Englebert

And one spouting garbage that nobody wants to hear. Congrats on dumbing down this forum.

Are you actually suggesting that because we call out Liberal posters and don't let them get by with false, inaccurate a sweeping generalizations that we are somehow at fault. What should we do to keep the Liberals posters...give out "likes" when they bash Trump with pathetic lies. Should we reply with "That's a good boy" after reading these pathetic statements. Please give us a roadmap on how, or why, we should coddle the Liberal posters when they spew their hate-filled garbage on this site. My question for you is "Is the website better or worse when void of the Liberal hate-speech?"

This exact article could have been written in the late 1990s...and many were, but were ignored...just like this one will be. All of the models have been wrong, and wrong on the warm side. Any sane person would have to question why the models are always wrong, and are always wrong on one side. Could it be due to the fact that if a crisis exists or is imminent, the money for research/remediation flows like wine, and if a catastrophic issue is not a hand, the money becomes scarce? I don't have the time to give this issue the proper response just yet, but I will definitely revisit this issue at a later date.

You didn't say because you don't want to admit the negativity and hate is primarily generated by the Left. That is undisputable, but you and your ilk always try to play the equivalency card. That's just like saying Lois Lerner and the IRS targeted each side. My post had nothing to do with race, but as usual you have to bring it up because you won't dare tackle the issue at hand. And you are right up there with the king of misinterpreting the type of talk I brought up in my last post. You bring it up and run like a little child when challenged to defend your statements. I'll save my posts for Big Girl and newtobie, but will also call you out when you post that nonsense. You've made some good posts in the past and some good posts recently, but you still maintain your Liberal stance that me and everyone on this board that doesn't tow the Liberal line is inherently racist and bigoted, and the percentage of bad eggs are somehow equal. You have made it abundantly clear you follow the Liberal agenda and have no problem throwing out backhanded insults to non-Liberals. Go run and hide some more...but don't think I won't call you out or ask you to defend your statements.

Who is spouting the negativity and hate? Please call them out...Left or Right. I bet you won't do it. I think you are using the old tired "tried and true" tactic of equivalency when equivalency does not exist. So please, engage in your best attempt to defend this statement. I don't think I will hold my breath.

Why would you resist going back to the days of real men...the days of your heroes. Oops, I get it...you only spout out crapola when you think it sounds good but have no inkling of a smidgen of a slice of an idea of what you are talking about. Luckily most on this board see through your imbecilic rhetoric that is actually just plagiarized non-sense garnered from the biased media that pulls your puppet strings, and we continually laugh at your absurdity. And as Westend1 would say...LOL.

Thanks for confirming that exists only in your imagination land. Seek help before the bile destroys what few brain cells you have left. Maybe a trip to the land that still holds fellow men as slaves would educate you on your station in life...the attainment that was fought for by both of our blood lines.

It's nice know that you think you can judge what we would think, but your past posts have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are extremely incapable of making such determinations.

Are you trying to make a point with this link? Please explain. Your biased hate for Trump seems to make you quote worthless garbage that you somehow feel is relevant.

You really need to read a book once in a while. Please do some research on the biography of each of those men listed and see if your angel-like admiration holds up. And please make sure not to forget to research how many minorities each of these men hired for any position above grunt laborer.

The same one that lied to your face about keeping your doctor and healthcare system. The same one that weaponized the EPA and IRS. The same one that spied on reporters and political rivals. But you conveniently forget and forgive him for that, but feel a searing bile spewing from you gut when Trump embellishes a golf score. Your hatred is so hypocritical and so comical.

Yes, the Trump team has rolled out many, many employees bragging about how good it is to work for him. You are just limited to the knowledge that your Liberal handlers want you to hear. And your interpretation skills are severely lacking when judging people, so your analysis of Trump is worth less than garbage. You have a biased hate for Trump, and it is really laughable and sad that you are the only one that cannot see your clouded judgement. At least it is entertaining for us.

I see your comprehension skills have not improved in the last few weeks. But then, I didn't expect improvement. You only see/read what you are conditioned to believe.

You would just close your eyes and read what you want to read anyway.

Let's get Vanderbilt, Rockefeller, Morgan, or Carnegie for President. They can then cut out overtime pay, cut out unions, increase the workweek to 60 hours, cut out sick time, family leave time, maternity and paternity leave, cut out vacation time, cut out 401k and medical benefits. They wouldn't have to worried about Affirmation Action, soft quotas, Civil Rights legislation, or any of the strangling EPA or Conservation legislation. They also wouldn't have to worry about anti-trust laws. The big corporations would then be free to earn obnoxious amounts of money without having to worry about the worker or the environment, just like in the time of their reign.

