Englebert

I wholeheartedly admit I love it when you "come to play". Why would me or anyone deny that? You provide priceless comedic material. The rage and hate-filled illustrations of delusion provide many "oh wow, did he just really say that" moments. The sad part is you actually believe the garbage you espouse. What hole am I digging? The hole you keep falling in? Admit it. This isn't going well for you is it? Keep trying. The more you post, the more we get to laugh.

Do you not know how to read the person's name in the quote? And you want to call me an idiot. The second graders are laughing hysterically. And you do run. Every time someone asks you a pertinent question you try to defuse, deflect, obfuscate, but mainly ignore the question. Don't think we don't notice. And we are the idiots? Comedic gold. How does it feel to live in a world of denial?

So did Trump, but you accuse him of schmoozing. So let's recap. Obama imposed sanctions and kicked Russians out of the US. And you interpret that as being tough on Putin. Trump imposed tougher sanctions on Russian and kicked many more Russians out of the US. And you interpret that as Trump schmoozing with Putin. I guess it's hard to keep your facts straight when relying on the Liberal news to tell you how think. Did Obama kick the Russians out before or after he want dancing and to a ballgame with Castro?

Man, the Liberal press has done a number on you. You are comical...well, comical to us. It's like seeing a second grader calling his teacher an idiot. Keep trying. I will give you kudos. You didn't run like every other time. I'm not sure that was in your best interest though.

What did I deny? The more you run your mouth the dumber you sound. You call me a racist, but somehow I'm supposed to be the "bad guy" harboring racial resentment? That's childish logic, and just flat comical...and very insightful as to your cognitive abilities. I'm not sure if it's your hatred for Trump or just all non-Liberals (i.e. sane people), but your failure to recognize these shortcomings is simultaneously hilarious and sad. Now on to Trump...please give some examples of what you consider as capitulation to Putin by Trump. The Liberal media is making you look even more foolish, and I'm anxious to hear what you can parrot in a comical attempt of reasoning. Was it the ratcheting up of sanctions on Russia? Was the killing of Russian soldiers? Was it the ousting of Russian diplomats from the U.S.? Was it the bombing of Syria? Please enlighten us.

So in your eyes I will be mad if another "brotha" is elected president. I don't want you to call me a racist, I'm calling you out for actually doing it. But maybe I overestimated your comprehension abilities of your own statements. Maybe if you stay away from reprehensible stereotyping of White people then we can debate your obviously sophomoric contentions of Trump....which again, still won't go well for you. Considering your previous posts (yes, I will use them against you), why on Earth would you think I would be mad if a "brotha" was elected president? Please explain the contention of that statement. Maybe when you try to articulate your thoughts, that little light bulb will go off above your head. Just joking, you knew exactly what you meant when you made that statement. And so did we.

Can even you comprehend that statement? I can go low, but that's a little too low for baby talk. Care to translate? By the way, please...oh, please, try to use my posts against me. That would give us even more insight to your stunted mentality. Seriously, I'm anxious to read your comprehension and understanding of my posts. Fair warning...your attempts of comprehension will only lead to laughter, with a thunderous exclamation point. But please feel free to try. You did threaten to do it. Don't run...do it! And how about throwing that race card out again while your at it. We know that is your go-to show-stopper, unless...

Now that is deserving of the "thanks for the laugh". Do you hear the laughter? I knew you would run. You talk like you want a debate, but tuck tail as soon as challenged. I guess in your delusional intellectual prowess you really consider playing the typical race card as "throwing gasoline". How are you not ashamed at playing weak, asinine, predictable, and juvenile quips, then laughably insinuate you are intellectually superior. Again, the laughter is not directed with you...but by now you must know that. Keep trying, the entertainment value is priceless. (Now I feel like a true Liberal moron when I can escalate a pedestrian statement into the "priceless" category. Maybe I can aspire to the fake outrage category now.)

Much obliged. You provide loads of entertainment for us....and we are not laughing with you. Would you care to call me a racist again? I would love to debate you on your terms. The gutter is just where I live when dealing with the likes of perpetual victims masquerading as intellectuals. See, I can do it too...although I highly doubt you can figure out that line. But the rest of us can. Please don't run and hide like you normally do. This has all the expectations as a fun exercise in brainlessness...and entertainment (for some). I'm still laughing.

Did you forget your "brotha" smoozed up to Putin like a smitten schoolgirl. You brought no substance to this thread, only to inject race and smut. You must be proud (but embarrassed). You've displayed your comprehension skills on this forum on multiple occasions, so it is not surprising this topic is way beyond your skillset of discernment (well, lack of). And for your information, none of us care if another "brotha" is elected president, as long as that one is way more competent than the last one.

I totally agree. The longer he stays, the more times the Liberals show their true colors. They are even admitting they are communists now. Many straight out admit they are for total gun confiscation. Many admit to being anti-Christian. Many admit to hating White people. These people used to conceal their bigotry and hatred. Trump has somehow unleashed the bile within them. We couldn't even imagine a better display of the true evilness of Liberals. Yep, totally agree...never a dull moment with due to him.

