Englebert

I'll ask you for the third time...can you provide evidence that Trump wants to eliminate the pre-existing conditions clause in any healthcare proposal? Why won't you answer a simple question to the narrative you keep pushing?

I think the searing bile of hate you hold inside has destroyed your last brain cell. And you are the only one blowing crap around here. Keep calling me a racist with no supporting evidence. You willingly (but probably unknowingly) expose your hate and stunted intellectual growth for all the world to see. The third graders have turned from laughter to sorrow. It is shameful and pitiful to see a grown man act more immature than they are.

If you believe in lagging indicators, then you must give full credit to Bush for getting Bin Laden, but we already know what your hypocritical stance will be. Do you realize that the Republicans controlled Congress at the end of Bill and Obama's final terms? So shouldn't you be thanking the Republican controlled Congress for these numbers? If not, please give some policy examples from both presidents that lead you to believe both are responsible for these unemployment numbers. I think I just heard the sonic boom resulting from you running from these questions.

You are going to Liberal prison for referring to a female professor using the male term. I'll be right there with you because I just used the newly outlawed gender terms. We better both keep our mouths shut because anything we say will be interpreted as racist.

I guess we should take down the statues of these men. Can you show me where one is located? And do you really wonder why nobody takes you serious? I'm sure your reasoning is mired in racism.

Did you mean to say "Good thing our founding fathers were wise enough to setup an election process whereby large urban population centers cannot control the rest of the country". I'm sure that's what you meant to say, unless you are totally naive and/or willfully ignorant of our existing election system. Who do you think should be in the World Series, Astros or Yankees? To not be a hypocrite you must say the Yankees because they outscored the Astros 22-20 in the ALCS. It shouldn't matter that the Astros won 4-3 in games. Maybe those folks in New York should be rioting and screaming racism, since the term racism doesn't mean anything anymore due to overuse or misuse.

Bill Clinton should be president king of Fox by your reasoning, and I bet you are admiring your poster of him as you admonish O'Reilly.

If you are curious about who loves you more, your dog or your wife, lock them both in the trunk of your car for two hours. When you open it up, guess which one will be glad to see you. (Can't remember author).

I think Jimmy Carter is the Rudy Ruettiger of presidents. The heart and will was in abundance, but was severely lacking on ability. One of the finest men to grace this Earth, one of the worst presidents to ever occupy the seat.

How about we go to a Dallas Cowboys practice and run this same experiment. Line all of the players up, tell, them to race for money, then ask, "If you went to a football camp when you were 5 years old, take two steps forward. If your dad brought you to see NFL games when you were a kid take two steps forward. If your dad was able to seat you in the skyboxes to witness a pro game, take two steps forward. If your dad paid for private football lessons when you were 10 years old, take two steps forward. If your dad introduced you to legendary coaches and retired NFL players, take two steps forward. If your dad used his influence to secure a starting position on your high school football team, take two steps forward. If your dad made a donation to your "college of (his) choice" to secure a position on the football team, take two steps forward. How would you react to this thought provoking experiment? Would you be surprised by forthcoming comments?

I have absolutely no doubt what-so-ever that this "experiment" was setup to focus entirely on race. I'm pretty flabbergasted that this "setup" was staged to evoke a response that you seem surprised at. I refrained from stating it earlier, but this is just another example of propaganda to elicit White guilt. To say it focuses on anything else is pretty naive in my opinion. This is just one in a long line of an increasingly long list of patronizing setups. :disappointedeyes.

I found it to be devoid of any significance or value. For example, who gets to determine how much a "two parent" family is worth? Is it really worth 2 steps, maybe 6 inches, or maybe 20 steps? Same applies for all of the questions? There is no doubt that socioeconomic status plays a big part, but the amount and significances of each factor is not really known. This example places a fixed and finite measurement to factors that have no measurability...therefore, is just an exercise in propaganda. If I would have submitted this "experiment" in college I would have undoubtedly received an "F". I'm not so sure now. A Liberal college would probably give me an "A" although the exercise is lacking any scientific standards rendering any conclusions worthless.

That's some very selective criteria. Do you think Michael Jordan's kids would have won that race if they were in it? (I'm just using him as an example, I don't even know if he has kids.)

