Englebert

Such fake outrage. You are so transparent even 3rd graders can see right through you. And the hypocrisy is just unbelievable.

Do you actually feel competent enough to evaluate who are racist? If so, why? Please enlighten us with your criteria as to who is deserving of your racist moniker. Can you name a single Conservative that you feel is not racist? You've ran from every other question posed to you, so I'm sure you will do the same for these.

I'm right there with you on some of these. I'm pissed that he hasn't persuaded Congress to repeal Obamacare. I'm even more pissed about him pushing replacement of Obamacare. I'm also pissed he hasn't called for a special prosecutor for Hillary. But I'm so overjoyed that Hillary is not occupying the White House. That would be a disaster. Trump has done some very good things, and has appointed some very good people. But the best thing he has done is to be non-PC, which allows the Liberals to show their true hateful colors. The fake outrage is so very comical, and it clearly illustrates the bias in the media. Obama did/said many of the same things, and worse, but was given a pass on everything. The MSM would holler for days if Trump said he ate a hamburger and it turned out to be a cheeseburger. (Thank you Nash for that one...I had to steal it.)

Lufkin and McAllister Park met in the second round. If I'm not mistaken, both pitched their aces in their first game (I know Lufkin did). These pitchers were not available again until the finals. The Lufkin ace had 14 strikeouts in Lufkin's first game. I don't know how many he had in the finals against McAllister Park, but he pitched a very good game...as did the McAllister Park pitcher.

In that case, Trump gets full credit for our upgraded military despite the attempts to apply Liberal logic. Obama's legacy is not something he or anyone should talk about without hanging their head in shame. Taps would almost be the appropriate background music anytime his legacy is the topic of focus, except Taps should only be played when showing respect.

No, no, no...and no. You stated previously that what was accomplished during an administration but was started in a previous administration, then the previous administration gets the credit. Just like a Liberal to take credit for other's deeds, picking and choosing which traits are noteworthy based solely on political affiliation. How you people sleep at night is mind boggling.

If Obamacare was so popular Trump would have never been elected. Obamacare has never had over a 50% approval rating in any major poll. (Even Trump has been over 50% in most polls at some time.) And I really do hope you realize that the ACA, the (Un)Affordable Care Act, and Obamacare are all the same thing. They all have the moniker of being the worst legislation in American history. Too bad we have 47% of the population who don't pay their fair share of taxes but demand the other half pay from cradle to grave. What a utopia this world has become when one can demand others pay for their care, and scream like little dependent children when someone suggests they must pay their own way.

How does Obamacare fair in that poll? What about Hillary...is she still leading by double digit points? And thanks for the laugh with that oxymoron. It's been a while since anyone has had the audacity to use "fair and equal" to describe a Progressive, even though the label was self-described through the eyes of a liberal.

So George Bush got Bin Laden. Is that what you are saying?

I agree, that is more than enough reason to start secession proceedings. I'm fairly certain the Liberals still want to move toward Socialism even after witnessing the damage an extreme ideologue can do to the country in just 8 years.

You never answered the question as to why you think many posters left this forum. You would think we would get plenty of posters on here anxious to read the intellectually uplifting quips from new tobie. You would also guess that many posters would be chomping at the bit to debate/refute the many "far Right wing nut" links (as interpreted by the unbiased, all-inclusive, morally and intellectually superior free-thinkers who comically refer to themselves as Progressive Liberals). And according to many on here, the Conservative posters outnumber the Liberal posters 50 to 1, and use this (false) majority to suppress the Liberals posters through unmitigated and swarming personal attacks. And, according to many, the links highlighting biased, far-Right blowhards should be condemned by everyone, while in the same topic the collective intellectual and extremely unbiased "moderates" highlighted are beyond reproach...and unfounded dissension to these links is just a sign of the unenlightened pack mentality of the deplorables beyond the scope of refute or acknowledgement. Furthermore, any and all ridicule of acts by the current President are acceptable, while the same or worse acts of the past President are completely off-limits and any comparisons are unfair and completely out-of-bounds. And, along those same lines, any personal attacks on the current President reflect an accurate description of his mental state while like attacks on the former President are performed by blind, biased, racist, hateful sycophants and should be prohibited by law. Did I adequately explain why so many posters seem to refrain from voicing their opinions on this forum?

Your fake outrage is comical.

I watched a documentary on the "Wrecking Crew", who were a group of studio musicians in Los Angeles. I was surprised to find out Glen Campbell was a member. I was then shocked to find out that Campbell was the tour replacement for Brian Wilson of the Beach Boys, after Wilson was no longer able to tour.

Why do you seem to be obsessed with polling numbers...well, only polls that fit your agenda. If a warden is doing a good job running a prison, what do you think a poll of the inmates would look like?

Did you actually just try to demean Reagan by accusing him of posting looney biased links? This coming in the same post in which you include a looney biased link? Keep this up and your credibility will sink to ...well, I'll just leave it there.

That emphatically illustrates you don't understand my statement at all. I expected at least a little comprehension, but apparently I was wrong.

