Englebert

I'm not going to comment on Breitbart, considering I have no clue. I don't think I've ever been on that site. But I have been on Huffington Post, Mother Jones, Politico/Politifact, Southern Law Poverty Center, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, New York Times, Washington Post, Bloomberg, Google News, and many others that are blatantly biased. Do you frequent any of those sites? If so, do you also consider yourself as "believing anything"? And if you are a good source of unbiased analyzation, how would you rate Breitbart compared to any of the listed nutwing Liberal rags mentioned? Is Breitbart more Right than they are Left, about the same, or more moderate? I would love to hear the breakdown from such an unbiased source. (Man it is hard to type while laughing.)

1. West Orange-Stark/Crosby 2. Diboll/Liberty 3. Evadale/Deweyville 4. Vidor/Little Cypress-Mauriceville 5. Splendora/Shepherd 6. Hardin-Jefferson/Huffman Hargrave 7. Livingston/Jasper 8. Lumberton/Concordia Lutheran 9. Huntington/Hamshire-Fannett 10. Silsbee/Bridge City 11. Tarkington/Danbury 12. Beckville/Hemphill 13. Coldspring-Oakhurst/Mexia 14. Corrigan-Camden/Joaquin 15. Beaumont Kelly/Kountze 16. Burkeville/Mt. Enterprise 17. Hull-Daisetta/Cushing 18. KIPP Houston/Colmesneil 19. Lovelady/Jewett Leon 20. San Augustine/Tenaha 21. West Sabine/Timpson 22. Oakwood/High Island 23. Chester/Orange Community Christian 24. Beaumont Legacy Christian/Houston Lutheran North 25. Victoria Faith/Baytown Christian

I kinda expected the guy to take off his hood to reveal he was Geraldo Rivera.

As bad as the video is, what is worse is that the Weather Channel tried to defend this man by saying he was standing on grass, and the individuals walking by were on concrete. From the article: The Weather Channel defended Seidel saying he was “trying to maintain his footing on wet grass” while the two people seen in the background were walking on concrete, The Washington Post reported. “It’s important to note that the two individuals in the background are walking on concrete, and Mike Seidel is trying to maintain his footing on wet grass, after reporting on-air until 1:00 a.m. ET this morning and is undoubtedly exhausted,” the channel said in a statement. Is the reporter so intellectually inept (stupid) that he couldn't just report from the safety of the concrete 5 feet behind him? Does anybody buy the Weather Channel's excuse for this intentional deception? The media really does think we are just that stupid. They get caught in deception, then try to spin out of it with an excuse that is just as much, if not more lame than the original deception. In a just world the reporter and the spokesman for the Weather Channel would be fired immediately.

Are we suppose to take you seriously when you don't even know who started the "Birther" movement? Seriously? And what's wrong with being a Trump supporter? Only intolerant people filled with hate for people who don't look or think like them can agree with your statement. And I guess my support for the president is overwhelming evidence that I must be a racist. Correct? Why do you hate America so much? Why do you want America to fail? We finally get a president in office that gets the economy back in the right direction, and all you do is complain about it, while falsely disparaging him at every turn. Yeah, you are someone we should take seriously. I'll have to insert the obligatory LOL here.

Is this the same Congressional Budget Office who laughingly said that Obamacare would reduce the cost of healthcare by $2500.00 per family? If so, and everyone knows it is, why would anyone heed anything that office has to say?

Ignoring those "values" is a virtue. Fabricating "values" and attributing them to non-Liberals is also a virtue in some circles. I wonder how Politifact would rate that?

Have you read the list of "lies" that Politifact is attributing to Cruz. The lie meter should be pointed straight at that rag of a biased organization. Try reading some of those "lies" without laughing at the pettiness and falsity of the Politifact writers. I couldn't. I'm a Trump supporter. What values do I espouse along with Trump that you claim that "I don't have a leg to stand on"? You clearly expressed some of your values on this board, and I'm curious to hear what a person espousing those values thinks is unfit values expressed by others. Please give us some examples of these unfit "values". The entertainment value of this board is sure to go up.

1. Port Arthur Memorial/Beaumont United 2. Newton/West Orange-Stark 3. West Sabine/Hemphill 4. Houston Lamar/Beaumont West Brook 5. Conroe Caney Creek/Vidor 6. Dayton/Porter 7. Kingwood Park/Barbers Hill 8. Nederland/Silsbee 9. Livingston/Liberty 10. Cleveland/Diboll 11. Jasper/Little Cypress-Mauriceville 12. Anahuac/Bridge City 13. Orangefield/Shepherd 14. Hamshire-Fannett/East Chambers 15. Hardin-Jefferson/Woodville 16. Tarkington/Beaumont Kelly Catholic 17. Coldspring-Oakhurst/Buna 18. Corrigan-Camden/Kirbyville 19. Port Neches-Groves/Tomball 20. Lumberton/Houston Furr 21. Kountze/Deweyville 22. West Hardin/Warren 23. Sabine Pass/Hull-Daisetta 24. Evadale/Galveston O'Connell 25. Houston KIPP/Hardin

What makes you think I hang my hat on any poll. Oh yeah, just that profiling you hate so much. Show me where I have shown any respect for any poll, then maybe we can elevate your comments from unintelligible to highly misinformed. But since that "proof" doesn't exist, we will just consider you the generalizing bigot you've shown yourself to be. Your reply has shown your comprehension skills have not improved. You called me (and many others) racist with absolutely no support for your contention, then laughingly say I've shown you nothing worthy of respect. Well, I called you out on it, which many people in this climate will not do. I don't care if you respect me or not. You are a bigot who deserves not quarter, and it would be shameful of me to show you any respect. The next time you run into a true racist, and the bile consumes your brain, just remember that you and him are one in the same. You are no better than the type of person you revile, maybe even less. And I get to laugh at your perplexing and idiotic condescension, just like the rest of the "deplorables" that see through your hate. But please keep posting, the entertainment value your bring to the board reminds us of why we need to vote.

