Englebert

Spoken like a true sheeple. You can't back up any of that garbage you just spouted. I can back up my statements. Would you care to continue this or will you run like brain-washed subservient that you are? I know the answer.

What do you mean do I? I am the one that explained it to you when you had no clue. In fact, you kept asking which one was more important, which caused cautious laughter all over this board (after all, it's not nice to laugh at the mentally challenged). You claim to have multiple degrees, but I don't trust a single thing you say. You can only point to a piece of paper as legitimacy because you can't understand the material. So no, you don't have the mental capacity to judge him, or any other person with more than 2 functioning brain cells. Your blind reliance with complete lack of understanding of Liberal talking points proves that beyond a shadow of a doubt.

I bet he knows the difference between debt and deficit. So what makes you think you have the capacity to judge? Oh right, you are an enlightened Liberal. Do you feel the laughter? (Sorry for butting in Nash, but I just kept laughing at her assertion. I pictured a spoiled little 2nd grader calling her college educated teacher stupid when I read her post.)

You seem to quote almost verbatim Liberal talking points, then run like a frightened schoolgirl when your responses are called out for their flaws. I can't for the life of me understand how you cannot understand you are being played a fool by the Democratic party. When I and others point that out, you say you don't have to prove anything and run. Nowhere near what a critical free-thinker would do. Your self description is nowhere near congruent with the actual ideas you perpetuate. And I never demanded you prove anything. Your inability to prove your points does not go unnoticed by everyone reading this. Whining about not having to prove your asinine statements is just comical.

The narrative did not change. Everybody knows the numbers are not an accurate reflection of real unemployment. Using the same flawed formula to compare Obama numbers with Trump numbers is the only way to compare apples to apples. Incessant stereotyping and regurgitation of Liberal talking points is not a very good indicator of a free thinker.

Can you name any policies that Obama enacted that led to the decrease in unemployment? I, stevenash, and others can name plenty of Trump/GOP Congress policies that contribute to this fact. Did Obama contribute to the decrease in unemployment of hinder the natural recovery?

Can you or the author back up the headline in that link. Please give an example of Trump or any White person thinking only Blacks are on welfare. There are roughly 230 million Whites and roughly 42 million Blacks in the United States. Find the demographic numbers of people on food stamps/government assistance then figure up what percentage of their own demographic is dependent. But you will still rely on the misleading falsehoods to lead you by the nose. You are the epitome of the false narratives PAMFAM10 laid out in his earlier post. You hate stereotypes but are the first to scream them...and believe them.

That's a lie in itself. I've heard over and over and over the talking points you laid out. I'm not basing my retort on your post alone. And falling for these Liberal talking points does not bold well for your assertion that you are a free thinker.

What you listed are lies and stereotypes perpetuated by the Democratic party, but Blacks will still vote in full force for that party. I can go down your list with you if you would like, but I'm highly confident you don't want to go down that road.

I didn't realize that the authors and contributors to all of the Black/minority urban outreach programs/organizations are racist White bigots. I thought these Democrats were sincere but misguided in their efforts to throw money at the underprivileged in a effort to lend a helping hand. Now I see that they are just captors and overlords of the minority demographic...who can absolutely count on the Black vote to keep them in power.

What policies do you think need to be changed? Which policies of Republicans turn off the Black voter, and why?

If "parents" purposefully and willfully put themselves and their children in a situation that might require them to be separated if caught, somehow you want to blame the law enforcer instead of laying blame squarely on the shoulders of where it belongs...the parents. I don't find it "harsh" at all to separate them. In fact, I would encourage the practice as a deterrent to those who seek to invade our country. I would put billboards all along the border stating: "Invade our country...lose your kids!". And the definition of "centrist" or "Left leaning" varies wildly depending of the leanings of the person doing the defining.

