Jump to content

UT alum

Members
  • Posts

    3,647
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

UT alum last won the day on July 20 2025

UT alum had the most liked content!

About UT alum

  • Birthday 03/30/1954

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Silsbee
  • Interests
    Reading, fishing, gardening, politics

Recent Profile Visitors

9,663 profile views
  1. The Senate discredited it by finding NO EVIDENCE of fraud as a result of its investigation. That photo has been discredited so many times it’s useless. The Supreme Court just ruled 7-2 Trump cannot tamper with mail in voting. All three of his appointees voted with the majority NO EVIDENCE!!! By the way, I took the vaccine 4 times. Zero side effects, no COVID. I know people who did not take the vaccine and died. Get used to people disagreeing with you if you’re gonna ride the conspiracy train.
  2. This is a superb example of why we shouldn’t believe everything we read (especially on the web). Those numbers were given in the Senate testimony of one Jesse Binall. It was discredited and never proven. NO EVIDENCE! Try again. [Hidden Content]
  3. He didn’t write it and wasn’t quoted in it. You can shoot the messenger but that don’t change the facts in Nevada.
  4. You keep on scrambling there, podnuh. That ain’t evidence. It’s a bunch of accusations leveled by Trump’s (not ours) DOJ in an attempt to open an investigation. Roll on, brother, roll on. Keep throwing’ them snake eyes. [Hidden Content]
  5. There is evidence of fraud in every one of those programs listed. There is zero evidence of statistically significant fraud in our elections. NO EVIDENCE!.
  6. I saw that “blame it on Biden” coming from three blocks away. Today three of them, one appointed by W, kicked the mail in scheme to the curb, unanimously.
  7. The New York Times? A very reliable source when they write things you like, huh? Kind of like elections aren’t fair unless you win.
  8. Okay Pee Wee. I know you are, so what am I? Appeals court just upheld injunction against federal interference in states’ mail in ballot rules. The judges said, “The government also hasn’t shown evidence of past fraud to justify restrictions.”
  9. Just as I suspected. No evidence. Just another sling at the wall. It won’t stick. If true, it wouldn’t be communist. It would be authoritarian. Communism is an economic system. Authoritarianism in a governance system. Get your terms straight.
  10. Because we understood that supply chain disruption caused by the global pandemic was largely to blame. Classic supply/demand inflation. This round of inflation, Yosemite Sam shot both feet.
  11. Produce the evidence. A link to any evidence. Any court findings? I think not. 0-20. No evidence. The USA conducts the safest elections in the world. To suggest otherwise is un-American.
  12. If you’re in favor of voting suppression. There is no evidence that voting by mail has ever contributed to statistically measurable fraud. You, my friend, are anti-democracy.
  13. They also support reduction in food support for babies, diminished healthcare for babies, reduction in childcare support for babies, etc., etc., etc., ad infinitum. That’s not hypocrisy, it is cruelty.
  14. As inflation eats wage gains… [Hidden Content]
×
×
  • Create New...