Jump to content

Englebert

Members
  • Posts

    5,365
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Englebert

  1. Just saw where ESPN is showing Texas versus Texas Tech on Sunday at 1:00 in the opening round of the CWS. I've seen on multiple previous matchups that Texas would play Arkansas and Texas Tech would play the winner of Fla/Aub. Do you have any other info?
  2. You are going to do what you do best...run like a frightened schoolgirl. I laid down the challenge, but somehow you "ain't got time for that". Do you actually think you are being attacked by a gang of "trolls" when it is just me? Who are my accomplices? And please inform me of the next meeting. I've seemed to have missed the last...well, all of them. Do you actually think anyone can understand that rant? Who brought up money? Oh wait, that was you. And apparently a troll is anyone that questions the spaceball fruity-loops attacks that you throw out. Serious question, how are you not embarrassed right now? Did the high dollar cigars fry your brain? Was it the cognac? Was it the waves lapping against your deck? Was it the skunkweed? (It's easy following the immature rants of a baiter. It's almost like "I know you are but what am I"). Do you want to elevate this conversation or stay in the gutter? I'm fine either way, but I'm not sure you have the capacity for escalation. Even though I'm fully confident this will be in vein, I'll try again. Why do you feel Trump is a racist POS? If you fail to answer you are a yellow belly chicken liver lover. You've been served. I hear John Denver playing in the background.
  3. I'll even expand on the bet. Folks on here like baddog, REBgp, stevenash, LumRaiderFan, BS Wildcats, 77, bullets13, TxHoops, PhatMack19, WOSGrad, AggiesAreWe, Reagan, jv_coach (forgive me...top of my head list...and yes, Txhoops is included along with Westend1 imo) and plenty of others would love nothing more than to have rationale debates on this forum. But somehow we always have to endure the trash, gutter snipe from Liberal (not Democrat) sycophants like you who see the world in black and white (skin color) and resort to deflection/personal attacks versus any serious debate. I don't know if you and your ilks have an inferiority complex or just follow the engrained Socialist handbook. But unlike the above mentioned posters, I have no qualms about going in the gutter...if only to expose the bile oozing from your pours. Can you feel the thunder of laughter all around you? Can you? I'll make a deal with you. I'll refrain from personal attacks in an attempt to get you to debate the propositions you have expounded on this thread. It would be easy to insult your intelligence, but history has shown this will only make you run. So let's agree on a rationale, civil debate on your contentions. What do you say? Please, please, please agree to a civil discussion. I really don't like embarrassing you, and it must get really frustrating for you considering you can't match wits with someone you consider your inferior. (And I'm an amateur, which makes you...) I'll start with a simple one. Why do you feel Trump is a racist POS?
  4. And running. I'm continuingly laughing. Run, run, run. Anything to avoid a debate. Embarrassed much?
  5. Stereotype much? I though you Liberals hated that. Would you care to guess how much I make? Do you think it is as much as Nancy Pelosi? And if the best revenge is living well, how do you feel about Trump's wealth? Hypocrite much? And how did I know that you would pull the ol' "I ain't got time for that" routine. I could buy all of your cigars if I would have made that bet. Problem is, I couldn't have gotten any takers. Do you actually feel confident or even competent in this "discussion". I'm not even good at it, but have a grin from ear to ear anticipating an attempt at a retort. Let's make another prediction...you will run like a frightened schoolgirl from an amateur debater. Anyone care to make that bet?
  6. Your the comedian. (Oops, that sounded like the ol' "I know you are but what am I" gag. But I'll sink down with you in the gutter. You might live there, but I don't mind visiting from time to time.) I'm shocked you have the audacity to reply, but not surprised you will not debate. Pedophile! (Oh please, oh please ask me for proof of that last dig.)
  7. Even though I'm not a betting man, I would be willing to bet a large sum of money that a Big12 or SEC team will be in the finals. LOL. I wish the CWS would flip the second round losers bracket like the women's do. From what I understand, Texas will play the winner of Arkansas/S. Carolina while Texas Tech will play the winner of Florida/Auburn in the first round.
  8. Wow. Thanks for the entertaining rant. There is so much wrong in your hate-filled diatribe that I don't know where to start. Let's just be content with the notion that "most, if not all, are laughing at you, not with you." If you want to debate any of your asinine contentions, I'm more than ready. But this song and dance has been played out before...with you claiming you ain't got time for that. So I'll just continue laughing but at the same time feel sorry that people like you actually vote for our representatives. I'll continue cashing my bigger paychecks while congratulating my neighbors for cashing theirs, while you stew in the bile and audacity of prosperity.
  9. You know, on second thought, maybe the aliens are much more like us than expected. Maybe they are capable of superior technological advancement, but get derailed and overwhelmed by phony, whiny, dependent, intolerant sycophants (i.e. liberal aliens) who destroy the world through their short-sighted, immoral, and detrimental policies in the worship of political correctness. Hmmm.
  10. I was thinking the same thing. Aliens have/had the knowledge and technology to develop space craft to travel to and populate other worlds...years and years beyond our technology. But somehow, these advanced people cannot foresee something that our challenged "scientists" can somehow observe, measure, and state as gospel. Your statement was clear as a bell, I just felt the need to explain it further to our "Man Made Global Warming Theorists" who deride any challenge to their assumptions.
  11. Here you go REBgp: [Hidden Content] Be warned though, this article is not worth wasting even 2 seconds of your life...other than the minimal entertainment value. The only thing that can be learned from this article is "how can so many nut-cases obtain college professorship jobs?" Do these people become social outcasts by avoiding anyone who will dare ask for validation of their theories?
