UT alum

If that’s true, explain this. [Hidden Content]

You want names, too? [Hidden Content]

You want names? [Hidden Content]

Good point. I think as many as 40-45 ex staffers and cabinet members have voiced their opposition to his candidacy. Why do you find it surprising that any of his supporters would be alarmed at anything pertaining to him? The true believers see Trump as infallible.

You’re citing a bookie? That takes the cake! Very scientific and reliable. That want your money. Take that bet!

To declare I can’t win a debate without insults implies I do win them with insults. Am I being too mean?

How about sanctimonious? That too ugly?

Snowflake.

This place is rife with them. Only the liberals get called out.

She was elected, not promoted. That “race crap” is very effective with certain “very good people”. Sounds like you’re one of them.

Call girl? She’s got a rap sheet proving that, I suppose. You see, that’s why it’s misogyny. Trump can have divorces, civil judgements for sexual assault, pornstar payoffs, peep at beauty contestants and it’s okay because he’s a male. Trump is a disgrace.

Again, no context. Photos taken in an approved setting can be used. Teeing one up just to get votes is not an approved setting. I don’t see McCain smiling with a thumbs up. Trump is a disgrace.

Yes, taking a photo out of context and inserting your own interpretation is really bad.

She had an admitted affair with Willie Brown in the early nineties. To morph that into her being a “ho” who slept her way to the top is racist misogyny. How else could a non-white woman reach such lofty heights?

I think it was the one where he was talking to law enforcement officers in Wisconsin.

I saw them do it.

He was one of the trickle down dudes, right? Laffable. I believe he was one of the tricklers, not the trickled. Reagan may have filled the coffers, but he emptied them faster. Piled up biggest debt in history to that time. So, who’s to say that increased government spending wasn’t one of the drivers of the growth achieved during his two terms?

Here you go. First off, you gonna lead with Roger Stone using a Tucker Carlson trick and expect to be taken seriously? Second, FOX isn’t covering his rallies without cutting away when the geriatric rants start. So, he’s not getting much coverage from them. You’re backing a loser. Accept it.

It’s called misogyny.

I wasn’t using the Bible to prop up anything. If you don’t find the contradiction ironic, counter it. You can’t. You’re a stone thrower. I try to live by the new commandments that came with fulfillment of the law.

Got scripture to back that up?

Because they are poor. The defenseless can’t punish back. Jesus placed high priority on the poor. He also said that the poor would always be with us. Quite the conundrum for our “Christian” nation, eh?

Tell me this. What would the “drivers” do without a labor force? You don’t want unions. That’d give too much to the “takers”. You favor wage suppression, then as an insult, hike their taxes too so the “drivers” can make even more.

Yeah, like Harding, Coolidge, Hoover. Trump fits right in there.

That is not what I said, and I see no value is trying to explain it further. As for the WLT Report, “it looks intentional to me”? That is not reporting. Unless you’re Tucker Carlson, and he’s not a reporter. More fascist propaganda. No proof, only suspicious conjecture. Disgraceful.