Englebert

If this was directed at me, you missed my point entirely. We (anti-Socialists) are not the ones that nit-picked Obama for 8 years. We had very, very legitimate gripes. Your side is the carrier of the nit-picking torch. Example: One of Trump's biggest and most deceitful lies was that he said he had the biggest inauguration, or his golf handicap. I point out that Obama destroyed our healthcare system and weaponized the I.R.S. and get labeled a racist. And it seems, even though in jest, you've joined the ranks of ones that have all-of-a-sudden opened their eyes after being shut for 8 years, and can see deep into a man's soul just by viewing a simple photo with narration by wing-nut Socialist Liberals ate up with TDS. I point out legitimate disagreements with the previous administration and get branded a alt-Right, neo-nazi, hateful, spiteful, racist, homophobe, deplorable,... There is absolutely no way I could have said anything negative against Obama, even in jest, without being on the receiving end of these monikers. So, even in jest on my part, I pointed that out. And the response is I need to lighten up and you are taking your football and going home. I'm afraid the "lightening up" is not something I'm in need of.

Now this is funny. We have the best hope of the Left now caving to the pathetic nut-wing Liberal disease by taking an innocuous photo and exaggerating it to a mental disease. This would be semi-okay if the rage would have also emanated from past transgressions of the office, but to equate a person looking towards the sun as a mental disease is not only stretching, it is really disgraceful. And before you reply, think about this. If I would espouse derision towards Obama for doing something similar, I would be excoriated to no end as petty, or hateful, to racist. So you don't get a pass...I'm a full circuit critic. You might have said it in jest, but I would not be afforded the same courtesy.

So you can't answer a question a 2nd grader could answer. Typical and expected.

Do you think the vandals voted for Trump or Hillary?

Is it your point that the Left is not contributing their fair share to this forum?

I'm guessing this is an example of Westend's plea for intelligent debate. Should we not attempt a response to this garbage or reply and be labeled as childish mud-slingers and hate-mongers. Is this the type of post that anyone, Left or Right, feel is a contribution to the debate forum that many of us would like to have? As long as these type of posts are not condemned, I feel like in-kind responses are the only resort. What say you Westend? Any ideas on how to respond to this senselessness? And feel free to discuss which posts you think are similar that should be condemned by everyone. I would love to discuss the merits of posts from the Right versus posts from the Left.

If REBgp uses my same categories to describe people on the Left, then his quote is absolutely correct. I label the nut-case socialists, exclusionists, hate-mongering, race-baiters as Liberals, and the sane but misguided people that prefer a bigger government as Democrats. I would not put you in my Liberal category. But I'll let REBgp respond.

Do you really feel competent making psychological assessments based on board participation? Really? Do you? At least your posts have entertainment value.

I can't believe FoxNews would even consider including an article that relies on "stats" from the Southern Poverty Law Center.

I'm with Nash. How did it sound to you?

I noticed these broad strokes...but these were/are being lobbed by the Liberals on this board. I initially tried to debate. Then attempted to just asking for evidence to support these unsubstantiated allegations. Finally, and reluctantly, resorted to using the same despicable tactics in retaliation. You could probably have a debate with anyone on this site from the Right, but try having a debate with the Liberal posters on here. If you think anyone on the Right is using unjust broad strokes, ask them to defend their opinion, and you will get an answer. Ask anyone on the Left, and you will get crickets, only to see the same vile being spewed at a later time. The evidence is abundant and overwhelming. You haven't posted much on this forum so I'm not putting you in their category. In fact, I have no doubt I could have a congenial debate with you. I'll throw Westend in there also because I believe I can (and had a few) adult debates with him. (Although I think he frequently uses the Liberal tactic of diving into the mud at times...as do I.) But try having any debate above a 3rd grade level with anyone else on the Left and it will devolve into childishness in less than two posts. I see absolutely no equivalency, just retaliation using like tactics. If you would like to debate on which side has degraded this forum into childish mudslinging, I will gleefully accept that challenge. I can pick one poster and have enough smut to overwhelm your evidence 10 fold.

Do you think 2 degrees from Texas A&M qualifies as an inferior education?

I'm guessing many don't vote. But for the ones that do, I would guess Trump for the sole reason that the Left's platform (but not practiced) is total inclusion, which is definitely not a selling point for them. They are as exclusionary as the Leftist, but they admit it. Like I said previously, I have no idea what the economic values are for these guys and don't know if that even factors into their decisions. I'm fairly certain they were not happy with either candidate, as was most of the country, but for different reasons.

I think they align with the Left point of view way more than they align with the Right point of view...both want total control. But they differ extremely on who should be the elitists/favored. And I think that was what the post was alluding to. I actually have no idea what the economic values are of the Nazis, KKK, etc (small vs big government).

You don't have to go to the video...we have examples on this board (but from the other side). I'm curious as to who you think is indoctrinating the people on the video. Do you think they are rabid Fox News viewers? Or maybe rabid MSNBC viewers? Do you fault the educational system (K-12, College, College Graduate School)? Do you fault Trump or Obama? And what percentage of people do you think on the Right are indoctrinated versus the the percentage of people on the Left that are indoctrinated?

They sound like Muslim jihadists. And we all know it is absolutely forbidden to equate those extremists with real Muslims. Why is there no crossover equivalency with that line of thinking?

We don't watch CNN.

Please enlightened us as to what you find delusional. And don't forget to include some of Big Girls and new tobies posts. In fact, that's probably your only material.

They only thing I learned from that link is you have a problem discerning truthful, legitimate and/or relevant information from biased propaganda...then again, I already knew that.

Did you hear what sounded like a jumbo jet go straight over your head?

I'll defend the Nazis. As I'm sure the other five will also. We are all card-carrying skinheads that want to torture, rape, brutalize then kill every Black, Jew, Mexican, Hispanic, Muslim, non-Christian in the world...including their pets. We think every non-White is a subhuman and unfit to walk in our shadows, and are deserving of death in the most unimaginably cruel fashion. It doesn't matter what I or others write, that is what you will believe. It is frightfully easy to see from your posts.

You might want to ask someone to analyze your posts. Pick any third grader...they will readily see your flawed thought processes and have better insight as to how you might improve on your ability to comprehend the posts on this site. Frankly, I hope you keep posting. Since we can't have real discussions on here, at least you can entertain us.

Maybe he should call it "workplace violence". Well, since it wasn't at "work" (these were not paid rioters), maybe he should just label it a "vehicular incident". You know, attempt to minimize the situation as performed on multiple occasions by the previous administration. If you are angry at Trump for waiting two days to repeat his denouncement, surely you are livid at Obama. Or is it you only pick and choose which facts to weigh based on political affiliation. I would ask you to give a response but we all know how that will go.

Everybody on this board has seen repeatedly your analytical skills. You support whatever your Liberal nut-cases tell you to believe, and you invent "facts" to substantiate your misguided beliefs. Your attempts to label me and others are just so ridiculous and hilarious.

Are you saying you support the suppression of free speech?