Englebert

I'm highly certain that Clarence Thomas being a joke and a horrible or lousy justice is not a universally shared or accepted notion. Many, many, many people, including me, think he is a good justice. He is a constitutionalist or originalist, and favors states rights over an strong central government. This upsets many of the Left (and even those that are slightly Left-leaning). It's been a long time since I've read his bio or any of his decisions, but I was under the impression then that he was a good justice, and I don't have any reason to change that opinion now.

You forgot a bunch of other pathetic stereotypes. Do you not remember them? They are regurgitated by the Liberals on an hourly basis. How about a refresher. Along with being a bunch of gun worshippers and uninformed zombies, the more popular descriptors are racist, homophobic, misogynistic, xenophobic, racist (again), deplorable, intolerant, hateful, racist (again), spiteful, idiotic, Bible thumpers, racist (again), violent, unstable, racist (again). We want to throw granny over the cliff, want dirty air and water, want people to die slowly, want to deprive people of health care, are scared of illegals, support Whites who commit crimes based on race, support mass murderers (regardless of the race/religion/ideology of their targets), support racists, support Russia, hate the poor, hate all gays, hate all minorities, hate all immigrants (legal and illegal), hate anyone that doesn't look like us... Which ones did I miss? I know there are a lot more. It would take someone with a recordable IQ to remember half of them. I see you can only remember two.

I'll volunteer if I can get the same deal as Ford. How much money did she end up making (that we know of)?

The playoff seeding is not affected one bit by the outcome of this game. WOS has already clinched the top spot. HF will get 3rd if HJ beats Liberty or 4th if Liberty beats HJ, regardless of the outcome of the WOS/HF game. I have no idea how this will affect the coaching decisions (for both teams). I'm fairly certain that HF would love to beat WOS, and I'm also fairly certain that WOS does not want to lose to HF. The incentives for the coaches are a little different.

Why? So we can get higher taxes and more government regulations, which will stifle the economy. We just witnessed under Obama the very thing that "Blue" wants to drag us back to. And for a bonus, we get to be called racist, misogynist, homophobic, xenophobic, deplorable, intolerant, despicable human beings. Well, you almost changed my mind...but not quite. Please list some of the advantages and societal gains that will be achieved under a Blue regime. This should be hilarious.

You would be a rarity now-a-days if that is indeed your attitude. Should those that speak out against the practice be subjected to mockery? There are many, many, many examples of the perpetually offended, and these people seem to be multiplying at an exponential rate. I have no problem with these people being made fun of. But making "jokes" at the expense of wounded warriors should be a line in the sand, just as making "jokes" about skin color. The so-called joke had nothing to do with that person's behavior outside of military service, it was said because the guy was a serviceman. That is just disgusting, no matter who you are.

I can't speak for the rest of the board, but my responses were due to your "mocking". You defended a disgusting behavior, then "mocked" those that spoke out about it. That was disgusting behavior in itself. So the next time someone uses the "N-word" in jest, don't dare speak out against it...lest you be mocked. Is this the acceptable behavior now?

If it is impossible for a White man to understand what racism is, then it is impossible for a Black man to understand what racism is. You are trying to make a comparative statement in which only you can see both sides. Not only that, but you then have the gall to claim you can "understand" the plight of a whole race of people in which you have never interacted. I'm curious as to how you can claim victimhood in such a condescending manner. Now that is a feat.

So you can get offended, as you stated, but if someone else is offended then they are a snowflake. When you were a kid, did you ever think about mocking or deriding a serviceman that was injured in the act of defending this country? (And please don't try the equivalency ploy. I was offended when Trump made those comments about McCain, just as I am offended now by this so-called comedian. There's no hypocrisy here, even though you seem to want to spew that fantasyland alternate reality that lives in your head.)

Since you asked, here's a bunch of them: [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] Just failed jokes. Move along please, nothing to see here. Is this the attitude you want displayed...you know, your attitude? And how about the use of the "N" word by White people...used jokingly of course. Is this acceptable to you as "just a failed joke"?

