Englebert

Your unwarranted arrogance is hard to imagine...especially when aspiring to "peanut brain" is an insurmountable task for you. (I purposely left this post short so you would not complain again about your inability to read it all. Comprehending it is another story.)

You are horrible at deflection. You can run, but you can't show evidence...evidence that you say has overwhelming support from the experts. SHOW US THE EVIDENCE. We all know why, but you won't admit it. Not a sign of a free thinker. I'm fairly certain the comedy exists at your expense.

So you still can't come up with a single shred of scientific evidence of Man as the leading cause of Climate Change, or even if the perceived change is detrimental. Not one shred. Wow. For something that has such overwhelming support from the best and brightest, this should be a very, very simple task. Is the issue just too complicated for someone like you, or is it that you actually tried to find the evidence but fell short? I'm guessing you didn't even try, but your "free thinking" mind will just continue to be controlled by your masters. If you were a Conservative, the Liberals would be screaming "whataboutism, whataboutism, whataboutism" at your latest offering. Although you say you are not a Liberal, the Liberals will treat you as one of their own and give you a pass. (I do find it hilarious that Liberals are guilty of so much hypocrisy that they had to event a new word to put a spin on it. Such hypocrites.)

Practically everyone that is here illegally would voluntarily leave, and we don't even need ICE or a wall. Instead of rounding up the illegal aliens, we need to start rounding up the employers of illegals. Start throwing them in jail and enforce massive fines...and consequently the practice of hiring cheap illegal labor will stop. Once an illegal can't provide food for himself and family, he will voluntarily leave.

You can't list a single scientist that can provide scientific evidence that Man is the leading cause of Man Made Global Warming, or Cooling, or Climate Change, or whatever it is now being called. You can't list a single scientist that can show evidence that Earth's perceived climate change will lead to Man's demise as the theory suggests. Show me the ACTUAL SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE. It's hilarious that you've claimed on multiple occasions on this forum that your are a free thinker, then expose yourself as a good little liberal sheeple.

When discussing illegal immigration, my focus is on the victims. I also don't believe in rewarding someone for breaking laws. In response to your points: a) they don't have to be, b) that is 8 years a legal citizen could be employed instead of the job filled by someone here illegally, c) the wages for menial jobs are artificially low because of illegal labor. And actually, many many illegals are performing jobs well beyond menial level. We have legal citizens currently working menial jobs, so Americans will do them. (Pay might have to be adjusted.) If not, we can expand/revamp/continue with our green card system, in which participants pay taxes. I am more than willing to have the green card system lead to citizenship. Now let's discuss the perpetrators of the crimes. I don't blame or hold ill will to anyone that jumped the border to come to the United States. I would probably do the same thing if faced with the same situation. But I should never be rewarded for it. The focus for this topic should fall square on two groups of people that have failed the American citizen: employers of illegals and politicians/leaders that let it happen. Each group should suffer the consequences of letting this situation exist. We should start perp walking both of these groups. As far as the millions already here, and the millions on the way...I choose to side with the victims...the American worker/taxpayer.

I read your post. Please explain why we need to "accept the science" which is in no way shape or form actual "science". What part of the theory of Man destroying Earth follows scientific methodology?

I feel sorry for the millions of legal citizens that had/have trouble finding a job, or had their wages depressed because business' decided to hire cheap illegal labor. I feel sorry for us, the American taxpayer, who have been footing the bill. Is this the behavior we want to reward? Is this the route we want to continue?

And we all know which side of the Man Made Global Warming theory is wearing the tin foil hat. Just in case it is not evident: It's the science deniers who claim a hypothesis is proven without showing proof, then accuses everyone that questions the hypothesis as being a science denier. Pretty convenient to stifle debate as a means to win a debate. Is that considered "science"?

What "science" are you accepting...the science of "sheepdom"? Please provide scientific evidence that Man is destroying Earth's climate. I bet you won't. I know you won't...because you can't. There is no scientific evidence. If you have it, show it...or be deemed a "science denier"! If the evidence is overwhelming, this should be a very, very simple task.

Mine's not rolling. Been out for 20 hours.

