Englebert

But you are not sane when it comes to Trump, so your TDS inspired analysis of others is garbage.

Now that was some delusional reality laid out right there. If Bernie had 99% non-stop negative coverage, he wouldn't be able to muster a 5% favorability rating. Same with most people of no substance. It's funny that you try to denigrate other's posts on here after some of the whoopers you've laid out regarding Trump.

I once thought you were fairly intelligent. I can admit when I make a mistake. Just think, the buffoon EnlightenedOne/MagaWeTrust/WhateverHeCallsHimselfNow and Big Girl are both compadres of you, applauding your rants. That should be an eye opener if ever there was one. You should really stay off of the Trump topics. Just stick to other topics where you can make intelligent posts that are not influenced or overwhelmingly consumed by Trump hatred (TDS). But if you insist on embarrassing yourself, please explain how any person on the face of the Earth could endure four+ years of constant negative attacks by 99% of the media/Hollywood/Congress/etc., but still get as high as a 30-40 percent approval rating. If these entities would have attacked Obama in the same manner, what do you think his approval would have been? You are so focused on your hatred for Trump, you must justify that unjust analysis by blaming him, instead of blaming yourself for being so easily manipulated. A self-defense mechanism if ever there was one. Is Hillary still up by double digits in your poll you cited? How many different reasons are you going to offer as the definitive one as to why Trump lost? "Rantings of a lunatic"?

You are definitely more than welcome to attend. Just don't tell anyone you are a city boy. (Yes, Bridge City is a big city to us.)

Me too. I'm about to start a fire...with the firewood in my backyard. Hope nothing else burns. Neighbors are coming over. We might discuss who in Hollywood is sleeping with who. How is your night going? What topics are up for discussion in your little world?

Please explain how Trump cost the Republicans the House. I really don't care what you think, I'm just ready to spark our ol' time debates. Those were classic (embarrassing) weren't they. Are you ready? Will you cry to moderators again? I'm ready. Go.

Your turn...except this will be different. I highly admire CardinalBacker, just think he is emotionally triggered by Trump. You on the other hand, well what can I say. You bring no intellectual value to this board...so do you want to start in the gutter or gradually go there like ol' times. I say gutter-time. Didn't you score a zero last time you bowled?

Wow, you are falling way below what I thought you would stoop to. You might want to calm down about now. The hatred swirling in your brain is really making you look foolish. So sad, especially when I fully agree with you on 99% of your posts not concerning Trump. Take a break...you need it.

If that is what you consider as fair assessment across the board, then I can only sadly laugh at you.

This is just hilarious. You can't answer so you resort to name-calling, stereotyping, etc. No, you are not a man. You are wee intellectually-stunted little boy. Is this really where you want to go? Not desirable, but I have no problem playing that game with you. Your TDS is in full bloom. So much so, you are getting hysterical because someone doesn't agree with your blinded assessment. You might want to stay away from any threads dealing with Trump. By now you should know why. Would you like to re-evaluate your post? You need to.

Do you think your accusatory standard for "inciting an attack" would stand up to unbiased scrutiny? Should we hold everyone accountable to this bar? If so, how many Trump-haters in Congress would need to be or required to resign based on your standard of guilt? (You're Fired! -Trump) Would any Democrats be left in Congress? Are you being fair in your assessment? Should this standard be applied across the board, or just to people we don't like or agree with? Try to apply your same standard to someone you admire, and see if it still applies. I already know the answer. Edit: I just read one of your posts in another thread. This concerning Maxine Watters statement. Here is what you posted: "HOWEVER, nothing she did compares to organizing a rally that will conclude with a March to the Capitol to either intimidate lawmakers or even outright halt the Peoples Business by forcefully stopping the constitutional process of electing a new president...which is exactly what happened." She actually called for people to find any Congressman/politician, form a crowd, and get into their face saying they are not welcomed here. But somehow your bar deems this less intimidating that someone calling for a "peaceful protest" (I'm still learning from Lefties on how to frame the narrative...which is a little embarrassing). Can you at least be consistent...across the board...in your evaluations. Of course you can't, because if you did your arguments would fall apart.

You seem to have no problem placing blame based on severe TDS. And that is the reality! If you were a House Representative, would you now vote to impeach President Trump?

Lost it...LOL. You blame someone for the actions of others because you think you can interpret what he meant, and how those words were interpreted by others. Your TDS is flaring up again.

