Englebert

The auto insurance companies are spending unfathomable amounts of money on commercials to reign supreme in the business. State Farm, Farmers, Geico, Progressive, Liberty, etc. spend tons on advertisement. Some commercials are initially funny, many are just downright pathetic. Some adopt a logical, results driven strategy. Some adopt a Sesame Street puppet show strategy. Some implore catchy slogans of persuasion. Practically all claim that their company can save you a fortune. Can anyone tell me the difference between the companies as far as results? Who is the fairest at resolving claims? Who is the fastest? Who is the cheapest? Who is the most politically correct in resolving these claims? (But that is not the subject of this topic.) If 92% of the media picked out a company to disparage, how long would that company last? If practically every mainstream media outlet, every late show comedian, every daytime talk show host came out to denigrate State Farm, how would they fair? If these groups ignored, and even lied about State Farm's payout amount rate, rejection rate, and even criticized every aspect of their policies...while simultaneously ignoring the same aspects of all of the other companies, how long would State Farm last? Does it even remotely matter how good/bad State Farm's performance data is? Would it even matter one iota if an outside entity (Russia, Russia, Russia) spent a couple of thousand dollars in a campaign to influence State Farm's image? What if social media (Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, etc...repeat...etc.) conspired to ban all positive information about State Farm, but encouraged negative (and mostly false) information about State Farm. What if these companies conspired to disallow any truth about State Farm, and even ban any new startup companies from existing because of their perceived sympathy for State Farm? Would you still go with the talking lizard?

Don't forget cow farts.

I agree with your posts. But I will disagree with your opinion that Trump's "talking too much" made the moderate swing voters hate him. The media's 92% negative coverage (not to mention ignored accomplishments) (also not to mention social media's ban on anything negative towards Biden) made swing voters hate him. George Bush faced almost the same thing. Liberals hated the man. Same with Reagan. Liberals hated the man. Same with Romney and McCain. It will be exactly the same with the next GOP president/candidate. The liberal media will guide Liberals to hate him/her, no matter what that person does or says. I like that Trump fought back. I'm hoping the next GOP president fights back even harder against the biased (self-proclaimed) elitists who dictate what the Liberals think. If we had an unbiased media I have no doubt Trump would have won in an overwhelming landslide. I'm thinking at least 47 to 48 state win. And if you use Obama's geography, probably 54 to 55 state win.

I know of a person that was sane, analytical, thoughtful, unbiased but now honestly believes that Trump almost single-handedly ruined the United States of America. This guy thought that feelings, as preached by the media, was the true soul of America...be damned rule of law. Yes, hurt feelings would be the downfall of the greatest country this Earth has ever seen. He is willing to overlook every accomplishment by the Trump/Admin team, and almost unforgivably recognizes only personal "failures" mirroring that of the persona of satan himself...as told to him by his new god...the liberal medial. And there's a lot more like him. This is so easy. How can anyone take someone serious that can't back up their claims. Care to continue belittling people you know little about? Let's analyze you instead. Do you think you will come out looking any better than the little old lady you described?

You once again show your lack of any semblance of intelligence or analytical skills. You post just to attack. And you had the nerve to try to blame non-Liberals for running off past posters. Apparently you own no mirrors.

Too bad we have people like you that, while not too bright, constantly tries to denigrate people. Every post contains attacks on groups of people you know nothing about, and displayed with a superiority complex that can only be described as legendary disillusion. Maybe we can setup a swap program with other countries. We will take whoever we can get in an even swap for you. Citizenship for citizenship. Anyone that reads your childish posts can agree on that plan.

That is the same sentiment I feel every time I see one of your posts.

Yes it is just plain stupid that you can be so gullible. Again, scour the research and produce a single paper that definitively links Man to rise in temperature. Re-scour the research and find a single paper that shows empirical proof that this rise in temperature is detrimental to Earth's health. Theories, projections, educated guesses do not cut the mustard, except for people like you. You apparently are too lazy to do your own research...and these people rely on that fact. It seems to me, and I could be wrong, that you think people like me deny Climate Change exists. That is not the case. My position is...PROVE it does. I will not blindly follow someone who can't back up their theories. And what is worse, I get to be called a "science denier" for demanding that these people adhere to scientific methodology. So yeah, you are right...this is just plain stupid. And deniers like you are the main culprit for lacking methodology. Congratulations. You want to throw trillions of dollars and upset everyone's way of life based on a theory that has no scientific proof. Democrat leaders love people like you.

Ask your friend. I'm sure his elementary school is closed due to the weather.

You always blame someone else for your shortcomings. Shocking, no scratch that, expected. You embarrass yourself more and more with every post.

What happen to this thread? Did you finally realize how ridiculous it was? Or did "your friend" (ha ha...like that exists) tell you to knock off the childishness? How many of the posters you referenced are going to come running back to the forum now that your wisdom is once again gracing the board? Is your friend happy with you right about now? What post will you point out to your friend that illustrates your incredible wisdom? Will your friend agree that you are the second coming full of love and grace, and all of the other posters just run people off? How about getting your friend signed up. I'm sure his wisdom will be infinitely more beneficial than your offerings. If your friend is not old enough to read and write, well...it can't get worse.

