UT alum

Not when it’s the President. Any President.

How do you know what you don’t know? Sounds like the remark of an inquisitor.

Like, what’s his net worth? How financially leveraged is he? Who finances his debt?

IRS speaks to tax law, not ethics.

So?

We can afford her insurance. If it weren’t for the Democratic Party there would be no social security to argue about. As for taxes, I paid in excess of $25K income tax for a good many years, plus matches for my employees’ social security for 30 years. Don’t whine about that to me.

What’d the IRS do?

The hypocrisy of the right is astounding.

I was referring to Trump, not Carson.

My wife has a pre-existing condition. For people like that, price is a secondary consideration. But for ACA, she’d have no coverage today, as we lost our group coverage when I retired.

Because he didn’t want to. Why should that bother you?

Metaphorically, yes.

No one has had to be forced. They volunteered. It’s called transparency. As for requirements, check Section 6103 (f) (1) and (2) of the tax code.

Carter, Reagan, Bush l, Clinton, Bush ll, Obama. Obama’s birth certificate was questioned only by those seeking to delegitimize his presidency, his successor being chief among them.

Thank you for your bravery in posting that in here. Kings have always despised courts and judges they could not control.

ACA was not disastrous and the money you refer to were Iranian assets frozen in our banks.

Frickin’ word police. I don’t believe defective is a pejorative.

He’s using the same tactic as climate change deniers. Around 92 or so percent of black people think he’s a racist, but you’ll believe the tiny minority of opinion if it makes your guy ( or issue) look good. I got to give it to him, though. He’s a prime grade toady

At least offer an alternative. Mass transit reduces traffic congestion.

He may not have, but he kicked Moscow Mitch’s ass in getting his signature piece of legislation passed after that relic swore his number one goal as majority leader was to make Obama a one term president. Trump can’t even level an effective insult at Pelosi, let alone work the house to get any of his legislation passed. He’s not effective. He’s defective.

And thus, the argument for civil discourse is refuted.

But I can admit a mistake. I got you confused with baddog. Sorry ‘bout that.

Or maybe I should use Trump’s defense and you’ll accept that. “I didn’t say it, and if I did, that’s not what I meant, and even so, you in the echo chamber will never give me the credit I deserve no matter what.” that work?

There are exceptions to rules. I was reacting to another post referring to Schiff as a dumbass citing something the poster obviously misconstrued. I know subtlety is not a Trumper’s strong suit, so I understand your taking all name calling as insulting name calling. You weren’t trying to make a point when you called me a fool. You just used an insult to make yourself look smarter. Big difference there.