Englebert

And you claim you are not a hateful person. The 1st graders are getting their daily laugh. Even they can see the bile spewing from your mouth is the product of the hate festering in your brain.

Can you name anything these mythical KKK mobs have destroyed in the name of "White Power" in the last 50 years? Your equivalency example is like saying both men and women commit rape. (Thank you Ann Coulter) Technically correct, but nowhere near the same. And I don't trust anything coming out of the mouths of the Southern Poverty Law Center. The stats might as well have come from the Huffington Post.

Facts show that statement to be complete false. Liberals say they are open to new ideas, but will result to rioting and destruction when that "new idea" doesn't conform to their warped sense of values. Exactly in the same way that Liberals say they are inclusive, but will boot your butt out and resort to violence if you don't conform to their warped sense of values. Exactly like they say they are tolerant, but will resort to violence against anyone they deem to exhibit behavior contrary to their warp sense of values. They say they are open, tolerant and inclusive, but only if you totally capitulate to their agenda. The evidence is abundant and evident to any sane person. You have to be a lot nutty to think otherwise when the evidence is so overwhelming, but for some strange reason I still like you.

I have never heard of the definition (that I recall) until just a little while ago. I haven't thought about it much. But I don't believe I've ever heard of a Liberal or Democrat that advocates for free market capitalism. I have never heard of one that believes government programs, even those ripe with fraud, should be eliminated or even scaled back. All I have ever heard from the Left is that the government, especially the Federal government, is the one that should be solving all of our problems, though to different degrees. So just a cursory analysis of the definition is not something I would agree with as a definition of more than just a small minority of people, but would have to give it more thought to give an answer. But in the end it is just a label.

I make a distinction between Progressive Liberals and Democrats. What I call Democrats fit more in line with that Classical Liberalism definition. I hate Liberals because of their holier than thou attitudes, intolerance, hatred, exclusiveness, childishness, lawlessness, blatant hypocrisy, but most of all, their "ends justify the means" mantra.

Would you care to explain this post? I have zero clue as to what you are insinuating. I don't want to shoot down your post until I understand what your accusations are, but I'm confident it's the worn out "whoa is me" and "I'm so oppressed" strategy. Wasn't you the one that said you would have taken George Zimmerman's gun and beaten him with it?

I agree with this one also. They are afraid of the spin the Liberal media will put on the repeal. The Liberals will speak of millions of people that will die because of the Republicans. It's not so much the lie, it is the fact that they know the Liberal sheeple will believe the lie. You know this.

I have no doubt about that.

Hey, we agree on something.

Start a charity then. You aren't taking up for the less fortunate, you are advocating for the destruction of the greatest healthcare system the world has ever known. You preach that sanctimonious attitude with little realization that you are hurting the poor, and everyone else. Let me know when you practice what you preach, and I will gladly donate to your charity organization designed to help the poor.

And the meltdown continues.

And the meltdown continues. I didn't like Trump when he was a Republican candidate, almost to the point of hating him. Once he got the nomination, I held my nose and voted for him, just to vote against Hillary. Now that I've seen his ability to bring out the true colors of Liberals, I love the man. Posts like this bring a smile to my face. Thank you Trump for paving the way for Liberals to out themselves as the truly hateful, spiteful, intolerant deplorables that we knew they were.

I don't have to read it to know that it is garbage. But it is refreshing to see them acting somewhat like adults, even though they should realize they are killing the best healthcare system this world has ever seen. When voting on the Bill, I wonder if the Republicans will huddle around the voting machine singing "Yes we can"?

Yep, that's the interpretation I'm predicting also. I bet we hear "Trump hates poor people" for at least 4 more years (hopefully 8 years). I would also bet this line will splinter to "Republicans hate poor people". Of course, that's already a prevalent theme from Liberals.

Yes, it does make sense.

