Englebert

Lamar University. That backfired on you nicely. I guess that's what happens when you are judgmental. Thank you stevenash. We've "sensed" that a while back about you, hence the condescending posts aimed at you. You have no clue about what I know and don't know, yet you made a judgement anyway, then have the nerve to preach how you don't judge people. How are you not embarrassed? Seriously, how?

Again, TDS at it's finest. If you wouldn't run so much, we can have a debate on who lies more: You, Obama, or Trump. Would you like to have this debate?

OMG! I see your TDS treatment has not taken effect yet.

According to your Liberal press, Trump was unhinged the day he was inaugurated. Since then he has become more erratic on a daily bases. So please explain how he can become more erractic now. Is there some sort of scale? He's been above 10 on your "erratic" scale since moving into the Whitehouse. How high does your scale reach? Can you go any higher than 10?

The official term is TDS moment, and we are used to them by now. The first step is admitting you have a problem. Thank you. You can now begin your road to recovery.

You keep getting funnier the more you post. Please show evidence of my inflated ego. You actually (and very laughably) try to pass off me asking you a question as me in need of help. Remind us of where you obtained your psychology degree. And you claim I have an inflated ego. You are just too comical. Too bad we are not laughing with you. And once again you failed to answer the original (or any) question. Embarrassed yet? Most people would be. And you have the nerve to question stevenash for not answering your question. My original post asked how a Liberal can dismiss guilt when being hypocritical. How did you feel when making that post? How did you prevent an overwhelming feeling of guilt?

You refusing to answer a question leads you to believe I'm diagnosing. Now that is comical. Seriously, how are you not embarrassed (which ironically is the whole point of this thread)? For bonus points, please explain how your post went over my head. (It's very hard typing while laughing, but I was able to get this sentence posted through perseverance.) I know, in typical Liberal fashion you will again run from the questions, try to deflect with attacks, then claim you are intellectually superior. We've seen it before. Maybe the laughter you are hearing is not really just in your head.

Are you refusing to answer because you don't know the answer, or is it because you know how ridiculous your answer will be? One more time (j/k), how do YOU rid yourself of guilt when offering pathetic posts?

I was asking for advice, which you failed to provide in your reply. So once again, how do you rid yourself of guilt?

Really? Based on your response you definitely fooled me, but affirmed my post. How do you rid yourself of guilt?

The ol' equivalency ploy. Both sides do it. Did you even read my post?

I was thinking that same thing as I typed.

I'll need to check the secret history books to formulate my answer. Ooops, I don't have access to those. In all seriousness, I really don't know, and really haven't followed the reasoning for our involvement in Syria. I've heard rhetoric for and against, and frankly don't know who to believe. Maybe someone that has more knowledge of the situation can answer for the Republicans. What are the Democrats thoughts on the issue?

I heard the same thing. I don't know if it is true or not, but it would be a reason to plead guilty. I also heard that Flynn is pleading guilty to this charge in order for Mueller to drop charges for more severe actions (failure to register as a foreign agent, which also has nothing to do with "Russian collusion").

Backup those claims. Oh yeah, you can't. I'm sure your thinking of the ol' mantra "if he's White, he is a racist". Although that qualifies as proof for Liberals, it doesn't qualify as proof on this board. If you call someone a racist that is really not a racist, does that make you a liar? And yet you throw stones.

Like I said, please proceed if you feel the need to endure that embarrassment again. Maybe you can lead us to the source of those secret history books you claim to know about. Can you top the whoppers Obama told? That's rhetorical considering I don't think it is possible for anyone to top his gems. You do know that he said his administration was scandal free.

I'm having an issue that I'm hoping you Liberals can help me with. As I have stated on multiple posts, since Trump has assumed the Presidency I have been mimicking the Liberal tactic of personal attacks when "debating" (LOL) with Liberals. The problem I am having is that I still feel bad after using this tactic. How do you Liberals absolve yourself of this innate guilt? Is it just a matter of conditioning through abundant use or do you employ some other sort of self-defense mechanism(s)? Is it an over-reliance of "the ends justify the ends" mantra? (That one would be lost on me and downright hopeless.) Is it a matter of teaching yourself to ignore controvertible facts? Or maybe employing a tactic of twisting facts to align with a pre-conceived outcome? Or possibly a combination of just ignoring anything that doesn't conform and over-weighting a reliance on conforming data. For any Liberal out there that knows the answer, please enlightened me. I'm also very curious as to how you rid yourself of the guilt of running when confronted to backup claims. I haven't employed this tactic yet, but Liberals seem to be really good at making outrageous claims, run, then re-appear as if the subject was never offered. I'm not sure if I could ever master this tactic, but please share a blueprint of that path. But the biggest feat that fascinates me is how Liberals can endure unadulterated hypocrisy without an ounce of shame. This one seems beyond the understanding of the premier scientists/psychologists. I know I will never be able to compete in this realm, but please share any insight. Since the Liberals claim to encompass the best and brightest (and elitists), I'm confident that many enlightened responses will be imminent.

