Meadows was offered immunity for testimony in documents case and January 6 case. Are you saying that is fake reporting?
Meadows was held in contempt of Congress for ignoring a supbpoena to testify in the second impeachment trial. Are you saying that is a lie?
If there was nothing to turn on, why would he, or any other witness but especially he - the closest person to him on a day to day basis by job description - need immunity? That’s not fake news. That’s what they call logic.
I’m not relying on anyone else’s opinion. I’m taking facts recorded in the public record and drawing my own conclusions. You oughtta try it. It’s a lot more productive than listening to someone else tell me whatvthey think about it. I can think for myself. At the end of the day, I’ll be proved either right or wrong.