So if he used the "N' word...in the form of comedy...you would be okay with that Snowflake? There is such a thing as boundaries. Your side constantly lets us know that, although these move according to ideology. How dare you impugn the "right" of Americans to call out this repugnant form of "comedy". Why are you trying to stifle first amendment rights by posting such intolerant and hateful speech? You are definitely an intolerant racist, misogynistic, homophobic, xenophobic deplorable. We should boycott your workplace until you are fired. I can joke too, but only a true snowflake can find humor in that. Liberalism is fun, but so tiring. I can't remember which groups to hate in what situation.

Is the poll for who we want to win or who we think will win?

As far as I can tell, if HJ beats Liberty, HF claims 3rd, HJ gets 4th, and Liberty is out. If Liberty beats HJ, Liberty gets 3rd, HF is 4th and HJ is out. So basically, the outcome between HJ/Liberty determines 3rd/4th and the HF/WOS game means nothing...regarding playoff teams and seeding. If Liberty wins and HF wins, both will be tied at 2-2 and Liberty gets 3rd based on head-to-head and HF claims 4th.. If Liberty wins and HF loses, Liberty (2-2) gets 3rd and HF gets 4th (1-3). If Liberty loses and HF wins, HF will get 3rd with 2-2 record while HJ (1-3) will claim 4th based on head-to head with Liberty (1-3). if Liberty loses and HF loses, a three-way tie will be created for the 3rd and 4th spots. All three teams are tied head-to-head. So point differential will determine the 3rd spot. HF has this outright: a +18 win over HJ and a -3 loss to Liberty = +15. Liberty will have a +3 over HF and a negative against HJ, so the highest Liberty can get is +2. HJ has a -18 against HF and a positive against Liberty. Even if HJ beats Liberty by over 18, they can only get to a 0 in differential...therefore HF will automatically win the 3rd spot. The fourth spot will then go head-to-head, in which case HJ will be the qualifier.

You keep calling me a racist...with absolutely zero hint of proof. Oh, my bad, I called you out. I guess in your world that is proof. The laughter should have made you deaf by now. Not only are you a bigot, you are also "scareed". Address the points listed above instead of running like a frightened schoolgirl. Your blinding hatred results in comedic gold for everyone reading your posts. And yes, your answer to the immigration issue is to elect Beto. This could very well fix the problem. Beto's policies, if enacted, would turn this country into another failed state, so nobody would want to come here. No thanks.

I didn't miss your point at all. Neither did anyone else. You are the one that is exhibiting delirious delusions. Congress conducted 24 investigations without ever realizing Hillary had a private server. So no, they were not serious investigations. And I noticed you just ignored the other points of my post. Why is that? You "scareed" (is this some type of new word you are trying to invent)? The Constitution giving anchor babies the right to citizenship has long been debated, even amongst the most respected of constitutional scholars (but I wouldn't expect you to know that). Trump challenging this unsettled notion is somehow considered racist to you? And there is just another thrown race card. Can you hear the third graders laughing at your stupidity? And no, 95-99 percent of people crashing our border do not get sent back home. The Liberal media is making you look even more foolish than you manage to do on your own. And I know why you don't respect me. You are a bigot...and hate people that call you out. It's that simple. You are not nearly as complicated as you think you are. Again, the third graders comprehend the hatred and bigotry you exhibit for everyone to see. Now how about you embarrass yourself some more and keep posting. Elaborate on all of the things listed of Obama's actions for which he was not held accountable. You won't because you are a bigot...and you are "scareed".

You are not looking forward to accountability, you are wanting a partisan witchhunt. If you wanted accountability, you would be demanding investigations into Obama spying on AP reporters, Obama spying on James Rosen and his parents, Obama using fake information to spy on a rival Presidential campaign, Obama suppressing Fast and Furious documents, Benghazi caused by a video, IRS targeting Conservative groups, voter suppression ignored because of race, and many others. You've got nothing but an overplayed race card.

