UT alum

What happened to love the sinner hate the sin?

Calling someone Godless is passing judgement.

Political theater

Bragging about doing what?

What’s your definition of a “high crime”?

Firing anyone who disagrees with you is unprincipled in my book. Public berating of anyone who disagrees with you is unprincipled. Labeling political opponents as traitors or enemies is unprincipled. Using a charity to funnel money into your campaign is unprincipled. Casting doubt and aspersions on public institutions is unprincipled for a Commander in Chief.

You know, Hagar, your judgement on people as Godless comes mighty close to the kind of judgement I thought the Almighty reserves for himself only. You’re treading on spiritually thin ice there, bub.

Did you not read about Trump’s charity? The man is unprincipled, and he holds office. I am indeed a Yellow Dog Democrat, whether it’s okay to say it or not.

Here we go again. What about Ford? That was recalling stuff from 30 years ago, so while it may of been her recollection, it was too long ago to be reliable. That doesn’t make her a liar. As for what about OJ, all I can say is, he was acquitted, so what difference does that make? Lastly, as for what about Zelensky, was he under oath? I think not.

That has been debunked. Besides, that would be a matter for Judicial, not the President. The president has no business using his personal attorney to circumvent the State Dept. on matters of national security. He used his office for personal political gain from a foreign government.

Also, do a little research on constitutional scholars interpretation of “high crimes”. They don’t have to be violations of criminal statutes to be so considered.

Dershowitz is a shameless self promoter. I believe him about like I believe Giuliani. Trump used our tax dollars to shake down Ukraine for personal political gain. Where’s the KGB in that? Why is just investigating it a witch hunt?

I believe sworn testimony. Why you think Sondland changed his tune?

Besides all that, grand jury investigation is part of due process. Trump hasn’t been denied it. Defendants aren’t allowed in a grand jury investigation. He’ll get the chance to present his evidence and cross examine his accusers when and if it goes to trial. Howling about due process jus sounds like someone who’s innocence is suspect. When you don’t have that facts on your side, attack the process.

Back at ya

You’re going to argue on principles? Your leader is the most unprincipled man to ever hold the office, hands down.

Keep them humanely with an effective system to reunite them when the legalities are settled.

Murder is against the law, so it’s not murder. Your decision to call it that doesn’t change the fact. “What about Obama?” There you go again. “What about” is all you can argue.

That may be true, but due process and procedures to reunite the family, or separate, depending on the underlying criminal charge exist for citizens. False equivalence, as usual, to try and draw a logical conclusion. That dog don’t hunt.

I don’t condemn murder. Can you cite the statute criminalizing a woman’s right to choose?

Did you read all of that Snopes post? Hardly an endorsement of Orange Hair’s policy. Can you point to examples of President Obama’s policies having no procedure, or making no attempt at reuniting the families? President Orangutan’s policy was, in effect, “screw ‘em”.

Another what about- ism. Apples aren’t oranges.

No less Godless than one who separates babies from parents and keeps them in cages. How long you wanna keep calling names?

No. It was a stupid thing to say, but that matters not since all Democrats are demons. I’m lumped in with all. The prejudice is sickening. Do your political arguments ever go beyond “what about-isms”?

That’s exactly the kind of crap that keeps me away. You don’t want honest discourse. How can you judge me Godless? How does your faith justify making a claim like that? The height of arrogance, the opposite of humility.