I wasn't changing the subject, just illustrating the point that Liberals try to rewrite history in their own sick and distorted way. The topic was and still is about jobs, and we are now reminded and acutely aware that Liberals tend to skew history. I'm surprised with your intellectual superiority you wasn't able to deduce this. Can I get a LOL?

And Obamacare is doing great. Yeah, we all know the talking points. Surprisingly to Liberals, not everyone is easily fooled and follow blindly.

That's like getting analyzed by a first grader. If you have ever witnessed a elementary kid calling his teacher dumb, you will understand how I view your post. Your continual focus on such non-issues related to Trump, while acting like these are world-stoppers, clearly illustrates your pettiness and unbelievable partisanship. And you will invariably say that I am supporting Trump based on the fact that I simply called you out for making a worthless post. Same ol' story, same ol' epic snowflake meltdown. The perpetual grin on my face keeps getting wider every time I see a Liberal expose their true colors. I guess you consider Forbes a made-up website. It is clear that when you worship at the Liberal media alter, you get only the biased filtered news for your viewing pleasure. [Hidden Content] So if I was a Liberal, I could now empathically state that you are a liar and not worthy of your job...and should be fired immediately. When you read this you will probably be thinking, what an over-reaction to such a simple mistake. That's is an everyday occurrence for sane people when witnessing the media and snowflakes talk about Trump.

It was the most watched/viewed/listened to inauguration speech of all-time when factoring in those whose watched on TV/internet. Fact! That makes you the liar. I don't know what was said about the Boy Scout speech, so I won't comment, but listing this second on the list shows the utter pettiness of the snowflake Liberals. Who in Mexico are you referring that says the conversation never happened. Sure sounds like you are falling for the biased MSM. Like you said, not a lie on health care. Russia! Russia! Russia! Any significance to this. Trump never said he would have Mexico pay for the initial construction of the wall. Another case of sheeple blindly following the biased press. I never heard him say he would never play golf or go on vacations if elected, so I have no clue. But Liberals have been spouting the ridiculousness of Trump spending too much time tweeting, which took time away from his job as President. That is just hilarious. I contend that treating the LGBT community as equals instead of a group that deserves preferential treatment is better for the group in the long run. Please, please, please respond to this one. I laughed at him saying he was more presidential... I have a feeling he said that to watch the snowflakes heads explode...and it worked. He won the popular vote...probably, when you factor out the illegal/dead voters. Why are Liberals so afraid of voter ID and investigations into voter fraud. I have no idea how many illegal votes were cast, but I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out to be 5 million. We will probably never know. Obama had a history of spying on his "enemies", and his administration seems to have unmasked an inordinate amount of Trump's admin, so common sense would lend credence to this. Anybody with a lick of sense can see sheeple blindly following the Liberal talking heads. I never heard him say anything about getting hit with drugs thrown over the wall, but he did say he wanted a transparent wall so American law enforcement can see the other side. I have no idea of the feasibility of this idea. I'll wait for some estimates, as long as these estimates don't come from the Congressional Budget Office. What did he say about Rubio's family? I know he said some crude and tasteless things about many of the GOP candidates and family. So in conclusion, your task seemed to be to list Trump's lies. After all, the biased Liberal media has been harping all year about how Trump lies constantly. If we are to believe the media, this list should have some whoppers on it. But alas, it is devoid of any substantial statements. In other words, an epic fail. Obama's lies sent our healthcare system into a death spiral, while Trump brags about how well his speeches are received. But for some reason Liberals can still remarkably maintain their moral and intellectual superiority stance. Now that is funny.

That is a big fat lie in and of itself. Who did you say was the liar?

Wow, this one is even worse than the Teen Vogue link you posted. Would you care to discuss?

So you still can't come up with anything...even resorting to using a Teen Vogue propaganda hit piece. Would you like to discuss any of these so-called "lies" mentioned in the article? I bet you don't. Do you even know what a lie is? God help the children. I sure hope that, even in their young impressionable years, they refrain from mimicking the Liberal childish antics they are witnessing.

Did you actually think I was comparing Trump to Albert Einstein? Really? Not even a gradeschool kid could come to that conclusion from reading my post. You are seriously missing more than a few cards from the deck.

No, I am emphatically stating it. I'm sure if Albert Einstein was elected as a Republican he would invariably be called an idiotic moron verging on the fringes of retardism by every Liberal pundit, and that sentiment would be echoed by a few on here. The false claim that he couldn't tie his shoes would be treated as gospel. New and false claims about his intellectual competency would emerge on a daily basis. He would surely be labeled a racist, fascist, deplorable, homophobic, Islamophobic, anti-Semitic (although he was Jewish), a bully, a racist (have to add that one twice), imbecilic, etc, etc, etc. Of course his hair would also be fair game. The pattern for Liberals is undeniable. Their self-proclaimed moral and intellectual superiority is viewed by them as beyond reproach, but the source of entertainment for the sane. Sorry for the ambiguity.