Englebert

I'm curious as to how long it will take some numskull to accuse me of equating illegals with poop.

Walls don't work...just like toilets don't work. Would anybody like to defend Nancy Pelosi and the Liberal position that a wall will not work? Is a wall not technically capable of deterring an invasion? Is better technology the best (and most cost efficient) solution...so much so that centuries old ingenuity is obsolete? Do we need to improve old (but proven) technology with 21st century electronic gadgetry? What about the pea trap? Should this accessory be considered "modern" technology? My question to Liberals would be: If the toilet was non-existent today, how do you think a modern engineer would solve the need for one? Would a computer chip be involved? Would we want Pelosi in charge of dictating the specs of said invention? My shower drain plugged today. After using Drano and Liquid-Plumr to no avail, I thought about sending down my flexible stick camera to access the situation. But the tried and true old fashioned plunger fixed the problem...which led me to this food for thought. Please feel free to respond.

FIFY History has shown over and over and over that is fact and not opinion. But shockingly, more and more people keep clamoring for bigger government...begging to be controlled. I just don't get it. Sorry to butt in on y'alls conversation. Carry on.

Pelosi and Biden are "enlightened", so nothing else matters.

Why would you say you must have touched a nerve? I did not imply anything other than wanting an explanation of your statement. You stated that "'WE' have been pulling the life out of her for years". I'm assuming you mean Man has been pulling...implying Man is the culprit of seemingly climate change. If that was your contention, then I would like further evidence to substantiate that claim. What would you like to be enlightened about? You make an assertion, then ask me to clarify? I don't recall "debate" working that way. If you want to blame Man for perceived disruption of the climate, then by all means...back it up. I hope I didn't touch a nerve for having the audacity to ask you to clarify one of your own statements.

I don't know how to interpret that statement in any other way than accusing Man as the causation of every climate fluctuation of Earth. I would like to get a clarification.

What factors has Man perpetuated that leads you to believe we've been "pulling the life out of [Earth] for years" which will cause the Earth to blow? I would like to know these factors as they relate to an increase in volcanic activity and polar migration (the topics of this post). We can venture into other phenomenons as well, but let's stick to the topic at hand first. So please elaborate on what you think is the Man-made casual factors of these two things.

Maybe we can buy carbon credits to stall the pending eruption. Yeah, that should work. Or maybe we can send billions of American taxpayer dollars to foreign countries. Yep, that should also work. If not, we can always just pass a law forbidding the eruption.

You are just too funny. I'm surprised you try to engage in psychoanalysis when you have no training, and you are incredibly bad at it. Apparently you have zero insight into your own shortcomings (lack of self-awareness). It doesn't take formal training to see that. You make pathetic statements and I challenge you to back them up or simply call out the incorrect or untruthfulness of them. You lash out or deflect because you cannot justify you own statements. You get mad because I have the audacity to call you out on your own statements. So, I challenge you to justify your statements about me. Show were I am stuck and afraid of change. Show where I think my shortcomings are perfect. Show where I think I'm better than everyone else. These are just prime examples of your naive, immature, childish statements that you cannot defend. It seems these evolve from a vain attempt to "save face" by lashing out at the one that challenges you. So give some examples that lead to your conclusions (we are in need of some more laughs). And fyi, I did not call you a moron. I cloaked a statement in an analogy to show the absurdity of your statements. You (predicatively) misinterpreted that as a direct descriptor. Now given your subsequent posts, was the analogy prophetic? Is it still opinion or is it now fact? Given your demonstrated inability to distinguish between the two, this might be a tough one for you. Giving a forum for someone to show their true colors is all I've done. You childishly engaged in such admission, and predicatively lashed out when you cannot defend your own pathetic statements. You don't seem to be having any fun...and it's easy to see why. Embarrassed yet? If not, you should be.

That is definitely an opinion. Since you don't know the difference...you're welcome.

You trying to take the high road...now that's entertainment. Coming from someone that doesn't know the difference between fact and opinion, you are quite amusing. Maybe the United States Attorney General can explain the difference to you. And it's probably best you refrain from responding. Each post you offer shows your lack of intelligence.

The toddlers are laughing at you again. Let's see if we can attempt an explanation this way: You are a moron. Your posts leave no shadow of a doubt that you are a moron. Is that a fact or an opinion?

And you have been proven wrong. It is your opinion, just as I stated in my first post on this...one that you tried to argue. Do you know the difference between opinion and fact? Your previous posts emphatically scream "NO".

So it's all opinion, not "fact"...which was my only point. Why are you trying to argue against the obvious?

Do you think the millions of Russian citizens consider their own country a threat to the U.S.? Do you think many Russian citizens consider the U.S. a threat to Russia? Do you consider the U.S. a threat to Russia? Is this your opinion or is it fact?

You definitely quoted the correct post on this one. And it is very, very difficult, if not impossible, to have a "debate" with someone that doesn't know fact from opinion, which is the only thing I was challenging. Do you really think you possess debating skills? Now that is funny.

