Englebert

Translation: uh huh.

Your earlier post contained zero evidence of man's involvement in changing temperatures. You posted a lot of links claiming that Earth's temperatures are changing, then basically said you have to be a moron not to believe Man was the cause. The post was so trite and full of untruths, half-truths, and far-out "assumptions" that I actually forgot about it. Again, it showed zero evidence of man's contribution, which is exactly what I referenced as the main point of focus. Your post also showed zero empirical evidence of the effects of Earth's ever changing temperatures...just of lot of conjecture from ones with zero credibility on the subject. In fact, nowhere in your post did anything address what is probably the main cause of Earth's temperatures...solar involvement, moon's variations in gravitational tug, variations in Earth's orbit, and/or Earth's uneven wobbles along its axis. No person with any sense of dignity would conclude that Man is the source of ever changing climate without including/discounting these factors in their research. And no one worth their salt should fall victim to those who discount these factors.

Is it back to okay to throw out negative stereotypes...or is it just reserved for minorities? If we open it back up to all people to freely throw out disparaging and baseless stereotypes, this board might get real interesting real fast.

The posts that agree with the Global Warming Nazis scream "I do not follow science. I don't need no stinking evidence to convict Man of killing Earth." Those are the hilarious ones. Tell me again about the evidence pointing to man as the main contributor to changes in Earth's weather. Oh yeah, there is none.

How does it feel to have a non-Liberal hijack the Liberal tactics and use them against you? The Liberals have become so accustomed to non-Liberals retreating or acquiescing to Liberal strong-arm tactics that it must be a major shock to stumble upon one that retaliates in like manner. The return must have been so shocking you seem to be imploring a physical engagement over a little message board. You must be proud. Can you hear the laughter? I heard that the Liberals had some kind of group pow wow to scream at the sky. Maybe you should try it. It might release some of that pent up anger you reserve for White people and enable you to see what most already know.

Wow, you are getting worse. I was hoping your interpretation skills would get better but I see you are blinded by hate. You make sweeping grotesque statements then accuse me of picking a fight. Third graders are laughing at you. You call the majority of White people racist then accuse me of calling you names. Second graders are laughing at you. I'm sure the kindergartners are as well. Everyone can see your hatred is the driving force of you pathetic interpretations. Let's take just one. Please explain how anyone can interpret Trump stating that the Mexican government is sending their criminals to the U.S. a racist statement. Just because you erroneously think that is a racist statement, doesn't mean the rest of the thinking world has to bow to your elementary thought processes. And I called you a pedophile in retaliation to you calling White people racist. It was an analogy to show that playing the Liberal game of baseless allegations can also be used in like manner against you. I see that it worked, but did you learn? I really doubt it. I will go out on a limb and guess you will continue to employ the same pathetic tactic. And what is a chicken... move is calling the majority of White people racist. Do you feel like a big man typing that crap on a message board. I wrote an obvious (to most people) analogy, and it laughingly sent you into a fighting rage. I guess the hatred is bubbling so close to the surface that you can be set off by your own comprehension inadequacies from a message board. What a life you must lead. I really don't know whether to feel sorry for you or continue laughing at your ridiculous posts. Your revelations are astonishing, but typical of Liberal sheeple. So again, what percentage of White people do you think are racist?

I have no idea what you mean in that first sentence. Please clarify so I can show your flaws again. You have succeeded in showing you lack of interpretation skills and reliance on the twisted Liberal spin doctors to tell you how you should think. That is clearly evident. And it is funny that you think I have a "sad little life" while spewing nonsensical vile. Harboring the amount of hate that you've shown must make one miserable. Do you think this board will be better off with or without your hate-filled rants?

