Englebert

That behavior is not bound to an age limit by the side that lost to the 70 year old man. Didn't you admit you cried like a baby whose candy was stolen when learning of the election results? Didn't your party retreat to safe spaces supplied with crayons and Play-doh after learning their side lost. Remind me again, who is acting like a belligerent child? Please save yourself some embarrassment and refrain from answering.

I've been enduring for what seems like an eternity the argument that the NFL players have the right to protest. Every post in favor of the protests always emphatically site the fact that the players have this right. My question is "Who is denying that this right exists?" Can someone please point to any group or any person that denies that the NFL players have a "right" to protest. For you people that keep qualifying your statements with this fact, why do you think other people do not have the "right" to protest the NFL players protests. You seem to want to oppress any opposition to the players stance...which is in fact denying one's right to protest. For the life of me I can't get a grasp on the absurdity of this stance. Will someone please explain it?

I'm confused. I've heard many Liberal/anti-Trump folks complaining about Trump's tweets. The usual quote is "He needs to think before he tweets". So if Trump is not putting much thought into a tweet, how much presidential time is he exhausting? Is it as much as a round of golf? Does he not deserve a 30 second break out of his day? Should he go on vacation instead of tweeting? Would that be a better use of his presidential time? (I would venture to say yes to the last one. All politicians should spend a lot less time trying to "help".)

So no answer to my post...just pathetic deflection. If I was a betting man I would have made a lot of money....well, if was able to get anyone to bet that you would make a on-topic coherent post. I would have given a 1000-1 odds you would not answer my post and probably still would have not gotten any takers...and for good reason.

The hate spewing out in the form of racial bigotry and generalized stereotypes. I thought you were against such things. Why have you not mentioned the trillions of dollars, allowed and supported by Whites, spent on social welfare programs specifically targeted to Blacks? Why not mention the passage of Civil Rights, Affirmative Action, and many outreach programs that would never exist without the support of the White majority? It seems you can conveniently ignore these things while casting racial stereotypes based on things that happened 50+ years ago. Following your line of thinking I guess I can surmise that all Blacks hate Whites. You are the epitome of what you claim to hate.

Is this a invitation for a intellectual debate? I'm curious...it is just so strange that someone would complain about the lack of real debates, blame a certain group for the void, then continually make childish posts.

The indoctrination seems complete. Since you seem to be so in-tune with this proposed "cut", please explain to the six Conservatives on this board how slowing "INCREASED" funding to a bloated program, which happens to include Meals On Wheels, is somehow a bad thing. Keep in mind that this country is $20 trillions dollars in debt, and on the verge on getting another credit rating reduction (which has only happened once, and guess who was occupying the White House). I bet you won't respond. In fact, I dare you to respond. Maybe the "dare" will motivate you to read a little bit and educate yourself on this proposal instead of blindly following the propaganda espoused by your leaders.

I think these estimates of what we taxpayers pay for illegals is way off the mark. I believe the true amount is much higher. I've read studies from years ago that have estimated as much as $350 billion a year is spent on illegals.

Would this board be better off with or without your "debating" method? No need to answer, we already know. The entertainment value would drop tremendously though.

Someone got his feathers riled. It's funny that the anger stems from responses to absurdity, making it completely self-inflicted.

Wow, an internet tough guy now? Join the millions. And it's funny you don't like profiling while continuing to profile. You don't like posters making assumptions about you but you constantly make assumptions about other posters. Must be the mindset ingrained by the Liberal masters.

Somehow in your feeble mind Conservatives are responsible for running off Liberal posters based on my post while reading your pathetic response. If the light ever came on in your brain you be would blinded beyond repair. Forget the 3rd graders, even the Liberals are now laughing at you.

You continually show your lack of comprehension skills. And it is comical that you freely display these severely lacking skills and even try interpreting for your superior intellectuals (yes, that includes nappy roots). Carry on...we were starting to miss the comedic relief.