Oh, but Bernie riled that guy up. Bernie didn't say go shoot them, but we all know what he meant, don't we.

So based on this, we can say with 100% positivety that Bernie Sanders is to blame for Republican congressmen being shot at their baseball practice.

When has ethics ever been a priority in big time College Football? LOL.

Balmorhea's road to the championship was unreal. They were ranked #1, but after the first round had to beat the #2, #3, #4, then #5 ranked teams in the State (in that order). Very impressive, especially considering Richland Springs was looking to extend their football state title total lead (and the first double digit title holder in the state). Katy is looking good to catch Richland Springs now. Congrats to Balmorhea. Well deserved.

Do these employees have the right to walk off the job and seek employment elsewhere? Do these employees have the right to form a union and demand safer work conditions. Please elaborate on your opinion of the oppression of the American worker. This topic sounds ripe for discussion. But every time I try to evoke this conversation, it always ends with the other party running like a frightened schoolgirl. Maybe you will stand up with an intellectual debate on whether corporations/big business/small business/Mom & Pop stores/Federal government/State government/Local government gives the working man a fighting chance of standing up to their greedy bosses. (And FYI, I assure you that you have no idea where I stand...so keep those stereotypes you are so famous for where you know they go.) Would you like to have this discussion? I will start a new topic just for this if agreeable.

So I'm guessing that you also abhor "star" athletes making maybe 20 times more than there fellow teammates...plus bonuses. Everyone on the team should make the same amount. Am I correct...or would you like to elaborate on your position?

I highly doubt you will be able to post on here after the first few weeks of the next four years. How long do you think this stint will last, Silly Willy? (You might as well change your screen name to Silly Willy because...well, you know.) Do you think Biden could outsmart you, Silly Willy? Of course, even you can realize that was a rhetorical question. But then again, let's hear your honest opinion...for ol' time comedic sake.

That's a lot of whining from someone complaining about whining.

Stereotyping as usual. What does Jan 20th mean to me? Will I be shocked? Will I be elated? You are pathetically bad at avoiding questions by deflection. You try...but just look foolish. So as a reminder to you, while everyone laughs at your childish antics, answer the questions previously posed. I bet you can't. I'll even drop down to your middle school level...and double dog dare you to reveal your evidence that Trump will defiantly refuse to leave the Whitehouse. I triple dog dare you (that is the ultimate ultimatum in middle school) to provide evidence of conspiracy theory inclusion that I have participated in...like you suggest. If you are even remotely adequate at backing up your claims, you should have no problem. I bet you deflect again. (Safest best in America. I think Hamshire-Fannett has a better chance of beating North Shore in football than you answering the questions.)

Yes it is exhausting. And no, not any of the alleged voter fraud accusations have been "explained away". Someone claims something, someone says that is not true...and your conclusion is that it's been "explained away". TDS is still making you look foolish. That is real TDS, not some made-up reversal crap you are still trying to peddle. Has the Hunter Biden story been "explained away"? Has the Trump/Russia collusion story been "explained away"? Did Hillary delete 30,000 subpoenaed emails? Is CornPop a real guy, or a bad dude somehow frightened by Biden? Are we alone in this universe? Does TDS affect the believability of each question? What is your definition of "explained away"? Did a late night TV comedian give you this information? You have made some of the most unfounded allegations, and others look at those allegations and the multitude of them as proof of the clown show you are perpetrating. You call Trump trash, a clown show, etc., but yet you can't back up those allegations...because if you did, and you know this, the hypocrisy of your allegations proves you are the clown show, or is it just trash. I'll have to go back to your previous posts for an accurate accounting...but that is a worthless endeavor. Yes it is crazy...and exhausting. Did you ever research the leadership Trump perpetuated in Operation Warp Speed? Did you ever try to analyze the accomplishments Trump achieved versus the "failures" that you attribute so much weight to your analysis? Topics you quickly ran from. Who is the real clown show? Exhausting!

How many wild conspiracy theories void of any evidence will you throw out there? Wow, the hypocrisy is deep right here.

What evidence do you have that Trump will not leave the Whitehouse? Please show some proof of your theory. You can't can you. Nothing but a wild conspiracy based on absolutely nothing. The anti-Trump media you parrot is making you look like a fool...and then you accuse others of being foolish. You might want to look up the definition of hypocrite. You might see your picture. What have I put out? Point to a post. You can't can you. As well as being a premier hypocrite, you are also guilty of wild stereotyping. You must be proud of yourself...until reality sets in.