Englebert

What's "acts" do you/Liberals consider as a sign of desperation?

Only in your delusional world, which is abundantly clear to everyone. Why do you even try?

I like discussing ideas when people get on here and say things like "racist GOP lawmakers are being outed on a weekly basis", or "the attorney general is dismantling Civil Rights legislation", and claim/allude to everyone on here being racist. Yeah, I like calling out ignorant statements like that. Yes you should feel dumber, because your idiotic statements were highlighted for everyone to take notice. And that is a fact. I don't extend courtesy to race mongers. And you should leave this alone, the more you post, the more embarrassing it gets for you.

I agree.

That is weak...and embarrassing...for you. I knew you wouldn't want to discuss anything. You just like throwing out baseless accusations, calling White people racist, then resort to personal attacks when challenged. The signs of the mentally weak. Maybe one day you will grow up and realize you can't blame all of your personal faults on old angry White guys.

I cured cancer, therefore it is so. I can provide links that show research being done on Hodgkin's disease, common colds, hair loss, etc., therefore I've proved my point. Don't ask me again to prove I cured cancer, or I will just refer back to my links on other diseases. Now I'm copying your strategy. Frighteningly embarrassing isn't it.

Just more embarrassment. Would you like to delve deeper into the conclusions drawn by these links. If so (and I'm laughing), I will challenge you to provide evidence of my actions that fit the mold these "researchers" are suggesting. Would you like to be embarrassed even more? And why would you hint as something when you've been challenged to state it outright. It that typical of pedophilia behavior?

You call me and many racist, I call you on it, you can't defend it, and I'm the lost cause. The laughter in thunderous. We can all hear it. Can you? Do you enjoy embarrassing yourself?

So I should do the same and just refer to you as "that pedophile". Fair is fair right! And if you get perturbed when people start referring to you as a pedophile, we will just say you need professional help. Your childishness does not go unnoticed. Bless your little heart.

There's those wild assertions again. What question did you answer? You've attempted an answer for some, ran from others. Do you even know what a circular argument is? Do bother with an attempt to answer, it is perfectly clear to the point of being rhetorical. That was not my article. I posted the first link I could find from a source that was not considered Right wing. I didn't even read it, as I have already read the story from previous listed sources. And where did you say/allude I was using your argument strategy? I missed that point. I'm assuming your strategy is to post off-topic, senseless, and baseless statements in order to deflect, which is a far cry from what I'm doing. I also missed where you answered the question of backing up your claims that the attorney general, or anyone in the Trump administration is repealing Civil Rights legislation. You claim to have answered, but have you? Please point to that tidbit of information. I'm curious as to why you're "not going there"? You seem to have hinted that you think some of my points are steeped in racism. If you want to hint at something, why not just come out and say it when directly challenged? Is the reason you won't "go there" because you know I will immediately ask you to backup your claims, and you know you can't? Do you think I have a right to question when a person levies racist accusations, especially at myself? And if I do question the veracity of those claims, should I expect the accuser to get "worked up" for me having the audacity to question a serious charge?

What makes you think I'm "working myself up". Big Girl claimed that illegals can't vote as a response to a post. I posted the links, and basically said the same thing you did...that's it's a slippery slope. You jumped into the topic, then are trying to claim I'm worked up. Are you worked up? After all, we basically said the same thing, but since I don't follow the Liberal indoctrination, does that mean I get judged on a different paradigm? Please layout your rationale for your proclamation that the attorney general is dismantling Civil Rights. What actions have been taken, or even words spoken, that lead you to believe Civil Rights legislation is in jeopardy of being repealed, or that other legislation is being considered to counteract current law? Can you backup your claims? I have I feeling I know where this will go. Will you try the deflection ploy, the personal attack ploy, the victim ploy, or will you actually engage in a debate of your claims. And just for curiosity, do you think I'm racist?

You are comical, I will give you that. The ol' "I ain't got time for that" routine is a bit overplayed by now don't you think? I challenge you to pick one of your links, even though it was not part of the initial discussion, for further analysis. Run, Forest, run. California is giving aliens the right to vote. Just like a Liberal, I guess you refuse to acknowledge news that doesn't fit your agenda. Here you go: [Hidden Content] There are more links above that I'm sure you didn't read. San Francisco is allowing illegals to vote in local school board elections. Do you dispute this? Will you post a link from Politifact that says no illegals voted in the 2016 election as proof that this link is false. We already had one try this, let's see if we get two. And how many GOP politicians were exposed as racist this week? According to you, we should have had at least one. I know the answer...all of them. And what is that legislation that the GOP is putting together that will roll back Civil Rights? Have they given it a name yet? Will it be a cute name to disguise the sinister objective like the "Affordable Care Act"?

