Englebert

What laws would you suggest? I created a whole topic on this issue a while back. Please tell us peons what you would propose that would allow millions of people to protect themselves while simultaneously ensuring that the "bad guys" do not acquire these weapons. Please list your suggestions so we can see how much you really understand. This seems to be a very important topic for Liberals, and since you are a Liberal, I will deduce that it is a very important one for you. (Correct me if I am wrong.) It will be interesting to see if you run from such an important topic.

Have you downloaded that app that plays the sound of dangling keys? You must not have, you are still on this board.

And you don't even know the reasons why. How sad.

All you can muster for trash talk is to parrot/plagiarize the same lines I used on you...even you must realize how laughingly pathetic that is...yes, even you. And the laughter is only getting louder. You might want to stick with the "grab um" narrative. Your attempts at trash talk sound even worse than that gem. Maybe resurrect that "go feed your cats" line. That one made me literally LOL.

Where did you acquire this clairvoyant crystal ball? Are you actually trying to make a point that if someone doesn't respond to a topic then they somehow condone the issue...or not. That is just nonsense. I don't know how you feel about pro wrestling, therefore I can conclude you hate it. That's the narrative I want to push, so I will just add you to list of confirmations of my theory. And who is fence straddling? Are you implying that anyone that doesn't reply in a particular way to this topic is fence straddling? I have not added my thoughts about Bergdahl to this topic, and I'm sure I've expressed my displeasure about NFL players kneeling/sitting during the anthem. What insightful information do you think you have gleaned about me?

Are you really still trying to push that bogus and pathetic narrative? You sound as childish as new tobie.

I gave wild-spending Bill credit for working with the Right, although that capitulation came reluctantly and not without a fight. The Left will not admit that Bill was forced to change his wild spending ways and continually give him full credit for an economy that would never have happened if he had stuck to his ideology. And I'm very thankful that the Right will not work with the current Liberals in office. The loony Liberals have hi-jacked the once proud Democratic party and turned it into a despicable (or deplorable) platform of anti-American ideas. Compromise with them cannot be good for anybody. Please, I beg you, take back your party from these current nut-cases...then we can talk about compromising.

Newt Gingrich forced Clinton to adopt a more Conservative economic platform. Wild-spending Bill shut the government down twice in childish defiance before acquiescing to Gingrich's policies. I give Bill credit for finally "seeing the light", although he had to be arm-twisted. If left unchallenged Bill would have probably been just as bad as Obama.

Who are the "some" you speak of? Is it okay to respond to someone in the same manner/tone as theirs?

Did you read the article? It confirms you are a liar.

I'm in total agreement with you on the last part. I lost any respect I would have had for Brazile after 1: she gave Clinton the questions, and 2: she continually lied about it.

This coming from someone that constantly lies then runs. Am I supposed to be offended? Since you are in a "debating" mood, please give evidence of your many, many contentions that Trump wants to exclude the pre-existing conditions clause in a new healthcare package.

I for one would complain again.

By this statement I am assuming you think Donna Brazile slipped up and actually told the truth for once. Is that correct?

Comprehension is obviously not your friend.

Do you really think I actually believe that? That post was made in "Tobie style". And he still hasn't provided evidence that Trump wants to get rid of the "pre-existing condition clause" in a new healthcare package, even though he has stated it as fact on many occasions. I noticed you have not called him out on that. Maybe that is the problem in this world.

I believe that the only good folks are non-Liberals, regardless of skin color. Try and argue against that point. I dare you.

I was flabbergasted at the response from the Saints organization. From the article: “We will not allow Mr. Wells' decision and subsequent media appearances to distract our players and organization from continuing to honor and support our military and veterans," the statement read. "We, as an organization, have decided to move on from this sad and divisive discourse and focus our attention on supporting our military and veterans.” So the Saints organization feels that their players kneeling/sitting for the national anthem is not divisive, but someone that refuses to participate in this conduct is divisive? That statement in itself could not be more divisive. I find it almost hilarious and very sad that an organization can participate or condone a purposeful divisive action, then accuse anyone that speaks out against it, or simply refuses to condone it, as the divisive one. Maybe someone (or many people) should question the Saints organization on why they are trying to bully and stifle the 1st amendment rights of this man.

My statement was a joke based on this theme...one that you apparently didn't get. Do you think the cops picked up a Burger King meal and delivered it to Kaepernick while he was kneeling at his house during the playing of the national anthem?

Please provide some evidence of this statement. Yeah right, who am I kidding.

It is evident that you are in denial of facts, and the link you quoted is very short on them. Did you even read the article? I would be willing to bet you just read the headline and possibly one or two paragraphs. I'm willing to bet this because the article admits that practically every bit of the claims are subjective and interpretive. Would you like to discuss the article? After all, how hard could it be to debate someone that doesn't even have a high school diploma. I bet you cut and run just like every other time before. How you are not embarrassed by your own actions is incomprehensible and flabbergasting even to those with a lesser education.

Do you think Kaepernick takes a knee during the national anthem when he's watching the game from his home?

You are flat out "turrible" at trash talk. Do you enjoy embarrassing yourself? I heard about, witnessed first hand, and even studied a little on people that "play the fool", but you bring this phenomenon to heights unseen.

Always pushing the race card. You have to be extremely tired...to the point of exhaustion. Please tell us how anyone on this board could have posted this information without you immediately going on the attack. Please, give us an example of the proper way (in your mind) to share information without being labeled haters or racist. We would like this roadmap for future postings. If you don't share this roadmap, then one would have to believe you are merely attempting to stifle debate. Why are you trying to deny our 1st amendment rights? Do you enjoy bullying people? Why are you emulating the exact thing you accuse Trump of doing?

Did I miss the meetings where we join together and discuss our strategy for attacking the Liberals? If I disagree with a post, am I required to keep my mouth shut if two other posters on the Right have responded? About 8 months ago I listed the posters that had contributed to the last 10 topics on the board, and they numbered 60% Conservative leaning to 40% Democrat leaning...not really the overwhelming majority many elude to. We've lost a few from the far left, and I must say the board has definitely not shown a down tick because of it. The Liberal side (yes, I'm laying blame square on the Liberal board members shoulders) never see a problem with Dems, and mistakenly think Conservatives never see a problem with Republicans. The Conservatives on here have expressed displeasure for Trump and Conservatives on numerous occasions, but somehow that goes unseen by the Liberals. The equivalency is just not there, not matter how loud the Liberals scream that each side does the same. And I remember nappyroots saying he wanted to be a better poster, which was promptly followed with the usual accusation of Conservatives/board members being racist. I called him on it, as did others, and he took his ball and went home. No love loss here. And we can't have a debate on here because no one on the Left will debate. Go back and look at how often someone on the Left has made an accusation or regurgitated a Liberal talking point, then ran like a frightened schoolgirl when challenged to defend their post. Where is the equivalency? I don't see anyone on the Right running from a post they have made. On the rare times we actually get a topic for debate, we have to endure the childishness from the Left. It got to the point that I decided to respond in kind. Debating is not an option, so I felt I could either leave this forum or join in on the antics, and wow, does it ever drive Liberals wild to have their same tactics used against them. I don't particularly like engaging in that style, but it is comical to see their reactions. This equivalency many on the Left keep referring to is straight out of fantasy land.