So now you go down to 3rd grade level. How much embarrassment can one man take before he gets banned? And you tried earlier to claim other's left the board because the posts on this board are offensive to their intelligence, but they would rather be inundated with your type of posts. You definitely bring comedy to the board...or sadness. After all, it's not really funny laughing at someone with your capabilities.

You'll just have to wait for maturity to set in before you can understand it. Or maybe you can ask Hillary about losing. Of course her situation is totally different. Trump lost to someone who is verifiably inferior. Hillary lost to someone in which she was the inferior...but claims to be superior. Did she blame the media? The media that was 90% on her side. Was it "hook, line, and sinker" when she proclaimed that statement? And just to be clear, what leads you to make the statement "Trump got outplayed by Sleepy Joe"? Is hiding in the basement so you don't show your true colors convert to as "outplaying" someone in your head? Are you proud of your assessment?

When you have 90% of the media espousing 95% negative coverage, frankly it is shocking that Trump got as many votes as he did. Even someone at your intelligence level could have won. Hiding Joe in the basement was the best thing his campaign did. Not hard to figure out. That type of critical thinking is at more of a freshman or sophomore level, so you might realize it in another 5 or 6 years of schooling (including summer school).

Can you explain yourself? I haven't dropped down to your 6th grade mentality yet, so I'm currently having trouble deciphering that drivel. That state is not natural for most of us.

After that disastrous Hope and Change thing, the swamp was just too full. No hope. Trump accomplished some of the draining, but now the Hope and Change: Redux regime is filling it back up.

And what do you call your posts...miniature force? Impotent force? Incompetent force? Comedic force?

Crude sexual innuendos is the best you can do? You'll have to try very hard to get any more childish than that. I'm guessing you are embarrassed with yourself again, and are trying to get banned to save face in some weird way that only makes sense to you. This post is enough to do it, but I don't know how the moderators will react.

Well we definitely can't include any of the ones you start. Can you point to a post where I have said anything about a stolen election? You like to stereotype don't you. Is it because your intelligence level is so low that you can't differentiate between posters? Do you have difficulty deciphering details...and everything is just one big blob to you. Your posts provide the evidence...but yet you can still maintain that arrogance. I'll guess even PamFam is laughing at you.

Are you actually suggesting that the non-Liberals on this site ran them off? Are you actually saying that people like you have no part in those guys decision not to post? Do you have any evidence to back up your wild theory? I would be inclined to believe that your childish posts are probably a bigger factor than the "echo chamber". I'd be willing to bet that those who no longer post refrain for a variety of reasons. Leave it to you post conspiracies, then claim everyone else is a conspiracy theorist.

Let's say you were the defendant in a criminal case. The prosecutor brought in expert witnesses, one after another, that all claimed you were guilty of theft. Their consensus was clear, unanimous and precise that you were the culprit. Your lawyer then cross-examines them, and asks them to show the jury the evidence of why they concluded your guilt. They offer pictures, charts, graphs, papers, etc. that show the victim was missing some of his possessions, but they offer nothing that ties you to the crime. Your lawyer askes them if they considered any other factors that might show the culprit as someone else. They offer no response. Should the jury consider you guilty, or should the jury demand the prosecutor prove their case against you. I rest my case.

You can make this stuff up. NASA just did. Do you actually consider this scientific evidence? Really? Where in this "study" do they cancel out extraneous variables? Nowhere! That is a must in scientific methodology. These so called scientist should be ashamed of themselves for use of any form of the word science. But you fell for it like a good little sheeple. I'm guessing if these "scientists" saw a dead deer in the woods, their consensus conclusion would be that a man killed him. Never finding a bullet wound, never considering other sources...just yep, it was a man. And if you question their conclusion, you are a science denier. Did you see the part in the article that explained why Man is the culprit? Did you see the part in the article where these "scientists" ruled out extraneous variables like Sun spots, Sun hibernation, solar flares, variations of Earth's axis tilt, Moon's variable gravitation pull on Earth, volcano CO2 emissions, etc.? Yeah, me neither. Only a science denier can look at this as science. Please come up with something better than this dribble. Like actual science.

It took you that long to come up with this gem. How embarrassing for you. No wonder you avoid real topics.

I'd get burned by the lemon law though.

Considering your intellectual status, that is saying something. When you ascend to "peanut brain", I will consider contemplating the validity of one of your posts. No doubt that point is a very, very long way away. If you had a thousandth of the intellectual skill you think you have, why not jump into the Man Made Global Warming thread. PamFam is in dire need of some help. I like his contributions to this forum, but he is struggling mightily on that one. On second thought, you have shown you will only degrade that topic like every other one you participate in. Carry on with this one. Nobody cares.