UT alum

He’s never been political in his adult life. He was a soldier, a prosecutor, and appointed FBI director by a Republican and re-appointed by a Democrat. Your hatred blinds you.

He will,at trial. I believe the Chief Justice will have a say about each witness’ relevance to the case.

He will, at trial. I believe the Chief Justice has a say in the witness’ relevance to the case.

Let us hear from Mulvaney, Bolton, Giuliani, hell, young Biden for that matter. Why clam up if you’re innocent? I believe I’ve heard trump speak quite disparagingly about those who take the fifth.

Mueller said if he could have reasonably declared the president broke no law, he would have said it. He didn’t.

Murder is beyond shadow of doubt.

That’s it. Not, beyond the shadow of a doubt.

He had every chance to provide all the exculpatory evidence and testimony he wanted. He didn’t because he can’t.

[Hidden Content] circumstantial evidence can be enough to convict.

Do you not understand whistleblower laws?

Sure. But the circumstantial I’ve seen is overwhelming. I should have said answer his accusers.

Secret whistleblower is a redundancy. Trump will have due process at trial. If he has witnesses who can exonerate him, he can call them. He will have the right of cross-examination.

“What about” Holder? I don’t believe Washington was ever subpoenaed.

Accused does not have right to present witnesses in a Grand Jury proceeding.

Where’d you get that?

In American jurisprudence, if the accused doesn’t comply with subpoenas, they go to jail.

Whatever. Same scheisse, second verse, same as the first.

Can you cite any of those stimulating deregulations?

He would be destroying his way of life in the process.

That is a lie.

Not entirely. The White House refused both documents and testimony from relevant witnesses.

Opposite.

To be ensure a fair trial. Fair trials have witnesses and evidence. Impeachment hearings were not a trial.

HE CALLS HIMSELF ONE!

And Ari Fleischer is? Only time will tell what this all will bring.