Your comprehension skills need a lot a work. I did not say all White people are racist like you claim. I said I was assuming you are implying most White people are racist because you stated that the GOP and Democrats are full of racists. And I noticed you did not deny my assumption. So what percentage of White people do you think are racist? Your intepretation of "Mexico sends us their worst they're murderers they're rapists they're drug dealers...." as being a racist statement is just laughable. This statement says that the Mexican government is actively or passively encouraging their murderers, rapists and drug dealers to leave Mexico by going to the U.S. Let the U.S. deal with them instead of us. Whether the statement is an accurate or inaccurate analysis of the current immigration, in what warped sense is that racist? I've heard many pundits make this claim, and it always makes me chuckle. Have you even given any thought to this? Did you just hear the word Mexico and just assume it had to be a racist statement? "There were good people on both sides." Please show me the racism. I will save you the headache, there is none in that statement. How do you interpret racism out of this. Please, enlighten us. You might want to look up the definition of racism before answering. "Calling for the execution of the Central Park 5 even though they were innocent." When Trump made that statement, they were convicted rapists. And how is this racist? Has Trump ever indicated that he thinks only Blacks and Hispanic rapists should get the death penalty. Again, please enlighten us as to how this is racist. "Being sued by the federal government for housing discrimination numerous times." Read this: [Hidden Content] Do you have anything else? Roy Moore: He made the statement that considering all things, times were better when the family was strong. I'm guessing he was trying to emphasize the importance of family, which was so much stronger in our history than it is today. I can see why his downplaying the importance of slavery can be interpreted as racist. Can you be consistent though. Are you just as outraged at people that buy, sell, and hold slaves today? And Moore tried to clarify his statement when questioned later: [Hidden Content] My interpretation of his statement is that our country is strongest when the family is strong, in spite of our other flaws. But his downplaying of slavery is disturbing. I would like to ask him "Would you want this country to go back to strong family values if it also meant returning to slavery?" "He also refers to Asians as yellows and native Americans as reds." Wow. You have to be really going out of your way for that interpretation. See Occam's razor. Read this: [Hidden Content] You might want to refrain from your threats also. You will disappear from this site fairly quickly. I find it ironic that you hurl pathetic negative stereotypes, accuse me of being mad for the audacity of calling you out, then threaten me. I know, I know, me and the Republican bullies on this board will still be accused of running off another compassionate and enlightened poster. Same ol, same ol. At least we can all agree that Trump's election win has clearly shown which side harbors all of the hate.

Again, no reason or examples why you think most politicians (and I'm assuming most White people) are racist. Why do you refuse to answer a simple question? You make an accusation then refuse to back it up. How about this: you are a pedophile. I don't need evidence or proof of my contention. I will just state it as fact. And how about I just keep stating it over and over. Eventually some will start believing it. How about that dog whistle. Thankfully social mores and decency combined with a sense of self-worth prevent people from baseless accusations, or a least dictate that a person indicates what led them to such beliefs. I see that is lost on you. Keep throwing out the race card and I will keep throwing out the pedophile card. Deal?

Only in your Liberal fed diseased mind can you possibly think you have answered my questions. You gave no examples of racist acts or speech, but somehow conclude that you've satisfactorily provided some non-existence proof. Only in the mind of a Liberal does that qualify as evidence. What is disheartening is that I have come to expect nothing more when calling out the "dog whistlers". You can't defend your own statements, and I have a sinking feeling that you will just keep on parroting your Liberal Gods like a good little sheeple. I know this is futile, but I will try again. What evidence do you have that the GOP and Democrats are full of racist people? Please give examples that led you to this conclusion. Why haven't Civil Rights legislation been repealed, considering your claim that both parties are full of racists? I'm guessing you will refuse to offer such evidence because you know that your flawed thought processes will be exposed, and better yet, critiqued. Do we have anybody from the Liberal camp who will defend their provocative and outlandish statements? Please, someone step up and defend yourself.

Please give some examples of why you conclude that the GOP embraces racism. Name names and give examples of these acts. I bet you can't. I bet you just make sweeping negative allegations with no supporting evidence...negative stereotyping...a practice which I'm betting you claim to abhor. If both parties are racist, why in the world would they allow Civil Rights legislation to be proposed, much less passed? And if so much racism exists, why hasn't Civil Rights legislation been repealed? I'm assuming you are trying to refute the assertation that Blacks vote in a uniform way, i.e. monolithic. When a group continually votes for one party at around a 90% rate, I feel comfortable in describing that as monolithic. This does not mean that everyone in the group has the same reason for voting the way they do, but simply the group casts a vote the same way. I'm not sure why you would try to deny that when voting pattern research bears that out. And it is not being used in a derogatory manner, unlike your statements.