The first words after the headline in that article were "Climate deniers". I just had to laugh and click the little X in the top right corner. I'm willing to bet that the article claims that the "climate deniers" are the ones who want proof that Man is the cause for this unproven hypothesis that Earth's climate is about to destroy itself. The real "climate deniers", aka "science deniers" are the one's that claim this theory is proven...without providing one shred of proof, and best of all, without eliminating extraneous variables (which have far more evidence of causation than Man). It's all too typical for people like this author to accuse others of what he, himself is profoundly guilty of. How can anyone take an article seriously when the author tries (laughably) to denigrate his readers in the first words of the article? I'm guessing he might get an Emmy for this article though? Fake award for a fake article written by a fake author.

I totally agree with you...and thank you for bringing to the forefront the reality of data. I was using your post to take a stab at the anti-Trump hypocrites that walk among us.

Your posts get shot down every time you try, but yet you can still maintain that aura of superiority. If Guinness had a record for resiliency to self-inflicted embarrassment, you would own it.

Trump/Admin was unceremoniously mocked (and still are) for pointing out this same fact after his 2016 inauguration. It's funny that acknowledging the streaming audience is only logical when basing it on political ideology.

After Rapino and her U.S. Women's soccer teammates screamed about sexism...getting paid less than the men (while player lesser competition), do you think they are now worried about even having a job? After Biden signed the executive order demanding men get to compete against, rather, dominate women in college and high school sports, how long will it take for male soccer players, that cannot earn a spot on the U.S. Men's team, realize they can make $100,000.00 to $175,000.00 a year plus benefits playing on the Women's team? Will karma prevail?

Your TDS is worse than CardinalBacker...and that is saying something. Just to prove my point...and expose your extreme TDS, please articulate Trump's actions that lead you to believe he was a wannabe dictator. Let me remind you (like you have to remind a kindergartner) that we will compare and contrast your basis of analysis against others that did comparable (or even worse) actions. Please get those fingers to typing to try to save face on what is one of the most unintelligent posts in the history of SETxSports. I would love for you to explain your position. Since most comedians have resorted to bashing Trump, I'm in dire need of a good laugh. Your feeble attempt of redemption might be just the ticket to make me laugh again.

I like that Trump spouts off any thought that enters his head. We know exactly where he stands. I wish politicians would be more open about their stance on issues. You could interview Biden for 24 hours straight and still have no idea where he stands on issues. If he actually stated a position, that stance would probably change within the next 24 hours, depending on who and where the question was asked. I'll take Trump's rude, crude, unpolished stance on issues over Biden's smooth "whichever way the wind blows" stances. (I started laughing at myself when I wrote "smooth".)

Don't disagree with any of that. I'm just curious about the point you were reaching for when posting this. Do you think he was talking out of his arse? Do you attribute "talking out of their arse" when others change their tune? (Actually, I don't even know if he has changed his tune on this subject. He's changed parties numerous times in his life. I don't know what factors dictated the change.) If we want to start trying to embarrass people by playing old clips, many, many Democrat politicians (and many Republican) would have a lot of explaining to do to the politically correct crowd, much less their base.

He looks a lot younger there. Was Trump a registered Democrat when this was filmed? Did he state this when Obama, Hillary, Wild Bill, Biden, etc. all said that marriage was between a man and woman, or did their evolvement come much later? Was Trump spouting lies or did that penchant evolve much later? Can we trust anything that comes out of his mouth? Let's ask CardinalBacker...the definitive authority on all-Trump musings.

Why is it so hard for you to tell the truth? You lie constantly, and this is just another whopper.

Yep, you are the same obnoxious fool that is too childish to control his own emotions. Your mother must be proud of her little boy. Does she refer to you as Silly Willy as well?

Please refrain from tagging me unless you are ready to get banned again. You do know how easy that is don't you.

Your TDS is in full bloom. It's funny, and saddening that you try to judge others perception of reality while you are so blinded by hate. The more you talk about Trump, the more embarrassing you get. Nancy Pelosi sounds almost logical when compared to your TDS inspired rants.

Did Bush (both) beg for negative coverage? Did Reagan beg for negative coverage? Who doesn't understand?