The refutation is coming. I have been preparing (and partaking) with some friends tonight, but will certainly reply tomorrow. A simple cursory reading is more than enough to show you have absolutely nothing but the same old crap expounded by the neo-nazi global warmists that has no basis in science. I can dispel or call out the highly questionable conclusions of the above "facts" (what most people call propaganda). I'm in the process of preparing for a natural occurrence of "weather" (which will surely be deemed a predicted disaster due to Man-made interference) and am pressed for time at this moment. But I can state with 100% accuracy your post does not give any more credence to the lie that masquerades as a legitimate science model. In fact, the lie still continues to be the biggest and most pathetic attempt of controlling man in the history of mankind. The simple fact that this lie has garnered any credence at all is astonishing. I guess that's what happens when intelligent men get fooled.

Did you even read this article. It basically says, in a nut-shell, man is the cause the global warming and we don't need to provide any stinking evidence. Our "peer-reviewed" studies are hand-picked peers that agree with us 100%. 98% of "climatologists" agree because we did a (laughable) textual search, even though we know this is inherently subjective and highly fallible. The Exxon studies are worthless for the mere fact that they are not in agreement with our undocumented premise. I've laid out the hypothesis for man-made global warming, and this article can't even come close to validating any of the three. In case you forgot, they are: 1) The Earth is warming 2) Man is the cause 3) this warming is detrimental to Earth's health. Simply stating that the Earth is warming, admittedly based on altered and manipulated data is not proof. Saying Man is the cause while providing no casual link is a slap in the face to everyone that adheres to the scientific method. These people are the real science deniers. So I'm guessing that the education part is your admittance that the Man-Made Global Warming people are neo-nazi fascists that want to dictate and control every aspect of our lives through misinformation and junk science. That is what I gathered from this article. Where am I going wrong?

No wonder you don't protest a judge's racist opinion of you (see other thread)...you have no clue when you are being insulted...but instead focus on imagined and false narratives that can only be dreamed up by a simpleton. And I think you are just parroting this diatribe of fictional vitriol (meaning I don't think you possess the skill set to reach simpleton level).

I meant it's baffling why minorities seem to not be offended and propelled to speak out against these type of blatantly racist decisions. I have absolutely no doubt that you are correct in concluding the judge understands the people in question will vote democrat, and her reasoning for that decision is about as racist as anyone can get. Even Robert E. Lee would be thinking "Man, that judge is racist".

I'm guessing (no sarcasm at all) that many/most folks 50 to 100 years from now will look upon us as dirty, crude, ignorant, sickening simpletons that actually slaughtered and ate animals. Our time will be judged as the dark, dark ages when man murdered animals for fun. If anyone wants a statue of themselves to still be standing in the future, you better become Vegan real quick. We will be judged by futuristic standards, as we are judging historical people according to our present standards.

I keep wondering why minorities, especially Blacks, are not outraged by these types of decisions. The judge is basically saying that she thinks Blacks (and Hispanics) are too stupid to obtain an ID. Many of you keep trying to find and protest non-examples of racism...then you have a prime example of racism right here and you say nothing. That is just baffling.

I expected nothing more in regards to a response of yours. You keep showing your hateful colors though, just like the good little sheeple you are. Get caught in a lie and simply lob personal attacks instead of admitting you were wrong. Those Liberal leaders have sure did a number on you.

But yet it still happens. And many of the Liberal folks eat it up like candy. And what's funny is that if you try to point out the fabrications, you get labeled as a Trump supporter, a "Trumptard", and many despicable descriptions. It seems the Liberals have decreed that you have to walk in a regimental lock-step with their warped way of thinking lest be branded as one of their many ridiculous monikers. And please provide links to some of the videos of Trump making a fool of himself. I've seen a few, but have also witnessed misinterpretations and severely biased analysis so often that it makes me wonder just how hilariously low the Liberals can go with these distortions and fabrications. It's usually comical to see what Liberals consider "abnormal" or unpresidential behavior (if we can even get an example), especially in the context of the previous eight years.

Here's my thoughts: You lie. When did Trump ever state he would pay for his own protection? Please show some evidence. More thoughts: [Hidden Content] From the article: Later Monday morning, Alles told CNN in a statement that the problem isn’t just related to the Trump administration and has been going on for many years. “This issue is not one that can be attributed to the current administration’s protection requirements but, rather, has been an ongoing issue for nearly a decade due to an overall increase in operational tempo,” he said in the statement.

How is this description any different than the neo-Nazi or White supremacists you so abhor?