Fake news! Fake news! Fake news! It doesn't matter what I say, that's what will be interpreted by some on the Liberal side. But since it was you that brought it up, I'm willing to discuss it. He should be treated like any other person accused of sexual harrassment. He should not be given the Clinton treatment. (And since he is a "pubie", I'm sure he will not.) I am not enamored with any "congressional" investigation or committee. It took 27 investigations for Congress to discover Hillary was using a private email server. I don't know if that was a case of gross incompetence or covering for colleagues, but either way, I have absolutely zero trust in any investigation that is prefaced with "congressional". His fate will not be determined by his guilt or innocence, rather by the political whim of his colleagues. And on a related topic...I couldn't help literally laughing out loud when I heard Al Franken whining that he was being ousted while Trump and Moore were not. That cute little word immediately came to mind. Franken is actually trying to paint himself as a victim by pointing to other's behavior. Isn't that just classy classic.

Yeah, but I was able to get in a shot at Bill and Global Warming Nazis in a discussion about a Republican without getting off topic, and without the cute little word thrown at me.

What do you mean I'm better than that...exposing BS is what I do. That's like dragging a $100 bill through a trailer park and expecting no one to move a muscle. (I think I recently heard a similar analogy. I think it was dealing with Wild Bill Clinton. Listening to Liberals talk about Roy Moore always leads me to think about ol' Bill.) Am I to assume that your stance on Man-Made Global Warming is just the same BS? After all, both issues have the same amount of supporting evidence that is easily put into question from any novice that actually looks at said evidence.

If you were a juror, would you convict Moore based on the evidence before you? I find it very, very, very difficult to believe that someone in your line of work would fall victim to such blatant manipulation that is readily refuted by even the novice of novices. Let me ask the question another way, if Moore was your client, do you think he would be convicted? Could you muster a convincing defense against such scant and problematic evidence? I think even I could defend someone in his position (with absolutely no formal training).

I doubt that the UIL would put LaMarque in that district. LaMarque would basically have to drive through Dist11 to get to Dist12. I would switch Hamshire-Fannett and Huntington. But I'm thinking along the same lines that the UIL might split the old Dist12 in similar fashion. It might be just wishful thinking on my part though.

What other Houston schools have 4A DII numbers? Do you know if Kashmere elected to play up?

Orangefield dropped to 3A-DI.

I'm thinking there might be a possibility of the old 12-4AII being split up. I haven't looked at all of the teams that closely, but Tarkington, LaMarque, Houston Kashmere, Jasper and Huntington all need a district. The UIL might make a district with: Houston Kashmere LaMarque Hardin-Jefferson Liberty Hamshire-Fannett Tarkington and another district with: Silsbee Jasper West Orange-Stark Huntington Rusk ??? (East Texas team) One thing I learned over the years is that I have no idea what to expect when guessing district placement.

Please restate in English, or something comprehensible. And TxHoops has a little word that describes your posts. I'll wait for him to unleash it on you.

I agree. You have nothing.

This is like a kindergartner saying his teacher is ignorant. Or like a 3rd grader walking into a Mensa meeting and shouting "You are all ignorant". Thanks for the laugh.

Don't know what? I do know that you've ignored my previous questions.

Did you just ignore two questions I posed to you, then ask me an off-topic question? What is wrong with you? I'll pose another question. Is this board better off with or without your contributions?

You have a history of telling unsubstantiated non-truths. So when you disparage someone, one can safely assume the opposite is probably true. I was not a Trump fan at all, to be point of contempt for him. But since I've seen his ability to bring out the true colors of the hateful Liberals, I'm liking him more and more. Go Trump!