UT alum

The evidence is prima facie. No special knowledge required.

Debate appears to be a dead language.

Yup.

Trump is incompetent.

And who might that be? Edgar Cayce or Jeanne Dixon?

I do know what I’m talking about, we just don’t agree. Hide and watch on the China deal. Xi’s gonna play him.

It’s the fault of a nation, not a party. Good grief. I don’t see all issues as “us” vs. “them”.

The races have been divided since 1787. C’mon man, at least acknowledge our country’s history.

No, it is not the goal of either party’s leadership. Moscow Mitch was the first, at least in the modern era, to openly state such a goal. I don’t hate trump. I think he is grossly under qualified for the position he holds, especially where foreign relations are concerned, making the leader of the free world a national security risk. Sad.

I just read this. That’s about the most bulls**t comparison I’ve yet seen. From ‘41 - ‘45 our country was almost 100% united. President Obama’s term began with the senate majority leader, Moscow Mitch McConnel announcing his number one priority in his position was, what? His constituents? No. It was to make Obama a one term president. Good things happen when the United States are united. trump is what happens when we’re not. What’s gonna be his contribution? 150 yards of fence?

There have been several subpoenas issued for White House testimony and documents that have been either ignored or challenged. Zero cooperation. As for double standards, neither party has a monopoly on that. Republicans are acting like the Democrats did during Clinton investigation, and vice-versa.

Why is stonewalling ok to you for trump, but big crime for Biden? If Biden doesn’t comply, he’s hiding something, if trump doesn’t comply it’s....what?

2007 percent was the proper interval, not 2008.

Yeah, but looking back, I’ve found myself better off after each 4 year interval as far back as I can remember, save 2008. Speaking for myself, America’s been great for as long as I’ve been alive.

In light of the emails turned up over the weekend, I’d say further questioning is warranted.

Politics. Setting that all aside for a moment, I do wish you and yours a Merry Christmas, Stevenash.

That’s why Mulvaney, Bolton, and the two OMB guys need to be heard. They were the most directly involved. If they say nothing, then it’s lights out and Trump is acquitted. I just want to see if they say nothing under oath.

Merry Christmas, NetCat!

Let’s set this all aside for a moment, like the combatants did on Christmas Day, 1914. Merry Christmas!

All that aside, Merry Christmas to you and your loved ones, BS Wildcats.

All that aside, LumRaiderFan, Merry Christmas!

All that aside, Baddog, Merry Christmas to you and yours.

That ain’t in the way the Constitution reads. Article I, sec.2, clause 5; Article l, sec. 3, clauses 6 & 7; Article 2, sec. 2; Article 2, sec. 4. That’s all that’s said in the Constitution about impeachment. Tell me how any of that puts a time constraint on delivery of the articles of impeachment.

I believe the Constitution says that the Senate shall have the power to try all impeachments. Don’t say jack about how the House has to go about delivering the articles, other than they be physically delivered to the Senate.

Direct testimony is not circumstantial.