How or where do you propose we house (detain) these lawbreakers until we can deport them? Should we stick with the catch and release program, in which the vast majority never bother to show up for their court hearings? Should a 30 year old father of three who illegally immigrates to our country be given preferential treatment over an illegal single 30 year old man? And again, should these illegals face repercussions for their flaunting of our laws? How about for repeated violations?

They are separated because the law says for the adults to be placed in a detention center. The law also says that minors cannot be placed in these same detention centers. Therefore, they are separated. We can change the law. I don't recall anyone arguing against that. And I would have no problem with concentration camps. But like a good Liberal in training, I would choose to change the name to a less harsher connotation, like "tent city" or "undocumented palace of enchantment". And if all we did was deport them, what incentive do illegals have to not just come back over the border. Do you think there should be punishment for illegally entering the U.S.? One time? Twice? 15 times?

There is a very simple solution to having your kids taken from you at the border. DO NOT CROSS THE BORDER ILLEGALLY. Problem solved. I really don't get why so many people misplace blame in situations like this. If a mom is caught shoplifting or writing bad checks, should we not arrest her if she has kids. Can no mother, nor father, be incarcerated if they have kids. The illegals choose to put their kids in a situation where they might be separated. I for one will NOT blame ICE/officers for enforcement of our laws.

I'm hoping the Mueller investigation keeps going. The longer it goes, the more corruption we find out about. Mueller's investigation has done wonders in exposing the hate-filled Liberals embedded in our top government positions. How many FBI/DOJ agents have been fired, demoted, or forced to resign? [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] And I'm highly confident there are more that haven't been exposed yet. And how many people have been indicted due to "collusion" with the Russians? Well that would be a big fat zero.

Wow, the Liberal wing-nut media has sure did a number on you.

And the one that clears the path for Iran to eventually possess nuclear weapons? I hope you realize there are other (and much better) sources of information besides the loony Left wing-nut outlets. I'm fairly confident that you don't frequent any other sources due to your incessant parroting of those propaganda machines.

Again, please give your rationale for making this asinine statement. I bet you won't...because when you start typing the response you will realize how pathetic your statement really was. Do you really enjoy trying to pigeonhole (stereotype) everyone? I thought you people (Liberals...clarification for Dove since I know his head was about to explode) hated stereotyping people. I can't remember who originally made this statement so I can't give them credit, but I'll use it anyway. When a Liberal starts screaming about some bad action, you can bet he is the one guilty of it.

Is this another example of your blinding, debilitating hate or can you enlighten us on the rationale of your expert diagnosis? I'm very anxious to diagnose your diagnosis. Sorry that the sarcasm is so obvious, but I'm tired and don't feel like sugar-coating the bait.

The military capabilities of each is something we know absolutely nothing about. But they know, which is probably why Kim cowered.

Can't answer what? What question do you think I can't or won't answer? Delirious much? And you still won't answer the question I posed (and double dogged dared you to answer). I swear, it's almost like "debating" a six year old.

My opinion is that we got here because Trump bowed up to a wanna-be bully and Kim cowered. More clearly, Kim is convinced that Trump is someone serious that will back up his talk. I'm in total agreement with you about being cautiously optimistic. I'm very cautious, but very hopeful. I would not be surprised at all if talks fall through. I'm still not convinced that Kim is not playing the historical worn out game, but I'm fairly confident Trump will not get played like all of the others. (And I mean "fairly" in the weakest way possible.) Trump is a businessman and is used to games like this, but the allure of notoriety can corrupt the best of them. I think Kim's decision will be predicated on how he perceives the strength and conviction of his allies/protectors, mainly China.

Plagiarize much? Do you find it thrilling to copy a lunatic ate up with TDS? What debate are you starting? Cut and paste is not a debate. Please pick any part of that rant to debate. I'll see you when you post it.

ESPN has just corrected themselves...shocking for a Liberal station. (My apologies, been on the Political forum and forgot to change modes.) Texas will play Arkansas and Texas Tech will play the winner of Florida/Auburn.