Englebert

Please look up these "lawsuits galore"...don't just blindly follow what your Liberal leaders have told you to believe. Do a little research and then let us know what you find. How many lawsuits were brought against him, and how many did he win? How many lawsuits did he file against others, and how many did he win? There is a reason the Liberal spin doctors dropped this topic in a hurry. You don't seem to have caught up yet.

The New York Times, now there is an unbiased bastion of truth tellers. If they were to publish a list of their lies the paper would contain more pages than War And Peace.

All I can say is WOW. This author could possibly be as unstable and paranoid as one could get. Reading this hit piece can only lead one to lean be thrusted towards the conclusion that the author is mentally deranged. But I, like normal people, would have to get more evidence or perform a more in-depth analysis to reach a conclusive diagnosis. Ooops, I forgot, I am still using the Liberal methodology of deeming myself with superior knowledge of mental insight as to the motive of this author. I can read one pathetic viewpoint, then conclude this author is totally evil and should be impeached from his profession. But yes, that is just my opinion and don't feel the need to iterate more on the subject. Unless Fee Dee would care to chime in, then I would gladly debate the merits or mental state of this author. That's just the civil thing to do.

All very sane and coherent tweets. Now the author's senility might be in question due to his comical and enormously exaggerated conclusion of Trump's mental state based on these tweets. Like any sane person, I would not venture to offer a clinical diagnosis based on such scant evidence, but that doesn't seem to stop the Liberals from doing it. And what's more hilarious is that some will even try to regurgitate the said fake news. The snowflake meltdown continues. I almost feel ashamed for the perpetual grin on my face since Trump won the Presidency.

I got through the first couple of minutes because Melania was the focus. After that I had to shut it down. And if you can't watch Ainsley for six minutes, well, I wouldn't know what to say. I'm guessing the common factor in our aversion to watching this video is not Melania, Ainsley, or FoxNews.

I'm not enamored or even impressed with your comprehension skills, so I don't consider that a compliment. And you need some semblance of content knowledge for the condescending attitude to be effective. Please outline your list of unusual behaviors. I would love to see what you consider proof of instability and paranoia. I would say I double-dare you but I don't want to sink into such childishness. Oh wait, I'm employing the Liberal form of engagement anyway...I double-dare you to reveal your true feelings and expose your analytical skills on diagnosing psychological disorders. I hope it is a lot better than the garbage you posted later in the thread. That one was just laughable.

Wow, I read the first two "lies", and frankly would be embarrassed to have my name on a post that had a link to that garbage. The first one: Sean Hannity actually showed a clip of Trump saying we shouldn't go into Iraq. This clip was shot before the invasion date. So your reporter lied. The second one: Trump said "I THINK we have the all-time record...", and your reporter calls that a lie. Trump didn't lie, he said what he thought to be true. A lie is when you say something you know to be untrue, such as "If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor" or "If you like your healthcare plan you can keep your healthcare plan". Such petulance is just absolutely pathetic, and your reporter seems to have a hard time telling the truth. The fact that you even put this link up for viewing shows your true character. And it's declining with every post.

Where in the video did he admit creating fake news? Please give me the timestamp, as I do not wish to sit through that whole thing.

How can we have a whole post about sunglasses without mentioning anything about my favorite kind, the kind ZZ Top devoted a whole song to....Cheap Sunglasses!

And this response typifies your limited knowledge and ability to analyze rational thought? Do you actually think that "the wall" and the travel ban are the be-all end-all methods that will solve all problems? Only someone that has very limited (and I'm being generous) cognitive skills could follow that line of thought. If you have bald tires on your vehicle, do you actually think buying a new set of tires will prevent all car accidents? Would you be out complaining...these new tires will not prevent a head-on collision, so I might as well just keep my old worn out tires? Thankfully that line of thinking has vacated the White House and now the adults are in charge.

