Englebert

You posted right after the link was posted. The link was right there. All you had to do is click on it. Oops, then you would have had to read it. That seems to be a bit too much work for Liberals. Just let the Liberal gods spin the topics and spoon feed them to y'all. And that link was from snopes.com, which is not in any stretch of the imagination a Righty website.

And do you have any evidence that they won't? You are on a roll today. How does that Burger King crown fit you?

Why are you asking personal questions? Does it matter? Are you seriously attempting a stereotyping ploy to make a pathetic point?

Purposefully obtuse are we? Maybe we should remove that Burger King crown from new tobie's noggin and place it on the new "king".

I would be more upset if Obama made the false statements (outright lies) "You can keep your doctor..." or "You can keep your healthcare...", which he surely did. I'm sure many on the Right would feign outrage if he would have said "grab em", but the genuine outrage from what Obama did say is without a doubt justifiable. No one can hold a candle to the fake outrage expressed by Liberals.

For some unknown reason I thought I would get a better response. I guess I'm also in need of a crystal ball.

I guess I should play the national anthem then. Or would you prefer Taps? And it was just a simple little question that should have evoke a quick little response after reading how you condescendingly stated you could read people based on a non-response.

So no response on your part to clear questions. I quoted just one of your posts, but my post was a response to a few of the posts you have made on this subject. If someone hasn't read up enough on a topic to give an informed answer/response, you perceive that as condoning silence. That's not very logical and would require a crystal ball to garner the perceived answer. It seems you are making conclusions on assumptions...which seems very clear. And what's even worse, you use a condescending attitude to display your fallacy, which is quite comical. And since you didn't answer my question, I'll try again. I have not added my thoughts about Bergdahl to this topic, and I'm sure I've expressed my displeasure about NFL players kneeling/sitting during the anthem. What insightful information do you think you have gleaned about me?

Was she threatened in any way? Do you think we have a group that bands together to try to intimidate you or other Liberals? Why are you trying to intimidate us by calling us names? We all respond individually, but you have this seemingly innate desire to label each into your stereotypical groups. Why is that? And why do you post such nonsense then try to play victim when you get a response?

Please answer the question. You said mentally ill people should not possess guns, so what characteristics do you feel qualifies one as mentally ill? You once stated that you would not want a mechanic to perform surgery on you, but yet somehow you feel qualified to determine who should be deemed unfit for self-protection. Many on Left spout this same nonsense, and when asked to provide solutions, all-of-a-sudden become deathly silent, only to shout from the rooftops after the next tragedy. It's time to stop whining and offer solutions. It's odd that Liberals loudly complain, but when asked to give solutions all we get is the sound of silence. Reminds me of most of the protesters, shouting at the top of their lungs, but when a mike is placed in front of them all they have to say is "Fox lies". The next time you see one of these nut-job protesters doing this, instead of saying "bless his little heart", just realize that you and (s)he are one in the same.

When overusing a particular term (in your case "monolith"), try the online thesaurus. new tobie might be able to give you help finding it. And you should know about pedophiles, right? (See, I can do it too.)

And we've asked you over and over and over to give examples of this...but you can't. But somehow that qualifies as giving us a dose of our own medicine? You are some piece of work. And yes, it is sickening. You continually make false accusations against the board members, then act like you are a victim. How about if we just started calling you a pedophile. After all, according to your rules of conduct, we don't need supporting evidence...just keep stating it as fact long enough and people will start to believe it. What would happen to your career if your boss starts believing it? Keep calling me and the board members racist and I'll respond by calling you a pedophile. Or we can stop this childishness.

Did you miss the 15 times this link was posted on this forum? [Hidden Content]

Blah, blah, blah. You opened your mouth and when called out you run run run. That is just pathetic. The hateful bile you hold inside is making you look more and more stupid. Your posts are becoming ever more incomprehensible, and filled with hate, lies, and bogus stereotypes...the things you claim to abhor. Do you feel even the slightest bit of shame or guilt for calling a group of people racist with zero backing evidence?

Answer the question you brought up!

As usual, you are wrong. If not, name those people. Please give some examples of their behavior that has led you to this conclusion. It's a simple little question in which I have no doubt you will run from. And why are you running from a simple question that was the basis for this topic. You said we need to keep guns from the mentally ill. Please define the characteristics that define the mentally ill. It is a simple little question, but for some reason you choose to run, although you were the one that started the conversation.

You keep proving over and over you are the liar. Trump would need decades to catch you in that department. It is revealing that your source of hate is based on lies that have on multiple occasions been put right in front of your face. Willfull ignorance is the source of our laughter. At least you try...right?

Ooops, I was wrong. You actually don't have the ability to find the online thesaurus.

I think you missed my point. I don't think anyone on here will deny the plethora of sexual escapades on both sides. The point of this topic was to call out the folks that screamed from the rooftops their fake outrage about the Trump tapes. These same people are not very vocal about the recent revelations. It's not the actions by the perpetrators that is causing the disconcerting feelings, it is the response by the Liberals to each. The second part of my post was solely about calling out posters on this board for ignoring evidence. You called out this act from those on the Right, but did not call out the many, many, many examples of this from the Liberals on here. And thus my final sentence in my previous post.

What about the mentally ill? Please detail, or even outline, a law that you want that restricts guns from them. In order to do this you must describe who should be classified as "mentally ill". Go!

I think most of here are gleefully acknowledging the revelations of the dalliances of the Liberals because of the hyper-fake outrage expressed by the Left for the last two years. I find it odd...who am I kidding...I find it predictable that the Liberals went into meltdown mode over the Trump tapes, which was front page news for far too long on every Liberal "news" site, now are subdued by the current "news". I don't think many are defending Trump, just pointing out blatant hypocrisy. Maybe the many, many, many hypocrites on the Liberal side should be wearing those jackets. It gets frustrating when you provide evidence that slaps down someone's post, only to see that same person regurgitate the same ol' lies doesn't it. But yet the Liberals are still running free on this board. If there ever was a more appropriate time for this admonishment, it sure should not be directed at the members from the Right. Slapping down one side while ignoring the blatant and abundant use of this tactic might require someone to pull their jacket out of the closet. And before you start typing the response, I have my jacket in my hand.

Nope, no flaws at all. The analogy/comparision is just as far as you want to take it, and what point of view you want to apply to each situation.

Uh-oh. new tobie found the online dictionary. Wait till he finds the online thesaurus. He will find 50 different ways to say "grab um".

It is not at all flawed in the instance discussed...it is spot on. Republicans were just following a precedent set earlier. But I agree with your second part. I have never been a fan of the use of "precedents" in court cases. Each case should stand on it's on merits, regardless of previous rulings. Precedents are good for guiding behavior, but not for determining guilt or innocence. And in this case, the Democrats are the ones that invoked the precedent, then whined like children when the same tactic was used against them. That is childish. And I used the term Democrat instead of Liberal in this instance for good reason.

So the Supreme Court and every other court should ignore every precedent ruling. Hmmm.