Jump to content

UT alum

Members
  • Posts

    2,638
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by UT alum

  1. I’d say the Supreme Court justices are constitutional scholars. Do you agree with all of them?
  2. So, what, government employees should have no political affiliation? Shouldn’t vote? Or is it just a question of who supports who? Trump actually called on Bill Barr publicly to indict Joe Biden when he was president. But that wasn’t election interference in your world because it was Trump. Now, without Biden even saying a word, Justice is interfering because it’s Your Man.
  3. Viktor Orban? Really?You don’t want individual freedom. You want a strong man. The irony in you implying I’m a sheep is almost incomprehensible.
  4. It’s not about the money. What he doesn’t have enough of is attention.
  5. You can cherry pick cases all you’d like. I don’t have any idea how many he has tried. You’re right about one thing. I wouldn’t want him on my team we’re I accused of murder. HE’S A FREAKIN’ PROSECUTOR’
  6. Guess you didn’t listen to the rating agency’s reasons. One of the main ones is national division and cracks seen in our belief in our institutions. Things Donald Trump is accused of. Financial markets hate instability, and for the first time in a long time economic indicators play a secondary role. @Cardinalbacker @biggirl
  7. “Most” was supposed to be “does not”.
  8. Black people voted Democrat way before Trump. One deluded person does most speak for an entire group, unless his name is Donald Trump.
  9. Dershowitz doesn’t want to lose his cushy little gig with Rupert. He’s pathetic.
  10. As you want it. One man rule.
  11. A vote for Trump is a vote against The Constitution and the rule of law
  12. “He said” don’t get it with me unless it’s under oath. Smith may have testimony showing Team Rudy’s trove of documents to be lies. The Gateway Pundit is a propaganda factory anyway.
  13. You didn’t teach anything to me. No would have sufficed (though the question was asked rhetorically).
  14. Great! If there’s exculpatory evidence out there, I’d love to see it. Haven’t seen a shred yet, but if Jack is as dumb as you say, oughtta be a snap.
  15. That’s a mighty long answer. You could have just said no.
  16. Did you read any of the Mueller Report? Either of the two Federal indictments? You’ve drunk so much Trump kool-aid, you got to be orange.
  17. There was mucho evidence of obstruction of Justice.
  18. That is a complete and total lie. That woman is not a member of a DOD task force. She’s shown talking before one. She used to be the Vice President of this outfit called Republicans Overseas. She’s just another Trump shill. About as bad as Sydney Powell.
  19. Look, dude, the Mueller Report cited ten possible violations of law but would not pursue because of his status as sitting President. He was not exonerated. He used the DOJ through AG Barr to misrepresent and obfuscate the situation because his mental illness will not allow him to consider the possibility that he has ever done wrong in his life.
  20. Smith wouldn’t have brought the suit if he was scared of discovery. I’m more interested in hearing answers given under oath in a court of law.
  21. Conspiracy theorist =Someone who has no idea or even curiosity about the concept of sociology and the laws and customs that bind societies. If it doesn’t fit their world view, anything opposing that view must be a dishonest manipulation of of their reality. More like lemmings than sheep.
  22. Just like you do The New York Times. Quite tiring, indeed.
×
×
  • Create New...