UT alum

Did you see the testimony?

As will Republicans overplay it.

There’s that “what about?” again...

How about Fiona Hill? You listen to her?

Putin quoted on Wednesday: ”Thank God no one is accusing us of interfering in the US elections anymore. Now they’re accusing Ukraine”. As reported by Business Insider. Game, set, match. Trump double faulted on match point. The boy threw the match for The Man. That oughtta make you guys mighty proud.

Did you see Fiona Hill testify yesterday?

Did you watch Fiona Hill testify yesterday?

Prejudge, prejudge. I laughed when she lost. Ran a very lame campaign. AIG! Trump OUT 2020!!!

I heard Hunter Biden was deep cover for the US government helping to uncover Ukrainian corruption because Lutsenko was too corrupt to do it himself. Why do you think Joe was after his ass? Hunter had the intel! A true patriot! I forget the name of the obscure website I uncovered it on, but it wasn’t mainstream, so it can’t be fake news, right?

No, he’s a talk show host, just like Hannity and Co.

Donald Trump’s whole life is nothing but an invitation to smear. I fear he thrives on smear. He’s the king of smear. So, cry on, cry on.

That was then. Hear Sondland yet today?

Trump loss more assured than victory.

Not necessarily that Biden wins. Trump loses.

Republicans had both houses of Congress for Obama’s last six years, why didn’t they come up with anything in their oversight capacity?

Wanna bet?

Chasing corruption, just like Trump, eh?

I would say more like embellish, convoluted, and misdirecting. He’s not a reporter. Just another talking head with an opinion.

Look, get real for a minute. Six Trump campaign associates convicted in 3 years on various corruption charges. Two cabinet members resign amid ethics violations. Obama presidency ethics or corruption violations = 0. You can believe whatever you want, but that won’t change the truth.

I know ‘em when I see ‘em.

No, Rudy’s going to the pen. Trump’s leaving office by 2021 and Biden will be president. Obama in on Biden’s scheme. That’s cute.

Yeah, I’d rather see him testifying in federal district court trying to explain his Ukrainian connection. Schiff can’t send him to the pen.

Did you not see my post discerning the difference between that and what Trump has done?

No, both sides manipulate it to keep us at odds to sell advertising. I believe good reporting exists, one just must be vigilant of one’s sources.

That is so weak. My statement about under oath was whether a statement of fact is more believable made by someone under oath, or someone not. When no one is under oath, I judge for myself what I believe to be credible. The way you twist logic, man, you should open a pretzel shop.