So if you don't know what was in the emails, I'm assuming most Liberals don't know either. The mainstream media "shockingly" didn't cover the story, so I'm curious how people can think that this hack had any influence on the election. FoxNews ran stories on the content of the emails, but these were already Trump voters.

No, I'm asking if you have a problem with Podesta's emails being published on WikiLeaks, the emails that have been proven as 100% authentic and unedited. I'll also ask you if you have a problem with Russia hacking our servers. If so, why weren't you as upset when they hacked into every government department, including each branch of our military? And if the Russians hacked servers, this was done under the Obama watch. So if you are upset about the hacks, shouldn't you be upset at Obama? Why is Russian hacks of the DNC causing all kinds of outrage when the same hacks of our military barely received a peep from the Liberal media?

And these are the same people that insist Man-Made Global Warming is caused by Man and is destroying our planet. These same people claim this is FACT. Comey has already admitted to leaking information about Trump, so it is just as likely that he himself hacked the DNC and leaked the emails.

No, it is not. The FBI said it was fact, be recent events have shown the heads of the FBI to be political hacks and not to be trusted. These so-called "facts" might be just that, but I have no reason to believe the FBI on political issues, especially when they refused to show any evidence as to why the reached their conclusion. But let's say it is a fact that Russia hacked the DNC, the released emails were 100% authentic, unedited emails. So the American voter was treated to factual information. Do you have a problem with that?

Russia is being blamed for hacking the DNC, but real evidence has shown that Podesta was the victim of a phishing scheme which could have been pulled off by a kid in high school. But the real story behind this theory is that the emails published on WikiLeaks were 100% authentic, unedited emails. Do you have a problem with people learning factual information? I would not be upset in the least if factual emails from Trump were released. Do you feel the Podesta emails should have been deemed "classified"? (If so, then we could have just gotten them off of Hillary's server.)

So in a previous post when I stated that "I would be in favor of an investigation if we had any shred of evidence" you interpreted that as me being scared of an investigation? Really? That deserves one of your obligatory LOLs. And yes I do know how the "interference" affected voters. It didn't. You can't even state what the interference was. Please let your imagination run wild and see if you can dream up some scenarios of how the Russians could have possibly influenced voters. The only theory I've heard so far, and from unnamed sources of course, is that Russia disseminated fake news. And of course no examples were given. But if true, how is this any different than what both sides did, although far more fake news oozed from the Left.

I wish I would have bought some. I finished the last of my Nicks' boudain a couple of weeks ago, and have been meaning to go get some more.

And the FBI has offered zero evidence and said that not one vote was changed due to Russian "interference". So the only investigation that needs to be done is to investigate the FBI. The first question I would have is define exactly what was done to be labeled as "interference", and show how all-of-a-sudden this is any different than what they have done in all of the presidential elections in the past 80 years. It's an easy question to answer...fake outrage. And this investigation is being conducted only to appease the sheeple that are being led by the Liberal/Socialist party (formerly known as the Democrat party). Shutting it down would in all likelihood, no definitely, spur ridiculous conspiracy theories from every mainstream media outlet, not to mention the crap that would emanate from far Left propaganda sites. The sheeple will predictable fall for it and we very well could see rioting in many major cities across the U.S.

Why do we need an investigation? You and the Liberals have nothing, nada, not one shred of evidence, but you are in favor of spending millions, possibly billions on a witch hunt. I would be in favor of an investigation if we had something more than just some unnamed sources with secret allegations. And it's absolutely pathetic that we have to spend money on this when we couldn't even get a special prosecutor for Hillary and her email/Benghazi scandals, which had all kinds of real evidence.

Wow, how confused or condescending can you get? Nobody with two functioning brain cells would think a travel ban would prevent all attacks. I think you know that, so I'm guessing you were just trying to be condescending. I guess we shouldn't do research on new types of road surfaces and tire tread because this would not prevent all car wrecks. Or maybe we should stop Cancer research because it would not prevent all deaths. Here's the better question: Who thinks a travel ban would be beneficial in helping to prevent some future attacks?