UT alum

Trump loss more assured than victory.

Not necessarily that Biden wins. Trump loses.

Republicans had both houses of Congress for Obama’s last six years, why didn’t they come up with anything in their oversight capacity?

Wanna bet?

Chasing corruption, just like Trump, eh?

I would say more like embellish, convoluted, and misdirecting. He’s not a reporter. Just another talking head with an opinion.

Look, get real for a minute. Six Trump campaign associates convicted in 3 years on various corruption charges. Two cabinet members resign amid ethics violations. Obama presidency ethics or corruption violations = 0. You can believe whatever you want, but that won’t change the truth.

I know ‘em when I see ‘em.

No, Rudy’s going to the pen. Trump’s leaving office by 2021 and Biden will be president. Obama in on Biden’s scheme. That’s cute.

Yeah, I’d rather see him testifying in federal district court trying to explain his Ukrainian connection. Schiff can’t send him to the pen.

Did you not see my post discerning the difference between that and what Trump has done?

No, both sides manipulate it to keep us at odds to sell advertising. I believe good reporting exists, one just must be vigilant of one’s sources.

That is so weak. My statement about under oath was whether a statement of fact is more believable made by someone under oath, or someone not. When no one is under oath, I judge for myself what I believe to be credible. The way you twist logic, man, you should open a pretzel shop.

Then why is dept. of justice department not on it? That’s where the investigation of that allegation belongs. Go back to sleep.

Jeez, dude, the right’s whole agenda rests on the premise that every source that does not follow its narrative is fake news. That discredits many sources. How can you make a point that is at odds with itself?

[Hidden Content] L Todd Wood has zero credibility in my book, conspiracy theory racist. Is that the best you can do to smear Biden?

What is your source for that? Alex Jones?

You are mistaken. Prosecutor was supposedly doing these things, but really wasn’t. US wanted to see someone in the position who would really stand up to the oligarchs. Again, trying to further US policy, not their own.

The problem is, if Vice President Biden and President Obama did any strong arming, it was done trying to support official US foreign policy of seeking to reduce corruption in Ukraine. Trump’s strong arming was to support his own personal agenda, not stated US foreign policy.

I sincerely hope you get your wish, but I’m afraid Rudy will take the fifth by not honoring any subpoena. Isn’t it the least bit curious that those closest to Trump, the ones in a position to blast these accusations out of the water, are refusing to come forth? Spin that one for me, guys.

What are you even talking about?

As long as they suppress free elections in their country, and have a foreign policy that seeks to promote the same in other countries, yeah, that makes up my kind

Did you choke on those words as you tapped them in?

Hey dumbass, he was asking her, as a witness, how that might make future witnesses feel. “Intimidated”, she said. I don’t like using pejoratives, but your use of the term to describe Schiff for making a point you obviously didn’t get could not stand.

Assuming they strong armed - where was the personal political gain? They were trying to carry out US policy of rooting out corruption in Ukraine to increase the odds that their democracy could succeed. Trump acts only for Trump.