That is pathetic. According to every psychologist and psychiatrist (and every other sane person), Gartner is a delusional nut-case if he thinks he can make a diagnosis like this. And you are not the only one that thinks something is wrong with the President. That is abundantly clear in the non-stop entertainment world of Liberal meltdowns. The problem is that when confronted to provide evidence for these delusional behaviors, y'all have nothing....just childish temper-tantrums. That is why I asked you to provide proof of your assertions that Trump was unstable and paranoid. And all you can come up with is "Trump accused Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower" or "I don't have to provide proof". It is clear for everyone to see you are being as petty as the rest of your party. I'm torn...while it's very sad it's just darn comical at the same time. The once mighty Democrat party that championed themselves as the party for common folk, has sunken to the depths of petty temper-tantrums, hissy fits, and safe spaces filled with crayons and Play-doh. And for what? You tell me who is paranoid and delusional.

I guess we'll have to wait for the Liberal responses until their leaders can formulate a response. I'm sure it will contain the terms "fake news", "witch hunt", "collusion", and/or "Russian interference"

Who are these uneducated folks you speak of? Who do you think started the phase? And when? And better yet, why?

So when people call Trump an orange, paranoid, unbalanced, racist, homophobic, idiotic, mentally disturbed, incompetent, misogynist, deplorable, liar, stooge, Putin love child, xenophobic, adulterer, etc., and someone asks for proof of these claims, you take that to mean we are defending him? And who has defended him when he has been wrong? Please give an example of this (even though history has shown you won't defend your comments).

I'll go back an look, but paranoid was one. There were many others. You Liberals are so in lock step with the talking points it's hard to remember. And thanks for the compliment. Your analysis so far has been completely and utterly ridiculous to the point that I would feel any praise by you would be worrisome.

I think that study was conducted by Captain Obvious. And Seattle can't say they weren't warned. I'm guessing their elitist mentality got in the way of good judgement, which often seems to be the case with Liberals.

Your earlier statements on this subject said that Trump was a supreme racist for even suggesting this executive order...or did you forget.

To what?

Have you really gone so senile as to cut and paste your own ridiculous post? He did nothing when the Russians hacked every branch of our military. Read a book. You look like a fool taking up for the worst president in American history, then denigrating the current president while refusing to give any supporting evidence. (And I don't even like Trump, but he sure knows how the bring out the Liberal true colors.)

And I'm just trying to get you to defend your comments. You must be getting acrophobia from that perch you've set yourself upon. It is amazing that you can utter such childish comments then have the nerve to say you are trying to teach me something. Keep commenting, them true colors are starting to get blinding.

Calling Trump every name in the book with no supporting evidence. Are you really that dense? Scratch that, I'm still laughing at the "double dare" comment to realize that was a stupid question.

How come you haven't answered any of my questions? Are you so embarrassed to realize you are a Liberal sheeple that you can't even defend your statements, just like the other Liberals chiming in. Are you really so desperate for attention that you feel the need to comment on others conversations but run from direct questions. Most people feel embarrassment and shame for dodging questions. What is it about Liberals that seem to be void of basic shameful emotions? It must be that superiority holier than thou attitude that seems to inoculate you from certain shame. You are supposedly an RN. Is this some new drug recently developed?

That's not even a good try. You are venturing into new tobie territory. Sorry your feelings are hurt, but don't come on here in attack mode expecting not to be challenged. Maybe you can get away with that on FaceBook, I don't know (I don't get on it). That seems to be a safe space for many, especially those with thin skin.

And this relates to anything how? You must be feeling guilty for your feeble attempts at condescension and superiority when trying to label someone, then feel the need to attack to cover up your guilt. Just keep posting. Your true colors are showing with every post. Your focus on me is certainly telling, given the fact that I am the one that called you out when you shamefully labeled a man with zero supporting evidence. You can't defend your posts so you lash out at the messenger. It's an old and tiresome tactic that this board has seen too often. But feel free to keep up the "kill the messenger" tactic. It is obvious and amusing.

I'm curious as to when you will admit Obama meddled in the Israeli elections.