You tried that thread before, and was unmercifully embarrassed (well, normal people what have been). If you want to re-live that experience, please proceed. See if you can top the Obama lie when he said his administration was free of any scandals. I'm pretty sure that lie cannot be topped by anyone.

Have you been drinking, or just acting like a typical non-sensical Liberal? You quoted my post with a reply containing this statement? Are you purposely being obtuse to elicit sympathy? Please explain your rationale for quoting my post then refusing to address anything in it. I'm thinking I will go with drunk because I can't fathom another probable excuse. Please enlighten me.

Just like I thought...you run when confronted. Nobody is stirring hatred but you. And who is it that you speak of that wants to "stir up the fire". Please give some examples of the hatred that surrounds this political forum. I'm guessing your comprehension skills are less that adequate. You read what you want to read instead of what is actually written. That is a prime example of "stirring hatred". And why didn't you jump in all of the times we (many on this board) have been called racists just for being White? Oh yeah, you read what you want to read, then place blame on where you want to place blame. Are you proud of yourself? You get all worked up about a comment you misinterpreted, then childishly run when confronted, all the while blaming others for stirring hatred. Sadly, this board has seen too many examples of this pathetic behavior.

I have proven nothing. You choose not to answer because you know how ridiculous your answer will be. Are you as embarrassed as BlueDove should be? Why take the coward way out? Please put your mental skills on display and elaborate on what offended you so much that you should tell me to "pull up". Is it the list you can't compose, or the mention of race? I'm pretty sure most on here could easily see the ridiculousness of my example to mirror the ridiculousness of Bluedove's contention, but I have a feeling that is the point that flew way over your head. I could be wrong...so please, explain yourself.

Please elaborate on my "out of lineness". Do you think you can compose this list? Please, since you want to jump in, defend Bluedove's contentions with your analysis. Or maybe you are one of those ("you people" as BlueDove would say) that think any mention of race is somehow "racist". If so, again, please elaborate on what you find offensive. I have not intentions of "pulling up", whether it is with you or Bluedove (the person that has repeatedly called me and practically everyone on this board a racist with no backing proof). So let's start with your rationale for me "pulling up". Go.

Additional info from a 2017 poll: Hillary is still leading by double digits over Donald Trump and has a 100% chance of winning the Presidency by a landslide. Polls are great aren't they. Have you seen the poll numbers for people that have faith in the truthfulness of the media. Google that. And which person was indicted or plead guilty to Russian collusion? Name one please. If I went into a restaurant looking for child molesters, but had authority to arrest and indict anyone found breaking any law, does that mean everyone in the restaurant is a child molester based on a few unrelated charges? That would be quite silly, don't you agree? ...and the entertainment value keeps rising, and the faith in the American voter keeps plummeting.

Give me a list of those indicted and/or going to prison for Russian collusion. Do you have to be a complete sheeple to compose this list of nothing? Again, how are you not embarrassed? So as to be perfectly clear...please do what you said you could do and compose that list. The 6th graders have had a good laugh, let's at least let the 2nd graders join in on the entertainment. Let me join in on the Liberal fun. A friend of mine's second cousin, who is Black, was just sentenced to prison for drug possession with the intent to distribute. My conclusion: all Black people and all second cousins are drug dealers. As you laugh at this, just remember you are the epitome of this analogy.

Is Hillary still leading by double digits in that poll? Are these the same people that hilariously voted for Hillary? Do these people have a problem with someone stating that the American government is not willingly spying on us (i.e. blatant lie)? Do these same people have a problem with someone stating that four Americans (including an American ambassador) were assassinated due to a video (i.e. blatant lie)? Do these same people have a problem with someone saying that he didn't spy on reporters, didn't authorize spying on an opposition campaign, said the I.R.S. wasn't corrupt in targeting Conservative groups, said "you can keep your doctor" and "you can keep your healthcare plan" (all blatant lies) while simultaneously covering up "Fast and Furious". Do these people ignore evidence while blindly following what the Liberal media tells them to believe like a good little sheeple? Are these same people attempting an unAmerican ploy of convicting someone with little absolutely to no evidence? Do you have to be an unabashed brainwashed sheeple to post a link like this with the acquiescent "not surprising at all" quip? Yes, the quote is quite clear, evidence has shown that the sheeple are alive and thriving. Would you like to debate any of the above mentioned topics or will you run to your safe space? The entertainment value of this board is now on the same path as our economy.