I highly doubt that. Then again, you tend to read what you want to read, then employ mental gymnastics to make everything fit into your own alternate reality...so then again, maybe you did enjoy it. I know we enjoyed laughing at you.

You claimed it as FACT. I called you out saying it was an opinion. Why do you keep embarrassing yourself? And why are you claiming I said anything about Fox News? The fantasy world you live in is fodder for us sane folks. Keep the entertainment going.

It's fairly evident you are not qualified to rate anything. You don't even know the difference between fact and opinion, but I guess that is expected with someone ate up with TDS.

You continue to embarrass yourself. You claim Russia is a clear and present danger. Maybe true, maybe not. What is crystal clear is that it is an opinion, even though you hilariously claim that as fact. You claim Trump will not be reelected in 2020. Maybe true, maybe not. Again, this is opinion and not fact. The 3rd graders are still laughing. You claim U.S. Generals refuse to work for Trump. You are so cute when you try to claim facts. I'll just stop here. It's hard to type when you are laughing...especially at and not with someone. You tried to pass your opinions as fact, which shows how woefully devoid you are of common sense. But please keep trying, you might catch up one day. In the meantime, we can keep laughing at you.

I agree with your points. When you said there were "too many flaws with the system", I wasn't sure if you were referring to our system of government (the constitution, laws, rules of governance) or the two party system. As for your statement "we have no one to blame but ourselves", I couldn't agree more. I don't think term limits should be necessary, but the voting history of our electorate has shown that term limits would probably help a whole lot. I would vote in favor of term limits if given the choice.

Trolling you. Of course, you make that easy. Please back up your claim that I think I'm smart. What evidence points you in this direction? Put up or shut up. We know, we know, you will just run. Who was it that tried to claim that we couldn't have an intellectual conversation on this board because of the Conservatives? Who tried to claim that me and the Conservatives ran off many of the other posters due to childish comments? Again, who made those claims? You've shown your intellectual prowess on this board time and time again. In the profane words of westend1..boo hoo and LOL.

Wow. Do you really want to repeat your embarrassing display of lack of knowledge again, coupled with your condescension that only a child could relate to. From you post: Fact: More terror suspects have entered the U.S from Canada than from Mexico. Opinion. More have been caught on the northern border. We don't have a clue as to how many have actually entered from either border. Considering Canada has a stricter boarder, one can assume that more would get caught on that border. Again, clearly Opinion. Fact: Russia is clear and present danger. Opinion: Obama, Hillary, and most of the Democrats didn't think Russia was a clear and present danger until Trump was elected. Fact: U.S. has begun to withdraw from Syria. (Russia benefits) Opinion: Time will tell if Russia benefits. Until then it is conjecture, therefore opinion. Fact: Russia landed two Nuclear bombers in Venezuela. Fact: Manafort owes Russia $10 million. Fact: Trump believes Putin over United States Flat out lie. How embarrassing for you to repeat Democrat talking points. Fact: Wall is smoke and mirrors Opinion naturally...and oh so silly. Again, how embarrassing for you to repeat Democrat talking points. Fact: US. Airports are vulnerable due to Government shutdown. Possibly, but still opinion. I wouldn't argue this one if you was the only point you tried to make. Fact: Trump gives Saudi Prince a pass. Until you define and list what was discussed between the two, it remains OPINION. Fact: Obama and Clinton cannot help. What's your point? Fact: U.S. Generals refuse to work for this President (Republican or Democrat) Too many acting positions. Flat out lie. Again, how embarrassing for you. Fact: Trump is not Republican True. And most people agree. What's your point? Fact: Border Security is not a wall. EL CHAPO escaped from Mexico prison under a wall Are your really trying to further the tired and untruthful Democrat talking point that people believe a wall will fix everything? Really, are you trying to push this narrative. If so, how oh so embarrassing for you. Fact: Drones are used to go over walls. So? What's your point? Fact: Dem or Rep. can justify a shurdown. I can only laugh at this line. Fact: Muller will show and tell. Maybe, not likely. Still very much OPINION. Fact: South Korea and China pose a present threat to the U.S. Probably China, probably not South Korea. Do you even know which country is the communist one ran by a dictator. Facts point to no. And of course, another OPINION. Fact: 2020 will not be a repeat. Clearly Opinion. If this was a graded test you would not rate up to an F. This has to be really embarrassing for you.

What does stating opinions (many wrong) as "fact" make a person? The entertainment value of this board is on the rise again.

Here was your chance to invoke an intellectual conversation on this board, provide contradictory evidence to the premise of the topic to kickstart a debate, and your reply is "Boo hoo". Correct me if I'm wrong (rhetorical as can be) but who was the person, on multiple occasions, that tried to blame me and many other posters of preventing intellectual debates on this board? You constantly make childish posts like this, which is fine, but then try to blame others for the direction of the debate. In fact, my choice to fight back at the childishness with childishness was based mainly on you. And as your past posts have shown, you will just run like a frightened schoolgirl, only to emerge at a later date flailing childish quips while screaming the inability for debate is due to Conservatives. Seriously, how are you not embarrassed?