  12. Will the judges be required to take training classes on inherent "beauty bias"?
  13. I have a feeling California's travel ban will be treated just like they treat immigration law...ignore it. I'm to the point of advocating for the wall to be built along the California border with Arizona and Utah instead of the Mexican border. Can we build both?
  14. It does get boring illustrating examples of Leftist hypocrisy over and over and over and over and over and over... and over and over and over and over....and over again.
  15. Maybe we should all adopt your "blind and run" attitude anytime we see overt examples of racism and/or bigotry. How do you think that strategy would work out for you?
  16. Some organizations separate the purchaser and financial secretary/treasurer permissions. That is, the financial secretary/treasurer has access to the bank statements, receipts, etc. but is not allowed to make purchases. The purchaser can spend the money, but does not have access to the paper trail. This setup allows the purchaser to make purchases without anyone else being present, but also ensures that same person can't hide these purchases. Of course, if the parties are in cahoots, then...
  17. Texas and Texas Tech awarded as host sights. I thought one or the other would receive a bid, but didn't think both would.
  18. The Big12 will get at least 3 teams in, provided Tech doesn't win the tourney. Texas, Texas Tech, and tourney champion (automatic bid) are all guarantees.
  19. For protection against aforementioned problems. Do you really want to inject your wing-nut, glutted diaper, whiny, un-American Liberal policies into this topic?
  20. That's like saying Telly Savalas had a head full of hair. Or like saying Too Tall Jones was a short man. Or Mama Cass was too skinny. Or James Harden has a clean shaven face. Or Hitler was a great man (ooops, Farrakhan actually did say that.)
  21. George Will is in need of a safe space filled with Play-doh and puppies. That's where one goes when placing heavy emphasis on cherry-picked criteria to further a false narrative. The exposure of true colors continues. And no, I'm not yet tired of winning. Keep it up Trump and Pence, and please accelerate the pace of MAGA. The Liberals hate America so much they can't even celebrate when American captors are rescued...all due to the ideology of the rescuers. All they can do is whine and deflect to personal attacks to prevent acknowledgement of accomplishments. I'm sure the Liberals are hurriedly strategizing on how to give Obama credit for Kim Jong-un's release of the American captors, and naturally concoct new personal attacks on any Conservative. You can focus on a sad, bitter little man's hateful rhetoric. Me, I'll celebrate the many accomplishments of the Trump administration. It's been a long time since I've had anything to celebrate in the political theater (sans the last year of course).
  22. Considering the phrase, men are from Mars, women are from Venus, it seems maybe that woman contribute more to "Climate Change" than men: [Hidden Content] Seriously though, according to all reputable sources, the "Climate Change" debate has been over for a long time, even as more and more controvertible evidence emerges. We haven't even scratched the surface yet of understanding Earth's climate, and this is just another example of that fact. The Man-Made Global Warming theorists (science deniers) will undoubtedly shrug this off as fake news...and will continue to heave barbs and name-calling at those of us who find it interesting and baffling as to why such an abundance of theories get little to no attention if Man is not the main culprit. I did find it comical that the last paragraphs had to throw in the very, very unsubstantiated caveat that Man is still the culprit...while providing zero supporting evidence. I guess the author was trying to save his job or stave off death threats.
  23. I'm curious to know if you used this particular type of retort when responding to Obama's many, many, many actions that were evoked when he was in a position of power. The whole idea of a person being a bully versus a person acting in good faith is one hundred percent subjective, even to a child. For you to try the worn out and condescending ploy of the Webster definition puts you squarely in the realm of childishness. But that's to be expected from a narrow-minded bigot incapable of 6th+ grade thought. Dumbing down a conversation is the only way you can participate. Since you consider the 2nd amendment subject to restrictions (gleaned from other posts) for people incapable of exercising that right, shouldn't we be just as or even more cognizant of those incapable of exercising the 1st amendment. Please, please, please give your best answer. I have a Webster's definition waiting for your reply. And I'm shocked that you dare resurrect you pathetic posts after practically all of your previous posts have been proven to be 100% inaccurate. And that percentage is being nice. But please keep posting so we have some entertainment value. Sorry to be so blunt, but your posts scream for professional help.
  24. Do you actually believe that we can't see your avoidance of the question? The childish deflection is just comical. So let's try this again. What controversial views are you alluding to? Are you actually stating that worshipping on Sunday is a controvertible view in America? Please tell me you have something else. And please, please, please tell me you can back up your statements at least on this one. You are o'fer so far. Please get on the scoreboard and give us a cogent defense of your "controversial" statements.
  25. And somehow you equate that to racism. Wow. Double wow. Why won't you admit your problem, and quit trying to cover it up by saying (laughably mind you) that the problem lies with us? You made a race allegation, cannot back it up, then try to deflect by attacking others. Classic Liberalism. Too bad we've caught on to the tactic. Try that first step. It might unleash all the hate you have bottled up inside and free your mind to see reality. There is an old saying that is very relevant here: When you find yourself in a hole, quit digging. Frankly, I don't want you to heed that advice. I want you to keep digging/posting for the off chance someone hasn't realized the extent of your hate, you will leave no doubt. I doubt if there is anyone left, so maybe just for our entertainment value.
×
×
  • Create New...