Englebert

Can you elaborate on the bias or ridiculousness in the article? I haven't read it yet, and might not. But since you think it is, I would love to know why you think this article should be banned from inclusion on this site.

If you stick to responses like your last one instead of just complaining, this could be a very good site.

I doubt if I would have even known about the article if it wasn't posted on here, considering I spend all of my waking hours on this site alone. Given that fact, it is highly credible that link was posted for general knowledge, instead of making fun of Liberals. I'm guessing both. Does it have to have a purpose if it doesn't adhere to the Liberal talking points? What is your purpose for complaining about it? Are you actually trying to stifle 1st amendments rights? Maybe this site wouldn't be so one-sided if more people would start a discussion on an topic instead of complaining about the content of the links. I guess it's just too hard to defend the Liberal agenda. If someone wrote an individual article about each of the persons/groups/organizations that were targeted by the IRS, should we complain about the articles being too one-sided and we need more balance? Asking me my intent for this site cannot be construed any other way than personal. And I have noticed that 99% of the time questions like these are asked just as a deflection from the topic. I could be wrong, but I don't think so.

That line was for Kountzer. What makes you think I spend hours a day on this site? And so what if I do? Do my posts get any more or any less credible based on the time I spend on here? Do you have a point for asking the question? Now about you. Do you feel so helpless that you are subjected to "ridiculous" articles that somehow you can't ignore them. Shouldn't you call out the ridiculousness of the articles instead of just complaining about their presence? So why do you attempt to deflect the conversation to a personal one about me? I could choose to ignore your post and complain about it, or I can call on you to explain your rationale. You can do the same for the ridiculous articles. It's not a hard concept. Blaming someone for posting ridiculous articles without challenging them is just ridiculous. I responded to these accusations to call out the ridiculousness of them. I fully expected the response to take a personal direction. I gleaned that tidbit of knowledge from hours on this site. Humorous isn't it.

I would suggest then to challenge the "ridiculous" article by stating why the article is ridiculous. Maybe after a discussion on the veracity of the article, if it is indeed ridiculous, then the poster might scrutinize his links more carefully. Just sitting back and fuming about a poster offering ridiculous links is childish. Join the discussion or ignore the posts. Complaining without offering a counter argument is misplacing blame. And I'm curious as to what you mean by "stirring the pot". Is posting Liberal propaganda on a Conservative website "stirring the pot"? What about the opposite? Does it matter if the material is accurate? Do you think people are posting links on here to provide information, or just trying to piss off other posters? That could be an interesting discussion the next time someone "stirs the pot". Just call them out on it and see what the response is.

Playing into what? Are you suggesting that someone shouldn't post an article because they think somebody else might not want to see something that person can just ignore anyway?

And you can't argue a single point about lib this and lib that. The articles on here illustrate the mentally of the Liberals in the age of Trump. If you disagree, then argue the point. And if you want to illustrate the mentally of the non-Liberals, feel free to post the articles and we can discuss. It seems to me the reason that the majority of articles on here show the Liberals in a bad light is a direct and corresponding indication of the current news, and the fact that the Liberals can't defend their own's actions. So if you are tired of Liberals getting called out, defend them. I bet even you know their actions are indefensible. But to come on here and try to place blame on people posting links is weak and childish. Your inaction is the problem, and misplacing blame is pathetic.

I can tell by your continuing posts that you are a race monger who believes most, if not all White people are racist. And I can tell for a fact you haven't the foggiest idea of what I think or feel, only that you shamelessly spout your unskilled analysis based on zero evidence. I know, I know, you must have garnered your skills of prognostication from those secret history books I can't find. How about we have a little discussion of why you think me and the rest of the board are racist. Would you care to declare the evidence that you feel leads you to this conclusion? I will take silence from you as an indicator that you have no evidence, but only choose to spout this nonsense for whatever unknown reason. If that becomes the case, then we and the rest of the board can discuss why we think you are filled with anguish and hate towards a particular race of people...with evidence provided.

What mood do you think Whites will be in? Your blatant stereotyping is obnoxious but expected.

I don't mind the personal jabs, as I have conceded to mimic them in the name of fair play. What I do find appalling is that he refuses to debate, then accuses us of not wanting to debate, and continually accuses us of not admitting facts that were never deliberated. I've had debates with children that are far more intelligent. The fact is that he has been exposed, and is too proud to concede, which has been demonstrated by his world view of "winning". It is just amazing that he has no concept on intelligent debate and the fact that the hole is getting deeper and deeper. At least his posts that are not full of misspelled words and undecipherable sentence structure. Too bad his thoughts are. And yes, to all of you wondering, yes I did use REBgp's post to mock BearEssentials97. I'm sure REBgp will shoot me a PM if he is offended, and I will have no problem with privately and/or publicly apologizing to him. As far as race mongers, not apology will be forthcoming, only more mocking. Maybe Yeoj will chime in with his pathetic solidarity posts, so we can gain more of an insight to his pathology before he runs like a frightened schoolgirl. I won't classify him with BearEssentails97 just yet, but time will tell.

I'm curious as to what would happen if you, BearEssentials97, ever ran into a true racist. I can see you asking him why he hates Black people, then I can see him asking you why you hate White people. Neither one of y'all will be able to answer other than "I'm an intolerant bigot that hates anyone that doesn't look like me". When y'all see y'all are identical in childish identity foolishness, maybe y'all will both realize that a thoughtful, congenial debate and analysis of misperceived stereotypes can lead to a breakdown of barriers built by race mongers to keep both sides feuding. Again, it's hard to type while laughing. Maybe this could happen, and it has in some cases, but I have a strong feeling that mental midgets will never concede to a debate. And thus, the animosity lives on. Let me know when you want to join a real conversation...otherwise I will just goad you into spewing your hate. So who would you like to start with? I suggested Sessions, but I'll let you pick. And forewarning, evidence is required in an adult debate.