According to him, he is illustrating our hypocrisies. Please try to get him to explain...we might then get to enjoy some more of his own hypocrisies, and might get a bonus of childish name-calling.

Point out my hypocrisy about immigrants. Show your evidence of my hypocrisy. You have none. You are just a liar. Own it. And the people that live with me and around me don't go around calling me a racist for no reason. So no reason to feel sorry for them, though you might need to feel sorry for yourself. And again, your condescension is just laughable. You haven't the foggiest idea of how I feel, though you feel you are an expert. Most can see you are just a hateful bigot found of throwing ill-advised stereotypes and race cards whenever possible. We can all laugh at you, though you will probably interpret that as stress. How comical.

Easily, and by a Left leaning organization. I do dispute their "mixed" claim however: [Hidden Content] Now, do you enjoy spreading fake news and downright lies. After all, you have publicly stated that you adamantly abhor Trump because he lies (in your twisted fantasyland), but yet you engage in the same behavior you claim to abhor. Why is that? Seriously, why is that?

When have you ever tried to be reasonable? You spew garbage, use childish, derogatory names for the POTUS, and call us idiots and racists, all while perched on an imaginary pedestal. I'll give you this, it is comical. And if by some chance Hillary does become the Democrat nominee, I would be willing to bet money that you would vote for her.

You analytical skills are just atrocious. It is sometimes comical to witness a superiority complex from someone that is clearly mentally challenged coupled with overt bigotry. I'm not sure whether to laugh at your ignorance or feel sympathy for you.

1. Port Neches-Groves/Barbers Hill 2. Deer Park/Beaumont West Brook 3. Galena Park North Shore/Beaumont United 4. Franklin/Diboll 5. Groveton/Shelbyville 6. Goose Creek Memorial/New Caney 7. Houston Wisdom/Port Arthur Memorial 8. Crosby/Nederland 9. Vidor/Baytown Lee 10. Santa Fe/Dayton 11. Livingston/Bridge City 12. Little Cypress-Mauriceville/Huffman Hargrave 13. Lumberton/Splendora 14. Center/Huntington 15. Tarkington/Jasper 16. Hamshire-Fannett/Silsbee 17. Liberty/West Orange-Stark 18. East Chambers/Anahuac 19. Hardin/Buna 20. Warren/Orangefield 21. Woodville/Kirbyville 22. Newton/Corrigan-Camden 23. San Augustine/Deweyville 24. West Sabine/Hull-Daisetta 25. Evadale/Colmesneil

Childish, just childish. And you will not even address your own shortcomings. Let me join in... if Trump is fart then you are diarrhea. That was easy, and simplistic. And embarrassing. How do you expunge yourself of the overwhelming feeling of being a simpleton when engaging in such childish gibberish. I haven't been able to overcome that feeling yet. But if I keep engaging with Liberals, I'm sure I'll learn.

I'll bet with you (definitely not against) that any response will at minimum contain a childish name. After all, his posts have shown his maturity level. I'm guessing now that you've called him out, he will altar the descriptive, although a rise in decorum would be too elusive and beyond his pay grade. The Liberal media he considers the word of God is making him look foolish.

I thought about letting this go, on the grounds of sympathy and/or empathy...no, just sympathy. But wow, this just about sums up your whole life philosophy in grand statements. Let's review: Your first response in this topic was: And then we have this response You've repeatedly called Trump a liar, and given him cute little derogatory names. Now that it is proven you are the liar, how about we give you cute little derogatory names. But I'll be a sport, I'll let you suggest your own little derogatory name. How about fart (apologies for the plagiarism)? That fits you better than Trump, considering it is on a kindergarten level...therefore befitting. Should we now refer to you as fart or would you like to come up with your own? I apologize for not being able to fathom an appropriated age related insulting name...as my depths of debauchery can only stoop so low.