If your source is Politifact you have no business being in an adult conversation. That is one of the worst publications on the planet. They are the very definition of "fake news". Do you think Obama would have dared killed Russian soldiers? Obama levied sanctions on Russia, Trump ramped them up even tougher. And I distinctly remember Obama chastising Mitt Romey saying "the cold war is over. The 80s called and wants their foreign policy back". Remember that? Do you remember Obama telling a Russian administrator that he would have more flexibility after the elections? Remember that? Do you remember Obama's red line? Do you remember Obama saying that we should restore relations with Russia. Trump does just that, and your response is that Trump is afraid of Putin. If your point has any iota of truth then you would see Trump capitulating to Putin...but the opposite has happened. He has been tougher on Putin that Obama ever was. So who again is/was afraid of Putin? I guess if Trump gave Putin an ipod preloaded with his speeches, or a fake reset button that said "overcharge", then that would be (in your eyes) tough on Putin. Your sources of information are not doing you any favors. And I noticed you just glossed over and failed to acknowledge the salient point of my post. Why the outrage now, but not then? "Then" being when Obama was in charge while Russian and Chinese hackers were stealing our military secrets, hacking every government agency, hacking voter rolls, etc. Yet Obama did absolutely nothing, and no outrage. The only thing different now is that Trump is in charge, so the level of accountability mysteriously changes. Again, why the outrage now but not then? We know the answer even though you won't admit it?

Exactly. It's hard to take any of these quacks seriously on anything since their blatant hypocrisy is on full display. If we had competent reporters/interviewers then these hacks would be forced to explain their selective outrage.

For different reasons. He said he told Putin "to cut it out". Oooooh, such tough talk. Why no outrage then? And why no outrage when Obama spent taxpayer money to meddle in the Israeli elections?

I find the reactions to Trump's meeting as very shameful, embarrassing, and hypocritical by everyone criticizing Trump...those who are screaming now but did not say one peep about Russian and Chinese hacking while Obama was in office. Nor did any of these critics cry outrage over Obama's meddling in the Israeli election. The fake outrage now, or even genuine outrage, is severely overplayed and comical. If these hacks are so outraged now, they should have been just as outraged during Obama's tenure.

I haven't been keeping up with the news lately, so forgive me if I missed this. A judge has ordered ICE to re-unite kids with their parents that have been arrested for crossing the border illegally. As little as I know about this issue, my understanding was that illegal border crossers will be arrested. Any minor illegally crossing the border will also be detained, but cannot be incarcerated in an adult detention center...thus separation of kids from parents. Now I hear that a judge has ordered ICE to reunite the families. In what little I know, this judgement seems to be in violation of federal law. My question to the law scholars out here is what authority does this judge have to make a ruling that defies federal law. Again, I have not kept up with this issue and the judgement could be perfectly okay, but is contrary to my rudimentary understanding of the law. Wil someone please explain?

I have a question: currently, as the laws stand now, can charges of aiding and abetting be brought against someone harboring illegal aliens? If Diane Black's bill proposal becomes law, and illegal presence in the U.S. becomes a felony, can charges of aiding and abetting be brought then? I have no idea on either question. Does someone out there know precisely the current law and potential law on this?

I highly doubt this proposed bill makes it to the floor. Neither McConnell nor Ryan wants to expose the Republicans who would vote against it. Hopefully the bill does make it to a vote so we can see who needs to be ousted from Congress.

I would love to see McAuliffe interviewed by a competent reporter/interviewer who makes him explain how he can come to the conclusion that Kavanaugh "will threaten the lives of millions of Americans". I recall a few Liberal posters on here mocking how Republicans use scare tactics. There is no equivalency when it comes to scare tactics used by Democrats. The Liberals posters that made those accusations should be well aware by now that the "both sides do it" tactic is akin to a basketball team winning 126-7, but try to say "well both teams scored". There is no excuse for not being awake now.

You should be used to "news" outlets running stories without credible sources or multiple confirmations. The Liberal news outlets do it all the time...on a daily basis...as routine "journalism". If this type of reporting kills you, you must have died thousands of times already. How many lives do you have? I find it perplexingly funny that you are quick to point out the lack of confirmations of this story, but are suspiciously silent on all the stories ran by CNN, MSNBC, NBC, etc. that rely entirely on anonymous sources. This article clearly stated the source, and put all of the weight of legitimacy on that source. And yet, you seem perfectly fine when other news organizations use unnamed source(s). I guess it just depends on the publisher on what you deem credible...multiple credible sources a must for one, anonymous source(s) okay for others. That revelation almost killed me. I do find this story lacking in credibility due to zero supporting evidence, and will give it no further thought until if/when credible evidence emerges. And I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for anyone to dig deeper...especially the Liberal outlets. I find it amusing that the Obama administration and many Liberal outlets have decried it's inauthenticity. Based on their track record, they would be better off keeping their mouth shut than show their hypocrisy within.

Sheets are ancient...hoodies are the new "sheets".

Trump proved them all wrong. But you won't give him credit will you. And it is hilarious that you would fall for the old worn out tiresome line that Fox News lies when all of the other major news organizations have been caught in a plethora of lies and unethical practices. It's hypocritical to call out hypocrisy when the caller is a hypocrite.

If a Congressman would have encouraged GOP supporters to ambush Obama or Clinton administrators in restaurants, gas stations, etc., they would have been censored and had expulsion proceedings drawn up before that person had ever finished their sentence. The Liberal media would become even more radical in spewing their bile against Republicans. It seems Liberals are the only ones that have a right to be angry (even though the anger is based on nothing). Frankly I hope these Liberal nutbags and Hollywood weirdos keep up their antics. Hopefully their actions will draw sane people to the polls. My question to Liberals is: Should any of these nutcases that encourage this type of behavior, or anyone that participates in this type of behavior be stripped of their second amendment rights?

A diagnosis I shall take to heart. Thanks for the chuckle this morning. "Seeing no benefit" is probably the smartest thing you stated on this board...ever. The more you talk, the more absurd you sound. So yeah, running is beneficial for you.

What does this mean? Are you trying to convey a secret message that you can run from when called out? If you quote me, state your point, otherwise run like normal.