Deflection with outright lies, and throwing in a little personal jab. You stick to the playbook. Do you believe you are a bigot? Do you hate White people? I can back up my claims. Do you think I'm racist as you alluded to? Can you backup your claims. Although I'm not a betting man, I would be willing to bet that you are not having near as much fun as I am. I love letting people express their true colors.

So is this why White Democrats think minorities are too inferior and incompetent to obtain an ID? Have you ever listened to a White Democrat explain why they feel voter IDs negatively impact minorities? Do you think these people are racist? I sure do. And to what party do they belong?

No, you have figments of imagination about racism running wild in your head. Please give your examples of the racists in the GOP so we can discuss and analyze the validity of your conclusions. You called me a racist and can't back it up, so I'm confident your illusions for the GOP are equally mythical. Please put the evidence in my face. (Man, it is hard typing when laughing.) Do you even have an ounce of a clue of how ridiculous you sound? Normally I would feel sorry for you, but I'm highly not found of race mongers who call me a racist. So yeah, I will keep poking you to continually show your ignorance. So again, show me some evidence of the racists that have infiltrated the GOP so we can have a debate (one your are sure to embarrass yourself even more). Is Jeff Sessions one of those people? If so, how about we concentrate on him so you can have a little focus. It's always good to give focus to the mentally challenged to perform menial tasks. Let's see if you can accomplish this simple task.

What facts have I denied? In pure Liberal fashion, your delusional fantasies steeped in hatred get in the way rational thinking. So again, what facts have I denied? Please show your true colors some more. I smell another deflection coming. Seriously, how can you not see how childish your posts are, when it is obvious to pretty much everyone?

Yes, your desperation to keep your bigotry under wraps is unbecoming, but very, very apparent. This is just too funny. Why do you refuse to debate your own links? After all, shouldn't a debate with a racist, White supremist, childish, idiotic, (I forgot all of the names you called me) person be an easy win? Are you so insecure in your own abilities that you can't debate the most basic tenants of your belief system with an inferior? So where does that place you on the intelligence scale? It's clear you avoid debate by deflecting to childish name calling because you know you can't defend your statements. It's all too typical of the Lefties these days. Them Liberals done gone and planted that playbook into your brain. At least we can get some entertainment value out of the deal. Please continue.

Self-realization of your own exposure is not your strong point is it? (Man, you can't get a more rhetorical question than that.) The laughter continues. It's a shame you can't share in it, since laughter is the best medicine for someone debilitated by hate. We know you have zero evidence to claim I'm a racist? Everyone knows it. It just proves that your motive for labeling someone a racist has nothing to do with their actions, but their color of skin and your feeble minded attitude. Do you feel superior to a White supremist? Do you think you share the same stunted and childish views that they express? Please keep exposing your hatred and bigotry by answering.

That "outright embrace of racism by the GOP" is a delusional fantasy ingrained in only the childish and sheepish of brains. How are you not embarrassed or shameless?

Scared? Yes you are scared. You are scared to defend your true feelings. You get mad because I have the audacity to challenge your insane ideas, and your go-to self-defense mechanism is to call me a racist. Please keep posting. Although you've exposed your blatant bigotry on here, I'm guessing there might be one or two that haven't caught on yet. And do you really adhere to those links you posted earlier? When reading the first one, I was aghast at how bad the "science" was, but what do you expect from a sociologist. Would you like to the discuss the garbage you tried to pass as science?

You keep wallowing in your hate, following race mongers with blind enthusiasm, and we'll keep laughing at you. If there was an alt-Left you would have to break your neck looking to the Right to find it. Your hate is blatant, undeniable, and very shameful, but for some reason I just can't keep from laughing at your posts. I know I shouldn't laugh, and I should feel empathy and sympathy, but I just can't muster those feelings when dealing with a hateful bigot who blindly and willfully displays childish emotions. I'll ask again, as you seem perturbed and willing to share your true feelings...do you think I'm racist?

Your undeniable bigotry and hate has made you a laughingstock of this board. The majority of decent people see that clear as a bell. Why can't you?

Russians posing as Chinese?

This "professor" thinks that Trump supporters will turn violent: [Hidden Content] Do universities require a stunted and absolute childish view of the world as a prerequisite for employment? Where do universities find these people? This "professor" needs to realize that it is her, and people like her, that Trump supporters abhor...people that throw out baseless and nonsensical accusations to label people. Her and her ilk are the reason Trump is the current president, and hopefully for another term. I would really like for her, or anyone, to explain the evidence that leads to her conclusion. I'm thinking the rationale for not providing evidence is that offering such means you have to defend it, and she knows she can't. So in good Liberal fashion, she just throws out baseless accusations then runs like a good little sheeple. I hope Carlson Tucker can convince her to appear on his show. I highly doubt he or anyone can bust through her air of superiority and self-attributed grandiose cognitive abilities, but at least he can expose her ridiculous claims on national TV. Oh yeah (almost forgot)...thoughts?

I'm not ate up with TDS so I'm not privileged with the fantastical delusions gleaned from innocuous behavior. Can you give some examples of this race-baiting behavior?

Liberals have desperately been trying to make this issue about race since it's inception. Anytime someones disagrees with a Liberal, it's because they are a racist, misogynist, homophobic, xenophobic deplorable. Same old song and dance. I'll wait for the imminent equivalency declaration now.