Your reliance on the credibility of polls. Even a child could figure out what my post meant. Sorry you don't comprehend too well. Adding personal shots to your condescending posts is just hilarious. Again, it's like watching a kindergartner calling his teacher stupid.

Is Hillary still leading by double digits in those "credible" polls?

You pointed out some nonsense. Whose problem is that?

Shed those tears. That's seems like the best you can do. Like a kindergartner saying his teacher is stupid...just comical. Maybe one day you will shed the hate and learn to live in the real world.

So all of the polls showing Hillary up by double digit points were outliers? Or where they just outright lies?

You said it ad nauseam, but can't back it up. Just because you say it, doesn't make it true. In fact, it just makes you look silly.

Says the queen.

Why do Black cops arrest Blacks at the same rate as White cops? Why is that?

So where in the study does it show where White jurors convict Black people at a higher rate than Black jurors. You are clearly implying that the justice system is biased against Blacks based on racism. If this was the case, shouldn't Black jurors exonerate Black defendants at a higher rate than White jurors? Did the study even look at that? Where is the data that this study relied on?

Blah, blah, blah. You definitely implied it. If you have another claim for your accusation, please state it now. Now that would take some major mental gymnastics. Accuse others of being ignorant, then lash out when you are the one proven to be ignorant. How quaint. You get your panties in a wad when called out, then resort to personal attacks for cover. We've seen this story before, over and over and over again. And you get so upset when someone employs the same tactics on you. Except I will backup my claims. I would ask you to embarrass yourself some more by asking you to back up your statements, but we all know how that will go. I am curious as to why you continually try to berate people based on assumptions that you yourself are clearly guilty of. It's clear where the "problem" lies.

Who are the ones that wrongly convict Black people of murder? Are you trying to accuse White people of wrongly convicting Black people? Do your research then tell me whose ignorance is part of the problem.

If messing with us means making yourself look stupid, then I agree. Oh, and calling us racist. Don't forget that "doozy". And yes, it is hard, if not impossible, to reason with people that can't back up their own accusations and simply throw the race card out as some type of cover. Yes, it is very difficult to reason with that kind of people. Do you hear the bell inside your head?

1. Beaumont United/Nederland 2. Silsbee/Newton 3. Beaumont Kelly/Beaumont Legacy 4. West Hardin/Hull-Daisetta 5. West Brook/Houston Strake Jesuit 6. Galena Park/Dayton 7. Houston Madison/Port Arthur Memorial 8. Huntsville/Port Neches-Groves 9. Manvel/Crosby 10. New Caney/Houston Heights 11. Barbers Hill/Montgomery 12. Orange Community Christian/High Island 13. Liberty/Cleveland 14. Bridge City/Jasper 15. Kirbyville/Lumberton 16. Orangefield/Livingston 17. Diboll/Huntington 18. East Chambers/Hardin-Jefferson 19. Kountze/Hamshire-Fannett 20. Edna/Anahuac 21. Buna/Hemphill 22. New Waverly/Hardin 23. Woodville/Madisonville 24. Warren/Evadale 25. Beckville/West Sabine

If you hate Trump, but can't give valid reasons for the hatred, what does that say about you? Does POS come to mind? I guess you are still stuck on that bogus racism rhetoric.

Gladly, as I have read many of these types of "studies" before. Many studies like this have been shot down...repeatedly...when analyzing the supporting data. Many of these studies compare what the author(s) claim as "exact same crime" only to find out they were not the same exact crimes. Some also fail to take into account criminal history. This one claims to include that factor, but without the raw data to analyze we have to take the author's word for it. There can be many factors involved, so without an independent analyzes of said data, we just have to buy the author's claims. Considering that most of these studies have been shot down in the past, I'll wait for independent verification. Studies have also found that poor Whites get longer sentences than rich Whites, and poor Blacks get longer sentences than rich Blacks...although these studies are also subject to flaws in methodology and mitigating factors. I'm guessing you are trying to suggest overt racism is the cause for these longer sentences...and you might be right. I'm curious as to why these studies never look at particular judges. If certain judges are handing out longer sentences to Blacks, therefore accounting for the disparities, why aren't these judges being called out? Could it be that these people have looked at particular judges, and found that Black judges also give longer sentences to Black men, in congruence with White judges? After all, studies have shown that Black police officers stop Black drivers at the same rate as White officers. Could this be a similar case? I've also seen a study (don't remember any follow-up or corroborating studies) that show Black jurors convict Black men on par with White jurors.