UT alum

Did you read any of the Mueller Report? Either of the two Federal indictments? You’ve drunk so much Trump kool-aid, you got to be orange.

This lady? [Hidden Content]

There was mucho evidence of obstruction of Justice.

That is a complete and total lie. That woman is not a member of a DOD task force. She’s shown talking before one. She used to be the Vice President of this outfit called Republicans Overseas. She’s just another Trump shill. About as bad as Sydney Powell.

I’m laughing at you.

Look, dude, the Mueller Report cited ten possible violations of law but would not pursue because of his status as sitting President. He was not exonerated. He used the DOJ through AG Barr to misrepresent and obfuscate the situation because his mental illness will not allow him to consider the possibility that he has ever done wrong in his life.

Smith wouldn’t have brought the suit if he was scared of discovery. I’m more interested in hearing answers given under oath in a court of law.

Right.

Conspiracy theorist =Someone who has no idea or even curiosity about the concept of sociology and the laws and customs that bind societies. If it doesn’t fit their world view, anything opposing that view must be a dishonest manipulation of of their reality. More like lemmings than sheep.

Just like you do The New York Times. Quite tiring, indeed.

I see no comment on the unanimous vote to confirm.

No, I didn’t. See my reply to LumRaider above.

I heard the argument. It’s lawyer BS. The investigation started over a year ago. A grand jury voted to bring charges based on the evidence collected over that time, not the DOJ. Citizens chosen at random saw the DOJ evidence and voted to indict. Seems Trump would be anxious to want to prove his innocence he so brazenly proclaims and get on with the election. He’s acting like a guilty person, most an innocent one.

If it was, you can bet Breitbart used it out of context. I believe nothing they say.

She was approved by a 95-0 vote in the Senate. That’s as bipartisan as it gets. I’m not even going to read the Liberty Daily. That’s a propaganda publication from a highly partisan, highly conservative evangelical zealot.

Breitbart is BS, not legitimate journalism.

It’s not about his speech. It’s his actions.

Well, then, your man need not worry. I wonder why Raffensberger didn’t think of that during the “perfect” phone call. Why wasn’t that one of the suits to begin with when trying to prove election fraud? Sounds like election denier spin to me.

You’re a demented lunatic.

Here’s the twelve pound sledgehammer. The Orange Man is going down. I’ll guarantee you Meadows will be the star witness.

That wasn’t criminal prosecution.

James Comer says? I believe that’s called heresay, and is inadmissible as evidence. Show me some transactions.

They gonna have to call John Henry before too long.

FAKE NEWS!

I couldn’t read it without giving them my email. That’s a sign of an illegitimate propaganda site, not a real news organization.