Thanks new tobie for this. We've gone a whole few days without one reference to "grab'em". Maybe the Liberal posters might feel free to rejoin this board, knowing that they don't have to defend "by association" your pathetic posts. Big Girl and six burg have rejoined the fray since your proclamation...which I assume is due to the fact that they once again feel free to express their opinions without your harmful help.

You have to not get caught when you proclaim you made an attempt to find work...and nobody checks. You are just that stupid naïve aren't you (the benefit of the doubt is being stretched to it's capacity). It's called abuse. Learn it, know it, politician poses (you'll catch this if you watch some of the recent commercials.)

I don't know the qualifications or disqualifications of his opponent. If he is running against a Liberal, then yes he should in win in a landside even if he is deemed mentally insane..the lesser of two mentally incompetences. The last presidential race should have open every ones eyes to that...but sadly some remain closed.

I'm not a big fan of McCain, but I like him more for shooting down this horrible bill. I'm pretty pissed at every Congressman that supports it. When are they gonna get it through their thick skulls that "Replacement" is not an option. Many thanks go out to McCain and especially Rand Paul for their stance on this. Now just repeal Obamacare already.

And one spouting garbage that nobody wants to hear. Congrats on dumbing down this forum.

Are you actually suggesting that because we call out Liberal posters and don't let them get by with false, inaccurate a sweeping generalizations that we are somehow at fault. What should we do to keep the Liberals posters...give out "likes" when they bash Trump with pathetic lies. Should we reply with "That's a good boy" after reading these pathetic statements. Please give us a roadmap on how, or why, we should coddle the Liberal posters when they spew their hate-filled garbage on this site. My question for you is "Is the website better or worse when void of the Liberal hate-speech?"

This exact article could have been written in the late 1990s...and many were, but were ignored...just like this one will be. All of the models have been wrong, and wrong on the warm side. Any sane person would have to question why the models are always wrong, and are always wrong on one side. Could it be due to the fact that if a crisis exists or is imminent, the money for research/remediation flows like wine, and if a catastrophic issue is not a hand, the money becomes scarce? I don't have the time to give this issue the proper response just yet, but I will definitely revisit this issue at a later date.

You didn't say because you don't want to admit the negativity and hate is primarily generated by the Left. That is undisputable, but you and your ilk always try to play the equivalency card. That's just like saying Lois Lerner and the IRS targeted each side. My post had nothing to do with race, but as usual you have to bring it up because you won't dare tackle the issue at hand. And you are right up there with the king of misinterpreting the type of talk I brought up in my last post. You bring it up and run like a little child when challenged to defend your statements. I'll save my posts for Big Girl and newtobie, but will also call you out when you post that nonsense. You've made some good posts in the past and some good posts recently, but you still maintain your Liberal stance that me and everyone on this board that doesn't tow the Liberal line is inherently racist and bigoted, and the percentage of bad eggs are somehow equal. You have made it abundantly clear you follow the Liberal agenda and have no problem throwing out backhanded insults to non-Liberals. Go run and hide some more...but don't think I won't call you out or ask you to defend your statements.

Who is spouting the negativity and hate? Please call them out...Left or Right. I bet you won't do it. I think you are using the old tired "tried and true" tactic of equivalency when equivalency does not exist. So please, engage in your best attempt to defend this statement. I don't think I will hold my breath.

Why would you resist going back to the days of real men...the days of your heroes. Oops, I get it...you only spout out crapola when you think it sounds good but have no inkling of a smidgen of a slice of an idea of what you are talking about. Luckily most on this board see through your imbecilic rhetoric that is actually just plagiarized non-sense garnered from the biased media that pulls your puppet strings, and we continually laugh at your absurdity. And as Westend1 would say...LOL.

Thanks for confirming that exists only in your imagination land. Seek help before the bile destroys what few brain cells you have left. Maybe a trip to the land that still holds fellow men as slaves would educate you on your station in life...the attainment that was fought for by both of our blood lines.

It's nice know that you think you can judge what we would think, but your past posts have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are extremely incapable of making such determinations.