UT alum

What are you asking me for? The Supreme Court said that the President can’t override the Constitution at his whim. Whether or not a tariff based Federal economic system is wise will be proved out by time, not courts.

I dint care what he does. I live in Texas.

Oh yeah, it will. Now he’ll have to follow rules and/or or work with Congress. No more dictatorial moves, and little Donnie doesn’t play well with others.

I listened to his lying mouth to my ear. Money wasn’t addressed because that was t the cause of action. How many times I have to tell you? I don’t watch talking heads.

The other means have too many strings. That’s why he went the IEEPA way. The 10% across the board he spoke of can only be in effect for 150 days, requiring congressional permission to extend beyond that time. Trump don’t like to ask permission.

The lawsuit was not about money. It was about authority. No court can rule on issues not a part of the suit. Now the lawsuits will be about the return of ill gotten gains taken by nonexistent authority.

So full of grace and dignity. NOT “I was a good boy”. That line speaks encyclopedic volumes.

Does that mean 12.3 million arrests for fraud? Those numbers mean nothing without documentation. Mini Me lies as bad as his daddy.

I like cartoons.

And Robert Kennedy never was a doctor or scientist. What’s your point?

How do you know the signs didn’t have any effect? Subliminal thought is real.

You completely missed my point. In junior high kids “love” someone who favors them, then will turn around and “hate” them when disfavored. I was referring to political immaturity. So yes, anyone in junior high would have understood your post.

I don’t know. 25 or 30 percent left on the bone will leave enough meat for a little competition.

Yes, I would, but not for the reasons you think. The more conservative the commentary on tariffs, the louder the protest against them has been. Allowing such an egregious violation of executive powers would have confirmed them as a kangaroo court. I can handle conservatives, lapdogs I cannot.

What is your deal? This isn’t junior high. This is a victory for the Constitution and affirmation that the court will interpret it collectively. I may not agree with all their interpretations, but this is strong evidence that they will not serve as lapdogs to the Executive branch.