And I told you to pick one for further discussion. You ran like a frightened schoolgirl. The laughter is just booming all around you. Your sources were answers to questions not asked, and did nothing to further your wild exclamations. Your seemingly insistence that you somehow "proved" some point is just comical, then refusing to discuss your links made it just hysterical. How to you feel about Big Girl posting a link from Politifact about voting fraud from the 2016 election, when the topic was about California giving local voting rights to illegals? Sound familiar? Is this some sort of Liberal strategy to run from outlandish statements?

Man are you confused. I gave her information from multiple sources, and she still questioned the sources. You might want to get a better comprehension of the subject matter before commenting. And it is long standing practice that when you make an allegation, the burden is on you to back up your statements. It is abundantly clear that the Liberals have no clue of this concept. You might want to re-read that pedophile example, let it sink in, and then comment on backing up statements.

When have stats ever mattered to a Liberal? The better theory is that it's overwhelmingly plausible he doesn't know what that word means to use it in such an inappropriate fashion. The laughter continues, but empathy and sadness is gaining ground.

Run, little one, run...just like you've done in the past. If you feel up to backing up your claims, bring your best. But we all know you will run just like in the past. So what will the topic be for debate? Please pick one, preferably from BearEssentials97 post of links, for further discussion (since he ran like a frightened schoolgirl). You know, the ones you had the audacity to say I was schooled on. Oh wait...run, little one, run, just like you've done in the recent past. That laughter is thunderous ain't it. And please, please, oh please, point out the talking points I've thrown out from any news source. If you had two functioning brain cells, you would realize that when dealing with the likes of "you people" (just for you Dove), I provide a platform for you yourselves to dig your hole. So please, elaborate on your childish stereotypes. Although I would longingly anticipate a debate, I bet you won't...past history has proven this.

I think we found Bagdad Bob. I was wondering where that guy ran off to.

"Without including all of the factors". Hummmmm. If only more people would just heed this little nugget, instead of the ol' "I don't need no stinking evidence". If his analogy was a thrown basketball you would be in the hospital for a broken nose. The laughter continues.

We've had the privilege of witnessing your "expert" analysis on previous occasions, and we are still laughing. I can't believe you have the nerve to show up on here again after all of the "beatdowns" you have taken. Oh well, I'll never understand masochism.

Always trying to deflect. You said lawmakers were being exposed on a weekly basis as being racist. You will not prove that, you cannot prove that. Your links in no way shape or form prove any lawmakers being outed as racist as you claim, just a way for you to deflect. Your personal attacks are very comical, considering you are exhibiting your exact words to a tee. We can all see it, but for some reason "you are choosing to be stupid" or just...well, there is no "other". "Nothing else to discuss" should imply that something was previously discussed, but since you are too coward to do that, I guess you will just run.

Such condescension from an obviously stunted and challenged mentality. Priceless. That hole keeps getting deeper while the laughter (turning to empathy) continues. Run, run, run. Evidence: you said you answered my questions about the GOP. You said lawmakers were being outed as racist on a weekly basis. I asked you to name them, or name just one. You ran like a frightened schoolgirl. And then you have the nerve to falsely claim you answered...with the all too familiar air of Liberal superiority. Do you actually believe we can't see your disingenuous and childish actions. Your claim of answering some of my other questions was to post a plethora of links with no critique on your part. I asked you to pick one for discussion and you flatly refused. I'm guessing fear played a big part in that. I never asked you about the war on the drugs but somehow in your convoluted mixed up brain due to Liberal following you must have employed the typical stereotype ideology to claim I did. Thank God it's not your job to educate me...or anyone.

Delusional much? Don't worry, your ploy for the sympathy card is gaining traction. I'm really starting to feel sorry for you.

Again, for about the fifteenth time, choose one of your "facts" for debate, or forever endure that cluck, cluck, cluck going off in your head. I'm astonished you keep digger deeper in that hole of embarrassment you dug for yourself. Your obvious and childish attempts at deflection are just sad and simultaneously comical.

If it does pan out I'm sure we will hear the ol' "but Obama laid the groundwork" rhetoric just like we heard about the economy.

This is just hilarious. You try to denigrate me, accuse me of being a racist, accuse me of having no comprehension skills, call me an idiot, etc. for the mere audacity of challenging your wild assertions. All I have done in this whole "debate" (LOL) is to give you a pathway for your true colors to emerge...which was not much of a challenge. How are you not embarrassed? Maybe you will go back and read this thread, but I have a feeling you will just harbor the hate for someone who merely asks you to explain your own statements. I will take credit for laying the seeds that enticed you to spread your peacock feathers through reprehensible debating tactics, but I only followed in kind. Let me know when you discover the cojones to actually debate your articles. I have no doubt that conversation will be as entertaining as this one.