So Trump made the statement "Wouldn't you love to see..." and you interpret that as Trump demanding the owners fire the players? I can see Big Girl regurgitating that Liberal nonsense, but didn't think anybody else could possibly fail that miserably on a simple statement. Hate can be a helluva... Maybe Trump engaged Obama first to make sure Obama wasn't sporting his manhood. Trump was just protecting his wife. And I would much rather have a President that does things that are mis-interpreted as "bad" or egotistical than have a President that lies directly to the face of the American people and the Liberal media says and does nothing. The blatant hypocrisy is on full display.

When did Trump tell/instruct/demand/order the owners to fire the players that kneel? I know the Liberal media has tried to portray that as fact. I assumed they failed miserably in this attempt, but now I'm not so sure.

My post was really a "well, duh" for Big Girl who refuses to accept this simple concept. It is clear to practically everybody but her. Can you give some examples of some of Trump's actions you feel deserves impeachment? And please contrast these behaviors with the "rules of respect" at your current job.

Are you actually posting links glamorizing Bill Maher...you know, the guy that disrespects woman. Remind me again what he called Sarah Palin. I thought you abhor people that disrespects women. Oh I forget, it depends on the political affiliation.

I half-way agree, and obviously half-way disagree. I agree that part of the "honor" should go to Hillary and her baggage, but the more significant contribution should be laid at the feet of the mainstream media that unfairly demonized Bush and unfairly patronized Obama. The American voter was finally motivated to say enough is enough.

Wow, a lot of big font words...but you still didn't answer the question. Can you be fired for refusing to wear clothes at work? Can you be fired for bringing a gun to work? Can you be fired for cursing your boss? Can you be fired for making disparaging remarks about the company you work for? I think even you should be able to understand this simple point. Can your boss fire you for breaking company rules? Let's see how many unrelated topics you can list instead of answering the question.

The American voter has the ability to throw out "bought and paid for" politicians. The American people can then vote in people that can root out and prosecute "bought and paid for" politicians. If bankers and corporations control this country, it is because the voters have allowed them to. The government takeover of the Healthcare system is an attempt to control the people, all of the people, not just benefit the medical industry. And what am I supposed to "see". You know nothing about me or my family or what we've been through, so I am not enamored with your profiling attempts. If you want a civil discussion, leave personal attacks out of the conversation. I have no problem resorting to that Liberal tactic and will respond in kind.

I am under the impression, which has been expressed by many, many people, that the Trump election is a direct result from people being fed up with the way Bush was unfairly criticized and demonized, and were frustrated that he did not fight back against the unfair treatment. These same people, me included, witnessed this pathetic treatment, then watched for eight years as Obama became the most coddled president in American history. Many voters wanted someone who would fight back, and Trump fit the bill with his crass and "politically incorrect" speech. In my opinion, shared by many, Trump's election win was a direct result of the Left's selective unfair treatment of Bush and coddling of Obama. So the Left has no one to blame but themselves. And when you say "you believe that Trump will say and do anything to anybody to further his agenda, and everything he does will benefit people like himself"...I believe that statement is more aptly applied to Obama. Obama was/is an ideologue that will practice deception and engage in unscrupulous behavior to further the Liberal agenda. That is documented. Trump has no allegiance to any party or belief system, and is attempting to do what he feels is right for the American people, thus drawing scorn from the Left and the Right. The Left propaganda machine is in full force, and the Right does not have his back. And this is coming from someone that is not a fan of his.

I asked rolltides these questions, but he did not answer. Since you absolutely agree with his post, you should be able to answer them. So here goes. Can you give some examples of how these bankers, corporations and weapons manufacturers control this country? And what are the solutions? And if we throw out the old regime, how can we guarantee that the new regime won't follow in the same footprints? Is more government the answer? If so, how do we throw out the current bums and replace them with future bums?

What about it? Are you in possession of some unbiased intelligence on the subject that you would like to share?

Was that quote worth your time? Better yet, do you feel the other board members should have to waste their time reading that comment? Do you feel this type of comment is exactly why many of the regular board posters no longer participate, or do you feel that the Conservative members are the source of their departure?

Can you point to precisely where the Constitution grants this "right"? And will you please answer my questions: Can your boss fire you if you refuse to wear clothing at work? Can your boss ban you from bringing a gun to his workplace?