol' childish wise one, what was contained in that agreement? What parts were good and what parts were bad? Please outline your stance. I would love to get a perspective of how a simpleton interprets that agreement.

InMagaTrust logic: call everyone dumb then whine when someone responds in kind. Do you think anyone takes you serious when you post? Why do you waste everyone's time with useless and irrelevant posts? You are genuinely childish.

So...you call people names then cry when you get called names. What silly little moniker should we apply to people like that?

Reasonable? You deride everyone on the board then try to claim victimhood. Your posts decry your chidishness. Any topic you join immediately becomes worthless, and in cute but predictable fashion, you place blame on others. You tell a whopper, I call you out, you try to blame me. How do live with yourself? You've also claimed on multiple occasions that you don't read my posts. But here you are, responding. Another lie? Who cares. It's apparently ingrained in you. Keep'em coming. Cheap entertainment for the board.

You are the one that claimed you are being called names because of your political positions. Everyone knows that is a lie. I am just the one that called you out on it...and you are crying like a little baby. Can you hear the laughter. It is thundering all around you.

Pretty shameful on your part. Keep whining like a little baby. I and everone else will keep laughing at you and your disingenuous remarks. You are definitely the joke of the forum.

The question is, in your opinion, which issue reigns supreme for which the so-called "experts" have lied the most, or more succinctly have falsely led one to believe that their conclusions are based on science. Man Made Global Warming (Climate Change) versus Covid 19 (current pandemic). In both cases, the ultimate goal is noble. In both cases, the experts/pundits/know-it-alls have consistently lied, misled, and provided a plethora of misinformation. In both cases, other causation/remedies/remedial actions have been banned/censored. Which issue has been most influential in lowering your trust in science? If your trust in scientific "experts" has increased with either issue, please don't be shy from admitting that also. (You might want to be prepared for ridicule though). If you have another issue that can compete with these two issues, feel free to list that also.

You insult everyone on the board, I call you out, and you think I have a problem? You are a very, very special little boy...intellectually that is. I'm laughing at you. Were you praying for the posters on the board when you attributed your baseless stereotypes to them in an insulting and demeaning way? You are not praying for anyone. It's your obnoxious way of trying to relay a superiority attitude. It's obvious to everyone on this board of your intentions every time you post. Praying for you. Yeah right. You are very foolish and a hypocrite of the highest order. Own it. You deserve it. But I'm sure you will continue to cry about how others don't like you, and call you names. This is confusing to you because you are such a good person deserving of favor. Your unfounded superiority attitude coupled with your victimization attitude is pure comedic gold. Keep the entertainment coming.

Reality is very, very foreign to you. Are you really suggesting you get called names because of your positions on issues? You can't possibly be this dumb...can you? Practically every one of your posts contains an emphatic derision of fellow posters, but somehow your mental gymnastics lead to believe the derision given back is based on your policy positions. You are really something special...and not in the good way. I'm sure you will spin this in your own little mind to be a compliment. You are entertaining...but in a useless way.

Congratulations. You are now officially the stupidest poster on the board. Big Girl must feel like Jimmy Carter about now.

Deblasio has stated that you need a "Proof of Vax" card and an ID for indoor activities: dining, exercising, entertainment, etc. Will this law apply to voting places? I'm guessing he will suggest that voting locations are immune to Covid.

I have driven to Ratliff stadium in Odessa 3 times. I have a friend that lives in San Angelo. Each trip I have driven to her house on Thursday, spent the night, then drove to Odessa the next morning. Attended the game on Friday night, then drove back to San Angelo. Spent the night, then drove back to my house on Saturday. Each trip was for the explicit purpose of watching Odessa Permian. Does it count if you spread the trip out over a few days? I've also driven to Lubbock twice. The purpose was to watch a Texas Tech game, but took in a Wollforth Frenship game once, and a Shallowater game on the other trip. The explicit purpose for the trips was the Texas Tech games, but purposely got there on Friday, early enough to attend the High School games. Does this count?

Now that the Liberals have broken the seal on "proof of membership" papers (New York, and others to follow, mandating through law that people show their vaccination status), what else can we apply this to? The obvious is voter ID. But maybe we can take this further. Can we pass a law, in the same vein as New York's law, in which you must show your citizenship papers to partake in American life? Should we mandate that all restaurants require citizenship papers to enter their premises? Should all grocery stores be required to check proof of citizenship to enter? Should all gas stations require proof of citizenship before filling up? Hospitals? Schools? Should we mandate all city buses require citizenship papers to board? Should all non-citizens be allowed to board but be required to sit in the back of the bus? We all know that Liberals will advocate the necessity of "papers" to save lives. But will they decry the same mentality when the same rationale is reversed? I would love for the Five Man Electrical Band members to respond. Are these band members (I don't know how many are still alive) opposed to the law-mandated "SIGNS" that must be posted on businesses requiring "proof of papers"? If unopposed, will they support other signs requiring "proof of papers"? (Of course, them being Canadian, I think I used a bad example.)

The same reason Trump is not in prison for Russian collusion...aka...treason. Your question was answered immediately after you posted this topic. I don't know whether to laugh at your lack of compression or feel sorry for you. A conundrum for sure. Since your question has been answered, let's contemplate the main purveyors of conspiracy theories in the realm of political relevance. How many people do you think have espoused the idea that Trump would be reinstated on your date versus how many people think Trump was guilty of Russian collusion. It is a question of numbers. Would you like to gander on that? Your whole reason for starting this topic was to ridicule Trump supporters, but when statistical analysis (i.e. common sense) is applied, it is evident that Liberals are the people that should be ridiculed for imbecilic wild theories. How are you not ashamed of yourself? Which party espouses the idea that Black people are too stupid to obtain an ID? More posts like this and you will drop down to Inmagatrust territory. You are already on the edge. The only thing saving you from the cliff is your refrain from personal insults and hilarious but undeserved grandiose attitude.

I thought Trump was in prison due to collusion with Russia, failure to pay his taxes, profiting from the office of the President, creating and enforcing dictatorial policies, treason, aiding and abetting the enemy, war crimes, etc., etc., etc. What happened? I thought Bush and Trump were sharing a prison cell once occupied by Reagan. Do you actually believe the Conservatives/Trump supporters can come anywhere close to the conspiracy theory nutjobs in the Liberal/Anti-Trump party? But if you want to laugh, go ahead. You just reveal your true bias by ignoring the overwhelming superiority of your own party at this game.

How so? Let's put your analytical skills to the test. Show us your self-described intellectual superiority by describing how he "is in the wrong thread". Your verbal skills tell us all we need to know about your intellectual skills. Can we debate on who really is the one in the wrong thread? We all know the identity of that poster. You can run, but...uh, uh, uh, you know guys, I mean...you know the rest. Come on man!

Says the kindergartener to his teacher. The laughter (at you, not with you) continues.